Re: Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 FINAL

2010-11-09 Thread john stultz
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 19:16 -0600, Paul Larson wrote: > The size correction in lmc happens at the end, so my best guess is > that it's a qemu issue. Id put a bug in against that, and we should > probably release note it as well. I've updated the wiki guide to include the --hwpack option and avoid

Re: Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 FINAL

2010-11-09 Thread Steve Langasek
t; available *please* test the final image candidates which can be found as > follows: > Headless (console only) image: > http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-headless/20101108/2 > ALIP image: This should also be: http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-alip/2010110

Re: Add common interface for clock debug information

2010-11-09 Thread Yong Shen
> > > > > > #define INIT_CLK(name, o) { > \ > >.ops= &o, > \ > >.enable_count = 0, > \ > >.lock.mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(name.lock.mutex), \ > >.name

Re: Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 FINAL

2010-11-09 Thread Paul Larson
The size correction in lmc happens at the end, so my best guess is that it's a qemu issue. Id put a bug in against that, and we should probably release note it as well. -Paul Larson On Nov 9, 2010 6:58 PM, "john stultz" wrote: On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:47 -0600, Paul Larson wrote: > On Tue, Nov

Re: Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 FINAL

2010-11-09 Thread john stultz
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:47 -0600, Paul Larson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:12 PM, john stultz > wrote: > > So I know its not on the testing list, but the qemu > instructions on the > wiki page fail, as they don't include an omap3 hwpack. > > Feel fre

Re: Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 FINAL

2010-11-09 Thread Paul Larson
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:12 PM, john stultz wrote: > > So I know its not on the testing list, but the qemu instructions on the > wiki page fail, as they don't include an omap3 hwpack. > > Feel free to update the wiki :) > Further, after providing an omap3 hwpack to build the image, the > result

Re: Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 FINAL

2010-11-09 Thread john stultz
are > available *please* test the final image candidates which can be found as > follows: > > Headless (console only) image: > http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-headless/20101108/2 > > Please select the 20101109 hwpack for your board at: > > http://snaps

Re: Ubuntu ARM and the linaro kernels

2010-11-09 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Montag, den 08.11.2010, 15:46 + schrieb Jamie Bennett: > > > * linaro kernels used in ubuntu ARM would need to move to the > > > supported > > > package set (main) which makes them fall under all freeze restrictions > > > the kernel team s

Re: Ubuntu ARM and the linaro kernels

2010-11-09 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Montag, den 08.11.2010, 15:46 + schrieb Jamie Bennett: > > * linaro kernels used in ubuntu ARM would need to move to the > > supported > > package set (main) which makes them fall under all freeze restrictions > > the kernel team sets for ubuntu (only SRUs post kernel freeze, patches >

Re: Ubuntu ARM and the linaro kernels

2010-11-09 Thread John Rigby
Oliver, On the subject of Ubuntu sauce and security patches, at each linaro kernel release I merge in the latest Ubuntu release so I believe the linaro packaged kernel has all these. My current plan is to continue doing to track the Ubuntu kernel as long as the Ubuntu kernel is supported. On th

re: Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 FINAL

2010-11-09 Thread Jamie Bennett
Hi, It has been pointed out that due to a failure in the build system the following image link is wrong. > EFL Netbook image: > http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-netbook-efl/20101108/2/ Please use the image at EFL Netbook image: http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-netb

Weekly Release Meeting Cancelled

2010-11-09 Thread Jamie Bennett
Hi, Due to the Linaro 10.11 final release happening tomorrow and blueprints still being ironed out, the next two weeks of release meetings have been cancelled. Normal release meetings will commence on 2010-11-25. This date is a US holiday but I expect our non-US friends to join us. Regards, Jamie

Re: Add common interface for clock debug information

2010-11-09 Thread Eric Miao
// snip > This would give us: > > #define CLK_NAME_LEN    16 > > struct clk { >        const struct clk_ops    *ops; >        unsigned int                    enable_count; >        struct mutex                    mutex; >        const char                      name[CLK_NAME_LEN]; > }; > > #define

Re: nano-headless

2010-11-09 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia poniedziałek, 8 listopada 2010 o 09:36:52 Arnd Bergmann napisał(a): > I've had a few conversations at Plumbers Conf about the new "yocto" > project of the Linux Foundation. I think going to the really small > sizes (certainly below 64 MB), it would be much easier to build on > this than the U

Re: nano-headless

2010-11-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 06 November 2010, Tom Gall wrote: > I've put a little time into generating a hyper small footprint linaro > headless image. From UDS the two sizes to try and fit into as I > understand are 64M and 128M installed. So with that in mind, via live > helper I created a headless image where n

Re: Problems with BeagleBoard installation

2010-11-09 Thread Paweł Moll
> OK. I would still love to see a page that you can find in the wiki > search box when searching for terms like "image installation" or > something along the line. Having said that, last week, being in Olympia, I was "promoting" Linaro images between my colleagues there, and their first question

Re: Problems with BeagleBoard installation

2010-11-09 Thread Jamie Bennett
On 8 Nov 2010, at 15:52, Alexander Sack wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Dave Martin wrote: Dave Martin also gave me this link https://wiki.linaro.org/Source/ImageInstallation, but it doesn't exist anymore. I'm pretty sure the link was there before. Now I can't find any instal

Re: Ubuntu ARM and the linaro kernels

2010-11-09 Thread Jamie Bennett
Hi Oliver, Answers in-line below. On 8 Nov 2010, at 15:12, Oliver Grawert wrote: hi, at UDS we discussed the possibility of using linaro kernels for some of the ubuntu ARM flavours (currently for omap3 images but there might be more to come) where we seem to have duplicated efforts in kern

Re: Add common interface for clock debug information

2010-11-09 Thread Yong Shen
Hi Jeremy, Thanks for comments. Please see my further discussion. > > > 1. Create clock information based on common clock device, more specific, > > based on struct clk_lookup. Since platform drivers are supposed to > register > > their clock > > using 'void clkdev_add(struct clk_lookup *cl)', c

Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 FINAL

2010-11-09 Thread Jamie Bennett
://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-handset-plasma/20101108/2 Please select the 20101109 hwpack for your board at: http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-hwpacks/ To install the image please see: http://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/DailyBuilds and report your results at: http

Re: Add common interface for clock debug information

2010-11-09 Thread Jeremy Kerr
Hi Yong, > To do so, I need to make somethings done, and some of them are related to > common clock code, for which I am more than happy to hear your comments. Definitely, I'm happy to help out. > 1. Create clock information based on common clock device, more specific, > based on struct clk_look