On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:07:27AM -0400, Scott Bambrough wrote:
>> This script should ask some basic questions and just do the right
>> thing. This should be a separate script from linaro-media-create.
>>
>> Questions would be:
>>
Thanks for reviewing and helping. I addressed the the comments with
the updated patch, except the following ones.
>> @@ -371,10 +385,17 @@
>>
>> # Create a VFAT or FAT16 partition of 9 cylinders which is about 64M
>> # and a linux partition of the rest
>> + if [ "$DEVIMAGE" = imx51 ]; then
Hi Tom,
Thanks for guiding the package manipulation. I'm building mx51
headless hwpack image on mx51evk. Though I can make local changes to
get it work, I'm wondering when the lh headless config trunk will have
mx51 hwpack support in there.
--
Regards,
Shawn
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:48 AM, T
Hi,
On 09/30/2010 04:03 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 30/09/2010 02:42, Christian Robottom Reis a écrit :
>> I have a similar problem, but ironically with Angstrom on my IGEPv2. It
>> says this when nothing is plugged in:
>>
>> r...@igep0020:~# lsusb
>> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b
Hi,
On 09/30/2010 03:42 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:21:54PM +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
>> In order to see home exactly I'm cooking it you can look here:
>> http://ebvbeagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/linaro-on-beagle.html
>
> Oh, this is pretty neat. Thanks for the
Hi,
Le 30/09/2010 02:42, Christian Robottom Reis a écrit :
> I have a similar problem, but ironically with Angstrom on my IGEPv2. It
> says this when nothing is plugged in:
>
> r...@igep0020:~# lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
>
> If I plug
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> What does lsusb tell you?
>
> I have a similar problem, but ironically with Angstrom on my IGEPv2. It
> says this when nothing is plugged in:
>
> r...@igep0020:~# lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
> Bus 002 Device 001: I
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:21:54PM +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
> In order to see home exactly I'm cooking it you can look here:
> http://ebvbeagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/linaro-on-beagle.html
Oh, this is pretty neat. Thanks for the post!
> It comes up more or less happily, but as soon as I connect
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:07:27AM -0400, Scott Bambrough wrote:
> This script should ask some basic questions and just do the right
> thing. This should be a separate script from linaro-media-create.
>
> Questions would be:
> - What SoC?
> - What board?
> - What release (milestone)?
> - Imag
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The big hit from using Nicolas tree will rather be that it is
> 2.6.35-based, while we have a lot of stuff merged for
> 2.6.36 and a similar pile of stuff stacked in different next
> trees so I will have to pull all of that out (including some
> extensio
2010/9/29 Arnd Bergmann :
> [Me]
>> Any hints on how to get out of this and create a simple
>> git tree or set of trees is welcome, I have yet not found
>> any.
>
> I think you need to stop basing on top of linux-next and
> move to basing on top of the smallest possible set of trees
> other than m
Hi,
I'm playing around with the daily snapshots.
Currently I'm using the snapshot from 20100929 on an EBVBeagle C2.
In order to see home exactly I'm cooking it you can look here:
http://ebvbeagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/linaro-on-beagle.html
It comes up more or less happily, b
Notes from today's Landing Team call:
https://wiki.linaro.org/LandingTeams/Meetings/2010-09-29
--Matt
=== Attendees ===
* Loïc Minier
* Matt Waddel
* Torez Smith
* Scott Bambrough
=== Agenda ===
* Action items from last meeting.
* Achievements / progress reports
* OMAP3
* Versatile
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro User Platforms Weekly Status meeting dated 9/29 held in
#linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 13:00 UTC.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/WeeklyStatus/2010-09-29
Regards,
Tom (tgall_foo)
User Platforms Tea
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:22:52AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >Cross-building of Debian packages is meant to be handled by using the
> >'dpkg-buildpackage -a${target_arch}' interface. This sets the environment
> >variables shown in the output of 'dpkg-architecture -a${target_arch}'.
> Do you hav
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Do you have an example of a package that correctly cross builds? The
> issue I'm having with the kernel is that there are some native gcc steps
> that compile tools executed during the build as well as some cross
> compile steps. If I can correctly dete
All,
I've created a wiki page at https://wiki.linaro.org/LiveHelper/Hacking
to describe the various steps for building your own linaro images on
arm hardware using live helper. This also includes the steps to
modifying seeds to add/subtrack packages to suite your own goals
whatever they might be.
On 09/29/2010 10:59 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:33:59AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
>> kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
>
>> fakeroot debian/rules binary-omap arch=armel
>> .
>
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> > Indeed. And that's exactly what I'm looking for in order to produce the
> > linaro-next kernel tree. The linaro-next tree is discarded and rebuilt
> > from scratch by merging together a bunch of development trees
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:33:59AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
> kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
> fakeroot debian/rules binary-omap arch=armel
> .
> dh_gencontrol -plinux-image-2.6.35-22-omap
> dpkg-g
I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
fakeroot debian/rules binary-omap arch=armel
.
dh_gencontrol -plinux-image-2.6.35-22-omap
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'amd64' does not
appear in p
Official proposal for stakeholder process for the following idea.
Anyone can contribute.
Summary
--
Amit Kucheria has suggested we create a script called linaro-testdrive
to ease the knowledge required to download images and create bootable
media.
In his opinion as we continuously add s
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:27:48 +0300, Amit Kucheria
wrote:
> And with the right packaging, upgrades to linaro-testdrive will
> continually add support for new platforms and boards.
That will require some changes to l-m-c as well, to allow us to specify
board customisations, rather than hardcoding
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Scott Bambrough
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:45 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> IMHO, as we continuously add support for more platforms and even more
>> boards,
>> it will become untenable to maintain these wiki pages. Something
>> similar to
>> 'testdrive' for
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:45 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> IMHO, as we continuously add support for more platforms and even more
> boards,
> it will become untenable to maintain these wiki pages. Something
> similar to
> 'testdrive' for Ubuntu is required for the next cycle.
>
> Why can't l-m-c ask
Hello, I have been lurking here and on irc for a while and felt like it was
time to introduce myself.
I have a BB-C4 with all the trimmings and have been booting SD flash with
the daily builds and trying different configurations. I have also signed up
for weekly testing on the BB.
>From the wiki
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I made a l-m-c patch to add imx51 support. I need your help to review
> and merge the code.
Thanks!
You probably want to use the board name, mx51evk, not the SoC name,
imx51; this also avoids mixing mx51 (kernel flavor) and imx51 (DEVNAME)
in the scri
Only one comment for now. I'll test the patch.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I made a l-m-c patch to add imx51 support. I need your help to review
> and merge the code.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shawn
>
>
> # Begin patch
> === modified file 'linaro-media-create'
> --- linaro-medi
I made a l-m-c patch to add imx51 support. I need your help to review
and merge the code.
--
Regards,
Shawn
# Begin patch
=== modified file 'linaro-media-create'
--- linaro-media-create 2010-09-28 18:53:19 +
+++ linaro-media-create 2010-09-30 00:36:30 +
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
* beagle
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Indeed. And that's exactly what I'm looking for in order to produce the
> linaro-next kernel tree. The linaro-next tree is discarded and rebuilt
> from scratch by merging together a bunch of development trees on a
> regular basis. I'd like to add your up-to-date tree t
On 10 Sep 27, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have only 43 (or 42 depending on your timezone) days until the Linaro
> final release [1] and
> as we get closer, the need for more structured testing is essential. An idea
> that has been
> incubating for some time is to have a weekly 'test day'
Hi everyone,
The minutes of the weekly call can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2010-09-29
Attendees:
Linaro: Amit Kucheria, Amit Arora, Vincent, Yong
ARM: Srinivas Kalaga
Highlight: Discussion on PM QA validation
Regards,
Amit
__
Hi,
notes and actions from our Monday graphics and multimedia cross-vendor
call are available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/2010-09-27
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics#W
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
>
> As we are starting to produce a number of images now, I've split them up
> into two categories, 'Primary' and 'Secondary'. Of course it would be
> nice if all images were tested but if we can get through the Primary
> ones each week that wo
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:50:03PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:28:26AM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> > OK, I put together:
> >
> > http://wiki.linaro.org/Process/ReleaseTesting
> >
> > As we are starting to produce a number of images now, I've split them u
35 matches
Mail list logo