Instructions for installing Marcin's cross compiler on Lucid are here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/CrossCompilerOnLucid
-- Michael
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lina
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010, Paul Larson wrote:
> This looks great! Just out of curiosity, did you look at anything else such
> as buildbot maybe? I'm curious what reasons you had for choosing hudson
> over other alternatives.
I did! Thanks for asking! :-)
In fact, before I started looking for som
Show and tell time. Here's mine:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog
It's all Makefile based in the background. I've used buildbot before
and been very happy with it but it was too hard to integrate with bzr.
-- Michael
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>Hey
>
> Per the topic quoted below (kernel + u-boot release process), I've
> setup the awesome hudson CI server on my personal system until we can
> move it to the datacenter; it's accessible at http://hudson.dooz.org/
>
This looks gr
Hey
Per the topic quoted below (kernel + u-boot release process), I've
setup the awesome hudson CI server on my personal system until we can
move it to the datacenter; it's accessible at http://hudson.dooz.org/
It currently builds various branches (repositories really) of u-boot
with
> * which devices do we need to cover?
>* beagleboard -- would probably work in QEMU
>* google nexus one
>* should probably cover vexpress and imx51 babbage
FYI, we have a guy in ARM who created patches to run Android on ARM realView
platforms using upstream linux kernel or Catalin's
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> Loic, did you mean to say that it's _easy_ to backport it or _not easy_?
I was told the patches are NOT hard to backport because they are
relatively self contained
--
Lo?c Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010, Guillaume Letellier wrote:
> FYI, we have a guy in ARM who created patches to run Android on ARM
> realView platforms using upstream linux kernel or Catalin's kernel
> tree (ARM AEL) - i.e. the patches are the diff between the upstream
> tree and Google's trees + a few patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/10 17:23, Paul Larson wrote:
>> Other options are (off the top of my head):
>> - - Basic/Digest HTTP authentication. Digest is pretty good (or so
>>
> I think this would fit our needs just fine.
I agree, and for the moment I'd like to pursue
Here's my $0.02 (adjusted for inflation):
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Zygmunt Krynicki <
zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote:
> I think that for our internal use cases a best option would be launchpad
> integration. We don't mind using launchpad, we already have accounts
> there. We could use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/10 16:39, Loïc Minier wrote:
>* main use case would be the devicetree stuff; that one is really
> easy to backport, so might not be a good idea to move Android
> forward
Loic, did you mean to say that it's _easy_ to
Hi
== Attendees ==
* Scott Bambrough
* Loïc Minier
* Yves Vandervennet
== Minutes ==
* build and provide a downloadable Android toolchain
* base it on our toolchain as soon as possible
* provide a Linaro Android distribution, with a set of git trees for
Android components
Hi All,
About issues for porting clutk to opengl es2.0, I'd like to give some
related background of clutk and clutter/cogl implementations first.
clutk:
- some ARB extensions are used for opengl to support legacy chipsets (i.e,
ARB_vertex_program, ARB_fragment_program, ARB_multitexture, ...)
- fi
Hi,
notes and actions from our Monday graphics and multimedia cross-vendor
call are available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/2010-08-30
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/2010-09-06
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
FAOD, the patch I sent you for that project is copyright Linaro, as per
the CodeSourcery contract (it's a non-FSF project, of course).
Andrew
On 05/09/10 22:41, Michael Hope wrote:
> I don't understand the page at:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Copyright
>
> I've put the new Toolchain WG web tools
Hi Jean,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean Pihet [mailto:jean.pi...@newoldbits.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 9:53 PM
> To: Sripathy, Vishwanath
> Cc: Shilimkar, Santosh; Amit Kucheria; Kevin Hilman;
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org;
> linux-o...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATC
Adding linux-omap to CC
On 10 Sep 06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi. I have a question about what the memory map of the TI OMAP3 (35xx)
> looks like on startup, which I'm hoping somebody here can answer.
> (Steve, Richard: you're on the CC: because Loic suggested that you
> would be good people to ask
17 matches
Mail list logo
