The following changes since commit 7a949698c262fab1f0ecac8adf3ceb7eaafa8c8c:
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35-1004.8
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro.git linaro
John Rigby (2):
LINARO: Start new release
LINARO: Linaro-2
vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org writes:
> From: Vishwanath BS
>
> This patch has instrumentation code for measuring latencies for
> various CPUIdle C states for OMAP. Idea here is to capture the
> timestamp at various phases of CPU Idle and then compute the sw
> latency for various c states. For
Amit Kucheria writes:
> On 10 Aug 28, vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Vishwanath BS
>>
>> This patch has instrumentation code for measuring latencies for
>> various CPUIdle C states for OMAP. Idea here is to capture the
>> timestamp at various phases of CPU Idle and then compute
On 10 Aug 28, vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Vishwanath BS
>
> This patch has instrumentation code for measuring latencies for
> various CPUIdle C states for OMAP. Idea here is to capture the
> timestamp at various phases of CPU Idle and then compute the sw
> latency for various c
On 27 Aug 2010, at 19:05, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:03:32 -0400, James Westby
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:26:46 -0400, James Westby
>> wrote:
>> Is the current status quo to create specs under the "linaro" project on
>> Launchpad? I'll create a spec for this so that we
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 02:05:30PM -0400, James Westby wrote:
> > https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/Specs/10.11/HardwarePacks
> >
> > to a state where I am happy to start implementation now. Feedback on the
> > spec is still welcome, and things will still be subject to change. In
>
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of C V, Silesh
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:28 PM
> To: vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PA
g 28, 2010 at 3:38 AM, wrote:
> From: Vishwanath BS
>
> This patch has instrumentation code for measuring latencies for
> various CPUIdle C states for OMAP. Idea here is to capture the
> timestamp at various phases of CPU Idle and then compute the sw
> latency for various c states. For OMAP, 32k
Hi Vishwa,
On 8/28/2010 12:08 AM, vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Vishwanath BS
>
> This patch has instrumentation code for measuring latencies for
> various CPUIdle C states for OMAP. Idea here is to capture the
> timestamp at various phases of CPU Idle and then compute the sw
> lat
Benoit,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>> This patch has instrumentation code for measuring latencies for
>> various CPUIdle C states for OMAP. Idea here is to capture the
>> timestamp at various phases of CPU Idle and then compute the sw
>> latency for various c states.
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:08 AM, wrote:
> From: Vishwanath BS
>
> This patch has instrumentation code for measuring latencies for
> various CPUIdle C states for OMAP. Idea here is to capture the
> timestamp at various phases of CPU Idle and then compute the sw
> latency for various c state
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jean Pihet
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:17 PM
> To: vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PAT
[ resending with the correct address ]
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:03:32 -0400, James Westby
wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:26:46 -0400, James Westby
> wrote:
> > There is also one larger question, which is that I disagree that we
> > shouldn't provide anything that will go in a hardware pack in
Benoit,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Cousson, Benoit
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:56 PM
> To: vishwanath.sripa...@linaro.org; Sripathy, Vishwanath
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lis
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:00 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for allowing me to start my contributions.
> I have downloaded 23/08/10 daily packages and put the binaries into MMC and
> boot the system. It was hanging in the U-Boot after I2C ready console print.
>
> My beagle board is Rev C4.
Common pr
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:00 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for allowing me to start my contributions.
> I have downloaded 23/08/10 daily packages and put the binaries into MMC and
> boot the system. It was hanging in the U-Boot after I2C ready console print.
>
> My beagle board is Rev C4.
Could you
Hi,
Thanks for allowing me to start my contributions.
I have downloaded 23/08/10 daily packages and put the binaries into MMC and
boot the system. It was hanging in the U-Boot after I2C ready console print.
My beagle board is Rev C4.
Thanks,
Hariharan.V.
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
-Or
On 08/26/2010 03:41 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
applied and uploaded
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/
Hi,
Beta Freeze [1] is now in effect. All uploads to the main archive must be
approved by a member of the
release team so if changes are needed, please get them in as soon as possible.
Uploads to other
archives do not need to be acknowledged by the release team and can continue to
be pushed, wi
On 27 Aug 2010, at 10:16, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2010, at 00:34, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
>> Hey!
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010, nvhariha...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I am having experience in Omap, imx based linux platforms.
>>> How shall I involve myself into the linaro development,
>>>
On Aug 27, 2010, at 00:34, Loïc Minier wrote:
>Hey!
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010, nvhariha...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am having experience in Omap, imx based linux platforms.
>> How shall I involve myself into the linaro development,
>> I am into this maillist and using the linaro distribution
From: Vishwanath BS
This patch has instrumentation code for measuring latencies for
various CPUIdle C states for OMAP. Idea here is to capture the
timestamp at various phases of CPU Idle and then compute the sw
latency for various c states. For OMAP, 32k clock is chosen as
reference clock this as
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:34:37AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> - testing our linux-linaro-2.6.35 kernel and u-boot-linaro bootloader
>and reporting any missing features / bugs when compared to other
>distros
> - measuring boot time of the various pieces (x-loader, u-boot, kernel,
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
