On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. I got two new IGEPv2 boards over the weekend. They're now
> happily running linux-linaro 2.6.35-1001.5.
>
> I made the following changes:
> * Statically link USB mass storage support so that I can use my USB
> HDD as a rootfs
>
Hi Pedro. From a compiler point of view we take the 'do no harm'
approach. The compiler is intended for the Cortex-A series and all
new work is focused on that area, but the ARMv5 support should be no
worse than the upstream version. Give the toolchain a try as the bug
fixes and performance impr
The fixed phy is a blocker - you can't modprobe the network driver
with it turned on.
-- Michael
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:39:03AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Hi there. I got two new IGEPv2 boards over the weekend. They're no
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Couldn't we simply use the kernel tree "make uImage" rule, and put the
> > uImage in the kernel binary packages, rather than reduplicating this
> > elsewhere? Of course, which kernel tree targets to build may t
Hello,
I'm looking for some advice on the feasibility of using Linaro on one of
my projects based on an AT91SAM9260 Atmel processor, which has an
ARM926EJ-S ARMv5 processor core.
I see that the Linaro builds do not support v5 and I wonder, what would
be involved in "recompiling" Linaro with v5
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:39:03AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. I got two new IGEPv2 boards over the weekend. They're now
> happily running linux-linaro 2.6.35-1001.5.
>
> I made the following changes:
[...]
> * Turn off CONFIG_FIXED_PHY to prevent a sysfs conflict with the
> network
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 15:46 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:39:00PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> > If anyone knows how the state regarding accelerated graphics is, let me
> > know. It would be pretty interesting to support that in mainline as
> > well. Until no
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > a kernel build most commonly outputs a zImage; this is then converted
> > to an uImage for u-boot consumption with some rune like:
> > mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kern
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:39:00PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> If anyone knows how the state regarding accelerated graphics is, let me
> know. It would be pretty interesting to support that in mainline as
> well. Until now, we don't have any idea if there is some documentation
> for the z430 co
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:41:49PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> > What features do you need?
>
> network,
Works in the mainline.
> serial cons
Works as well.
> and USB storage functional should be plenty.
That works as well.
> > However, if you need the graphics stack that your best bet is the
>
On Aug 24, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is there a Linaro kernel available for the Efika MX?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Tom,
>
> What features do you need?
network, serial cons and USB storage functional should be plenty.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a Linaro kernel available for the Efika MX?
>
> Thanks!
Tom,
What features do you need?
I plan to get atleast a working serial console on it when I get the
board later this week.
However, if you need the graphics stack tha
So I gave a try to cross-compiling gstreamer0.10 and it some
interesting issues.
First, I used an i386 chroot instead of an amd64 chroot since I thought
that might help a bit with package names; I'm not actually sure that
was needed, but it might influence results.
Second, here is how I ran
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> Shouldn't it registered as an upstream project and maintained there? (I
> suspect this is a Steve L. or Scott B. project)
I don't see the need right now; easy enough to do that when it is, but
right now the releases are uploads to Ubuntu.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:19:54PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> There is some basic i.MX51 support in the mainline kernel; Amit K. of
> Linaro worked on this port, and ISTR him telling me it would boot to a
> serial console. This port was developed on the Babbage.
I know, we are maintai
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:14:19PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:48:54AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> > Is there a Linaro kernel available for the Efika MX?
>
> There's at least no support for it in mainline linux.
There is some basic i.MX51 support in the mainline kernel
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:48:54AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Is there a Linaro kernel available for the Efika MX?
There's at least no support for it in mainline linux.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions
Hi All,
Is there a Linaro kernel available for the Efika MX?
Thanks!
Tom
"We want great men who, when fortune frowns will not be discouraged." - Colonel
Henry Knox
w) tom.gall att linaro.org
w) tom_gall att vnet.ibm.com
h) tom_gall att mac.com
_
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:22:51PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > i cannot enter a bug in the xdeb launchpad project. where should I
> > enter this bug?
>
> Oh right, please use the Ubuntu source package to report bugs; we only
> have it in Ubuntu right now.
Shouldn't it registered as an upstrea
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
> well.. this debian bug clearly explains my problem! thanks for
> pointing this out! so for now the only option is to set this
> manually? what is the long term option?
xdeb should be fixed to set that until there is a $triplet-pkg-config
> i canno
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
>> I am still trying to setup a functional cross compilation
>> environment for our packages. I want to be able to build without
>> xdeb, using debuild command (this is mainly because we use other
>> tools such as git-buildpackage).
>>
> (You
> +++ Dechesne, Nicolas [2010-08-23 23:31 +0200]:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have another question related to cross compilation...
>>
>> I am still trying to setup a functional cross compilation environment for our
>> packages. I want to be able to build without xdeb, using debuild command
>> (this
On 08/23/2010 10:10 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Tim Gardner
> wrote:
>
>>
>> You're kind of playing games with the ABI files for the new mx51 flavour,
>> but I uploaded anyways.
> So if I bump the ABI then I don't need ABI-1 files for new flavour?
>>
>> --
>> Tim Gard
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:06 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 2. What is the purpose of the hwpack.deb that is mentioned in
> places?
>
> this is scotts baby i think. personally i am fine without a
> hwpack.deb. I think the idea was that configs etc. like apt source
> lines accompany
On 10 Aug 24, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > assuming we have support to cross install debs on your sdcard, wouldn''t it
> > be good enough for your case to keep the old deb and install that rather
> > than keeping the backup on the sdcard?
>
> It's a valid p
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Alexander Sack wrote:
> assuming we have support to cross install debs on your sdcard, wouldn''t it
> be good enough for your case to keep the old deb and install that rather
> than keeping the backup on the sdcard?
It's a valid point; also, the kernel changes ABI so frequen
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
> Couldn't we simply use the kernel tree "make uImage" rule, and put the
> uImage in the kernel binary packages, rather than reduplicating this
> elsewhere? Of course, which kernel tree targets to build may then
> become board-specific, which might be seen
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On 10 Aug 24, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > > * Ability to have a 'backup' kernel/initramfs in case of broken kernels
> > >- A script running on x86 should allow me to revert to the backup
> kernel
On 10 Aug 24, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > * Ability to have a 'backup' kernel/initramfs in case of broken kernels
> >- A script running on x86 should allow me to revert to the backup kernel
> >incase the new kernel does not boot
>
> Keeping a backup
Greetings.
> -Original Message-
> From: Amit Kucheria [mailto:amit.kuche...@linaro.org]
[...]
> * ACTION: Robin to send links to patches sent to linux-pm
Amit, this URL points to the discussion I was referring to. It turns
out that it's the cpufreq list and it's a sort of RFC really, n
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> * Ability to have a 'backup' kernel/initramfs in case of broken kernels
>- A script running on x86 should allow me to revert to the backup kernel
>incase the new kernel does not boot
Keeping a backup is a good idea, but installing it from your
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> a kernel build most commonly outputs a zImage; this is then converted
>> to an uImage for u-boot consumption with some rune like:
>> mkimage -A arm -O linux -
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
[...]
>
> a kernel build most commonly outputs a zImage; this is then converted
> to an uImage for u-boot consumption with some rune like:
> mkimage -A arm -O linux -T kernel -C none \
> -a 0x80008000 -e 0x80008000 -n Linux \
33 matches
Mail list logo
