Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Ok, some questions for the meeting. Actually, if we can answer these > > > we may not need a meeting. > > I agree. We have too many meetings already. This stuff can surely be > > dealt by email? > > Nic

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010, John Rigby wrote: > Only thing left is the u-boot package trees. Could they live in > jcrigby as well? Would be consistent -- Loïc Minier ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/l

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread John Rigby
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> > Ok, some questions for the meeting.  Actually, if we can answer these >> > we may not need a meeting. >> I agree.  We have too many meetings already. This stuff can surely be >> dealt by email? >

Linaro Infrastructure Team Weekly Report (2010-08-13 to 2010-08-18)

2010-08-21 Thread Scott Bambrough
The weekly report for the Linaro Infrastructure team may be found at: Status report: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Status/2010-08-12 Burndown chart: http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/arm-infrastructure.html Progress: * LEP/DerivativeDistributions: Backend w

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Ok, some questions for the meeting. Actually, if we can answer these > > we may not need a meeting. > I agree. We have too many meetings already. This stuff can surely be > dealt by email? Nicolas, I was mostly piggybacking on the release process

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, John Rigby wrote: > Ok, some questions for the meeting. Actually, if we can answer these > we may not need a meeting. I agree. We have too many meetings already. This stuff can surely be dealt by email? > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Thu, Au

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread John Rigby
Ok, some questions for the meeting. Actually, if we can answer these we may not need a meeting. On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010, John Rigby wrote: >> I have moved the linux-linaro, linux-meta-linaro and u-boot-linaro git >> trees on git.linaro.org out f

Re: Hardware pack questions

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010, James Westby wrote: > 3. Do we want to be able to pull in new versions of a hwpack on > request, or should it just be a case of updating the image, with a > hwpack-install call if you want to install a newer version that pulls > in new packages? This would come for f

Re: Hardware pack questions

2010-08-21 Thread James Westby
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:49:58 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 04:26:46PM -0400, James Westby wrote: > > 5. What are the use cases for tags? I can only see X/no X in the spec. > > One other I see is OpenMAX + Gstreamer versus pure Gstreamer versus > OpenCORE. I gu

Re: Hardware pack questions

2010-08-21 Thread James Westby
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:15:31 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > I'm not sure I understand your question, though. Are you asking if > packages could be excluded at hardware-pack install time or at creation > time? I mean at install time. The only use case I have seen so far is --no-X. That'

Re: Hardware pack questions

2010-08-21 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 05:54:20PM -0400, James Westby wrote: > On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:49:58 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 04:26:46PM -0400, James Westby wrote: > > > 5. What are the use cases for tags? I can only see X/no X in the spec. > > > > One other

Re: Hardware pack questions

2010-08-21 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:37:43PM -0400, James Westby wrote: > I would like to know of any other use cases though. What about the OpenMAX plus gstreamer versus gstreamer versus OpenCORE (plus OpenMAX) use case I mentioned? > Using X to mean x.org and an arbitrary board is mighty confusing :-) O

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote: > Since moving these trees means people that have already cloned the trees need > to go fix their .git/config, might I suggest one more change? When moving trees, consider adding a symlink on git.linaro.org for this case. -- Loïc Minier _

Re: new more official sounding linux and u-boot git trees and u-boot release plans

2010-08-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010, John Rigby wrote: > I have moved the linux-linaro, linux-meta-linaro and u-boot-linaro git > trees on git.linaro.org out from under my directory to their own > directories to make it obvious that they are official trees and not my > personal development trees. This creates c