Does ltrace do what you want?
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> I'd like to record the running of a typical program such as Firefox,
> GCC, or ffmpeg and capture the calls and arguments to functions like
> strcpy() and memcpy(). The idea is to generate a usage profile so we
>
Michael Hope wrote:
> I'd like to record the running of a typical program such as Firefox,
> GCC, or ffmpeg and capture the calls and arguments to functions like
> strcpy() and memcpy(). The idea is to generate a usage profile so we
> can tell what standard library functions and what variants (i.e
Will Oprofile help you on that?
BR,
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org
> [mailto:linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Michael Hope
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 10:47 PM
> To: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Capturing usage infor
I'd like to record the running of a typical program such as Firefox,
GCC, or ffmpeg and capture the calls and arguments to functions like
strcpy() and memcpy(). The idea is to generate a usage profile so we
can tell what standard library functions and what variants (i.e.
aligned/unaligned, small c
Hi, Michael
Thanks for your reply. :)
OK, I will wait for the next release and would like to give it a try on
our I.MX51/MX53 platforms and give you valuable feedback.
BR,
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Hope [mailto:michael.h...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, A
Hi Jason. There's a couple of different things going on here. The
Toolchain Working Group, which I am a part of, is working on both 4.4
and 4.5 based versions of GCC. We want the Linaro version to be 'the
toolchain for ARM', as in the one that people first go to when
thinking about an ARM projec
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 04:56:18PM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> As a followup to a conversation I had with Alexander (asac) on IRC, i'd like
> to request the addition of some packages to the headless image. This is to
> make the images more useful out-of-the-box.
> - ifplugd (dhcp networking)
if
I'll get these added to the ui image as well.
Regards,
Tom
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As a followup to a conversation I had with Alexander (asac) on IRC, i'd like
>> to request the addition of some pa
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a followup to a conversation I had with Alexander (asac) on IRC, i'd like
> to request the addition of some packages to the headless image. This is to
> make the images more useful out-of-the-box.
>
> - ifplugd (dhcp networking)
> -
Hi,
As a followup to a conversation I had with Alexander (asac) on IRC, i'd like
to request the addition of some packages to the headless image. This is to
make the images more useful out-of-the-box.
- ifplugd (dhcp networking)
- screen (multiple terminals over a serial console)
- vim (or any oth
FYI (CCed Chris if you have questions)
- Forwarded message from Christopher James Halse Rogers
-
From: Christopher James Halse Rogers
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss ,
ubuntu-devel-annou...@lists.ubuntu.com,
ubuntu-x
Subject: Xserver 1.9 transition
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2
Hi, Linaoer,
I'm one SW engineer named Jason Liu from Freescale. I noticed that
there are some discussion about the arm-cross-toolchain. I want to know
the following:
What cross-tool chain will Linaro use? What's the version number?
Will it enable ARM-V7 support?
Will it enalbe NEON supp
Hello Dave,
Dave Martin [2010-08-09 9:48 +0100]:
> Fortunately fragmentation is not a problem: tar --delete squashes the
> deleted entry out of the file by rewriting the entire file contents
> from the point where the deletion occurred ;) Of course, that could
> be a bit slow, especially if you
Hello Dave,
Dave Martin [2010-08-09 10:47 +0100]:
> Hence my thought of having a tarball per package. I'm still a bit
> worried about a post-unpack hook changing the package files to be
> different from dpkg's file list for the package -- that could cause
> safety problems. Is there a way to tel
Christian Robottom Reis [2010-08-06 10:30 -0300]:
> By touch I think you mean install, upgrade or remove, and of these I
> guess upgrade is the more common case; do you think it is?
install and upgrade are the common ones, right.
> Would the overhead be significant even if the tarball wasn't comp
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Dave,
[...]
> Ah, right. I take it that rules out having one big tarball for
> /usr/share/doc/ then?
Hence my thought of having a tarball per package. I'm still a bit
worried about a post-unpack hook changing the package files to be
d
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
[...]
> As far as I know you can append files; I'm not sure about "inline"
> deletion, but even if it would exist, then over time (i. e. upgrades)
> you would dramatically fragment the file, which reduces or even
> reverts the initial space savi
17 matches
Mail list logo
