Polyphonic problem...

2008-01-05 Thread milarepa7
Hello, I've got a problem with this little piece of code, can someone explain where it comes from? The code seems a bit complex for that example but I'm transcribing a larger piece and I'm calling the different movements like that, so that's in the seventh (variation of Bach's Dmin Ciaccona) the p

working with two different lilypond versions

2008-01-05 Thread milarepa7
Hello, I'd like to know what is the way to invoke a specific lilypond version? I saw the command "LILYPOND_DATADIR" to set this up ( for me it would be /usr/share/lilypond/2.11.37 or 2.10.33) I don't know how to do that and maybe there's an easier way. To be more precise, I'm under Gentoo and put

Re: Polyphonic problem...

2008-01-05 Thread milarepa7
Ole Schmidt wrote: > > you forgot to close the << with >> in the > seven = { >> >> <<{ \first} \\ >> { \second } >> > > block > Thanks but maybe it was an error when I copied the code to insert it in the message, if I forget that it won't be compiled at all. I just extracted from the whole m

Re: Polyphonic problem...

2008-01-05 Thread milarepa7
Gilles THIBAULT wrote: > > The code you have given compiles without any errors in version "2.11.34". > Perhaps a "2.11.36" bugs ? > Yes maybe, I "emerged" the 2.11.37 yesterday and the bug (now I'm sure that we can call it like this) is still there... That's why I posted to know how I can use

Re: Polyphonic problem...

2008-01-05 Thread milarepa7
Stan Sanderson wrote: > > Your code compiles on 2.11.37 without errors here (Mac PPC). > Ok so that's surely a problem with my ebuild (I'm on Gentoo) I'll wait that an official one gets released on portage. Thank you Matth -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Polyphonic-pro

Re: Polyphonic problem...

2008-01-06 Thread milarepa7
Ok, I tried with the 2.10 version (the only other lilypond version I have) and it works fine, maybe it's close to the 540 issue... Regards -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Polyphonic-problem...-tp14615208p14616301.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archiv

Re: working with two different lilypond versions

2008-01-09 Thread milarepa7
Thanks but I found another way to still use portage, I emerge the first version, on slot one, and then move the files from /usr/bin to another directory like /usr/bin/lilypond-x.y.z/ ;emerge the second version on another slot move files to another directory and then just use symblolic links to ch

Git ebuild

2008-01-09 Thread milarepa7
Hello, I'd like to know if one of you use the git sources with portage? I didn't find any ebuild and I've to admit that it's not easy for me to write one. It's sure there's gentoo users working with these versions how do you do that? I'd really like to run the very last lilypond version. Regards.

Re: Git ebuild

2008-01-10 Thread milarepa7
Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > > I use Gentoo, but install my lily manually from git to /usr/local/ ... > Thanks a lot, I've just done it and everything seems to work fine! I didn't compile by hand for a long time and that was a pleasure... The single strange thing that happened is that I can't co

Re: manual staff switch

2008-01-11 Thread milarepa7
Hello, Maybe there's another way to do but I would edit the "GitarreZwei.ly" like that : % staffClassicalGuitar = {c'4 c' c' c'} staffClassicalGuitarII = {g'4 g' g' \change Staff ="one" g'} \score { \new StaffGroup { \set StaffGr