On 2015-11-01 11:18, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 18:02, Brian Guo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64
>> bit) laptop, b
>> laptop, but when I try to compile a simple score, such as:
>> \version "2.19.30"
>> \score {
>>\new Staff \relative
Dear list,
I have a piece that contains phrases that are repeated often. For
example, let us assume that the phrase consists of two sixteenth notes.
In the piece in question, the unit of repetition is in fact much longer;
this is just an example. So I have done this:
phrase = { c16 d16 }
\relativ
On 2015-11-09 19:40, David Kastrup (and Simon Albrecht) wrote:
> Stephan Neuhaus writes: [...]
Thanks, both solutions work like a charm!
Now another thing, in the same context. Let's say I have
pattern = { 8 8 }
\relative c' { \repeat unfold 4 \pattern }
And let's say I wan
On 2015-12-01 11:27, David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Which explains why my default manner of tuning a guitar, namely just
tuning each string to sound as I think it should in relation to the
sequence of previous strings, has a good chance to end up more playable
than the followup work of a "serious" g
On 2016-04-17 13:51, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 17.04.2016 um 04:29 schrieb David Wright:
I think a better analogy than compilers writing programs would be
browsers rendering web pages. Can you imagine a WWW where malformed
pages produced a few error messages on the screen and nothing else?
No, we ex
On 2016-04-18 20:29, David Wright wrote:
That begs the question. How do you define "clearly malformed input."
If it is malformed, it can't be clear.
Of course, if you mean "clearly-malformed", then I contest this
vehemently.
I think I was precise enough.
But I must say that I don't feel comfo
On 2016-04-19 17:54, Tim Reeves wrote:
> Maybe they should be called "mortally-wounding" errors? :)
This is an excellent suggestion. Perhaps we could implement that further
output from Lilypond becomes more and more incoherent as the poison sets
in? And finally, the pain is too much to bear and Li
On 2016-05-11 10:41, Chris Yate wrote:
> There's no point having passwords that you can't remember;
In fact, there is: no one can force you to divulge a password that you
don't know. Which is why I have started using Keepass with a Yubikey.
The Yubikey contains a password that I certainly don't
