Hi all,
please could anybody give me a hint why staff switches are not working
with me?? Find attached a short sample of my approach, as I understand
from the documentation.
Thanks very much!
Stefan
\version "2.10.33"
NotesRH = {
\clef "treble"
\transpose c c \relative c''
{
}
}
Thanks - this saved my day :-)
stefan
Jonathan Kulp schrieb:
I think you just had one small typo. By changing "staff" to "Staff" in
the following line it works for me:
\change Staff = RHStaff b c d e
Jon
Stefan Slapeta wrote:
Hi all,
please could anybody give
Hi all,
is it possible to combine two staves temporarily in the score? The
reason behind it is that two voices have identical notes in this
section, and I would like to print them in one single staff (stem up and
down). It would be nice if this also reflects to the instrument names...
Thanks
Hi all,
As a lilypond newbie, I'm currently facing some problems in ancient
music transcription.
I could solve many things with the excellent documentation but there are
some issues where I would like to ask some more experienced users for
help :-)
As an example, I attach a script of a German
Hi,
can I achieve somehow that the ambitus is printed at a certain place?
(i.e. after the incipit!)
Thanks!
Stefan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
...is it also possible to achieve this without changing the appearance?
Means: printing notes that have a different duration than they look like
(something that \times does, just without brackets and numbers).
thanks!
stefan
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Alasdair:
This means halving the dura
Hi all,
I guess there are no newsgroups reflecting the lilypond mailing lists at the
moment.?
If not, should we try to set them up? That would make some things a lot
easier.
Regards,
Stefan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond
>
> I can't see it making a huge difference. If you're interested, I
> believe that gmane supplies NNTP. I only spent 30 seconds looking at
> their site, so I'm not totally certain though.
>
I do - searching in old threads is a _LOT_ easier with a newsgroup client
than via http archive!
I've