Turning off one time signature in 2.1.25

2004-02-21 Thread Reuben Thomas
I want to do something very simple: change the time signature without anything appearing. I looked over the list archive, but I can't find the solution. In particular, I don't want a transparent time signature; I want no space taken. I found various proposed solutions, and I tried inserting lines

Re: Turning off one time signature in 2.1.25

2004-02-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
> A much simpler solution to your problem is to change the duration of the > breve note to fit into the existing time signature: > d\breve*1/2 Brilliant, thanks. I hadn't yet come across that notation. -- http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ compulsion, n. the eloquence of power (Bierce)

Re: Strange English in the manual

2004-02-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
> > "If a staff is ended halfway a piece," > > > > Am I just being stupid, or is this a bit weird? > > For a bunch of non-native English speakers, the developers > do a fantastic job of writing documentation. Indeed. > The only exception is a persistent inability to write "staves" > instead of "s

Re: Strange English in the manual

2004-02-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
> Where is this from in the manual? Under "Staff Notation". No idea on section numbers, I'm using the HTML version. The easy way to find such things is to use a search function. -- http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ Astrophysics: it's not exactly rocket science __

Re: Strange English in the manual

2004-02-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
> >> The only exception is a persistent inability to write "staves" > >> instead of "staffs", but I think that is some kind of joke. > > > >It's American usage. My bad. I knew that the American *singular* was "staff" (British sing. "stave") and made an incorrect extrapolation. -- http://www.mups

Getting a final barline on a piano score

2004-02-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
I must be missing something simple. I am trying to get a final double barline on a piano score, but whatever I do, I get a double barline on each stave, and a single barline between them. I've read the manual, I've downloaded example code (which seems to do exactly what I've done, namely put \bar "

lilypond-user@gnu.org

2004-02-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
Another basic question, but again, I can't find the answer in the docs: does LilyPond (2.1.25 in my case) have standard text styles for expression markings, tempo markings &c.? All I've found in the docs and from pieces on mutopia.org is ad-hoc font settings (using \bold, \italic, \large &c.) which

Piano markings question

2004-02-22 Thread Reuben Thomas
I've used the hack in the Lilypond docs for getting dynamics centred between the staves of a PianoStaff, but I would like to make it more convenient to do other markings. At the moment, I can write something like s1\f to get a piano dynamic which is nicely centred, but if I write another markin

Re: Piano markings question

2004-02-23 Thread Reuben Thomas
The problem was to improve the example hack for piano dynamics being centred between the staves so that it works for other expression marks. Matts suggested: > In the definition of the Dynamics context, just add the line >\override TextScript #'padding = #0 > > or maybe > >\overri

lilypond-user@gnu.org

2004-02-23 Thread Reuben Thomas
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Another basic question, but again, I can't find the answer in the docs: > > does LilyPond (2.1.25 in my case) have standard text styles for expression > > markings, tempo markings &c.? All I've found in the docs and from pieces > > on mutopia.org is ad-hoc font setti

Editoral vertical brackets

2004-02-23 Thread Reuben Thomas
How can I draw editorial brackets [ ] around some notes? [I'd like to take this opportunity to thank everyone for putting up with a tsunami of email over the past couple of days; thanks to all your help I'm now starting to trundle along quite happily typesetting, and the remaining few problems I'm

Musica ficta again

2004-02-23 Thread Reuben Thomas
I read the archives, and since there's no proper support for musica ficta, I'm quite happy with the 2002 solution: #(define fictaflat '(music "accidentals--1")) #(define fictanat '(music "accidentals-0")) #(define fictasharp '(music "accidentals-1")) #(define smallsharp '((font-relative-size . -2)

Getting there with musica ficta

2004-02-23 Thread Reuben Thomas
OK, I'm nearly there, my remaining problems are Scheme problems I think (I know a bit of elisp, but no Scheme up to now). I have the following: #(def-markup-command (fictasharp) () "Foo" (#:musicglyph "accidentals-2")) which doesn't parse. I think the problem is my empty argument type list. ??

Musica ficta done

2004-02-23 Thread Reuben Thomas
By googling I eventually found some more code examples that enabled me to complete the code for LilyPond 2.1.26: % Musica ficta #(def-markup-command (fictasharp paper props) () (interpret-markup paper props (markup #:musicglyph "accidentals-2"))) #(def-markup-command (fictaflat paper props) ()

Longa with long stem

2004-02-24 Thread Reuben Thomas
I had a look through the manual, but I can't seem to find a \longa with a longer tail, such as I have often seen. Also, one whose tail follows the usual rules (i.e. on the bottom line, I'd expect the tail to go up; or is that wrong? I'm copying from a handwritten score, so it might be at fault...).

Overriding staff properties globally

2004-02-24 Thread Reuben Thomas
How can I make a change such as \override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'mensural apply to every staff in a piece without having to repeat it everywhere? I'd like something I can just put once at the top of a file. -- http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ partisan, n. an adherent without sense

Old style time signature for 4/2

2004-02-24 Thread Reuben Thomas
I'm not very strong on this sort of thing, so correct me if I'm wrong (I checked at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Neil_Hawes/theory10.htm), but in old scores, 4/2 time is often marked with a c-with-vertical-bar (same as 2/2). I just tried setting mensural time signatures in 2.1.26, but t

Why is \skip 1*2 not the same as \skip 1 \skip 1?

2004-02-24 Thread Reuben Thomas
I am inserting gaps in lyrics, and I need to use \skip 1 \skip 1 ... repeatedly. If I enter \skip 1*5, it behaves the same as \skip 1*2. I'm using 2.1.27. -- http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ | art, n. romanticized mundanity ___ Lilypond-user mailin

Problem with spacing of \markup on \skips vs on notes

2004-02-24 Thread Reuben Thomas
If you try the following example on 2.1.27: \score { \notes { s1^\markup "Verylongtext"\f a'1^\markup "Verylongtext"\f } } you find that in the first bar, the f and "Verylongtext" are centred on each other, whereas in the second bar, they are left aligned. This causes me problems whe

Re: non-relative relative mode?

2004-02-26 Thread Reuben Thomas
> I attempted to use \relative c'', but found that mode to be much too > unpredictable for my tastes. It's entirely predictable: if a note a up to a fourth from the previous one, you don't need a ' or a ,; otherwise, you need one (or more) comma or tick. What's the problem? -- http://www.mupsy

Bar numbers missing if page doesn't start on bar boundary

2004-03-06 Thread Reuben Thomas
If a page break occurs half-way through a bar, because I have something like: \time 4/2 a1 \bar ":" a1 | then no bar number is printed on the page that starts half-way through a bar. Is this a bug? It seems that either page-breaks shouldn't occur in the middle of bars like this, or that a bar num

Re: Bar numbers missing if page doesn't start on bar boundary

2004-03-11 Thread Reuben Thomas
> In general, it's a bad idea to split bars across lines but sometimes > there is no better solution. Note that LilyPond will only do it if the > user manually has inserted a \bar command. So is there a way of making \bar commands non-breaking? I only used \bar because there was a dotted barline i

Re: measure numbers and line breaks

2004-03-13 Thread Reuben Thomas
> I didn't mean that it had to be implemented, only that if it is > implemented it has to be the number of the first bar in the line. We > agree on that, but I was trying to convince the original poster, who > presumably did not agree. I think I was the original poster, and I certainly do agree.