I apologize if this question has been asked before.
I want to write a full score for big band and somehow overcome the 15 staff
limit for midi playback. If I could merge the alto and tenor staves from 4 to
1, and do the same for trumpets and bones, I would have few enough staves for
midi output
> Hmmm, can't spot anything missing at
> the moment.
>
> Here's the entire test file.
>
> http://pastebin.com/pSu6Asge
>
Hi Alex!
Another noob here... Take a look at line 133. Looks like
you're missing a closing quote.
Regards,
Jeff
___
lilypond-us
Do I send crash reports to this list?___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The following music doesn't compile on the mac and causes a segfault on Linux.
Environments:
Mac OSX Lion
Ubuntu 12.04
LilyPond Versions
2.14.2-1 (mac)
2.14.2-2 (ubu from apt-get)
Command from ubu:
jbarnes@jbarnes-OptiPlex-780:~/mac/Documents/apc/music$ lilypond
WhenILookIntoYourHoliness.ly
GN
> It tends to feel like the classical case of "Somebody Else's Problem",
> and I am somewhat at a loss of how to deal with that without getting
> cynical to a degree that those who do support me don't deserve.
Man, I feel ya.
I started playing around with LilyPond recently. I like it. As someone
> Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
> something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
> it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
> twice.
Point taken. Won't happen again.
> Please read
> http://www.gnu.org/licen
> I suppose the situation might be as follows: source code is freely
> available (on website, github or whatever), but the binaries are not.
> Anyone tech-savvy enough to serve himself doesn't have to pay, but
> "simple users" do have. I think that if the price was low (say, 5$)
> nobody might be
Tim McNamara wrote;
> On May 24, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't your time be more wisely spent trying to get corporate sponsors? I
>> see a lot more success stories in the open source world where a corporation
>> donates developers to proje
David Kastrup wrote:
> Jeff Barnes writes:
>
>> I don't think that's necessarily applicable to Lily. The end
> product
>> being distributed is paper (or perhaps a pdf file). I don't think the
>> GPL extends to that, does it?
>
>
This snippet illustrates a problem I'm having. The tie on the g is in the wrong
direction after I've finished with the voice split. How do I get the correct
tie direction? It looks like the \voices are still in scope wrt ties.
Also, why did I lose the \relative c' after the voice split?
\score
Thanks for the replies, everyone.
David Kastrup wrote:
> \relative c' takes a music expression as an argument, and in this case,
> the argument is the parallel music << ... >>.
Interesting. Does \voiceXXX take a music expression too? If so, can I set the
bounds of the expression with {}?
> I
> From: Kieren MacMillan
>
>Hi David,
>
>> Who is going to learn reading notes, let alone writing them? Of course
>> LilyPond is only for geeks, because it is just geeks who bother with
>> writing music rather than listening to it.
>
>In other words, composers who use Lilypond are a [very, very
> From: Louis Guillaume
>> If I may start with a bit of humble philosophy, when I see a flat
>> 9 especially, I almost always conclude that the tonality will
>> include a sharp 9 as well, simply because of the dissonance that
>> would result from having the flat 9 competing against an
>>
> From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling
>
>On 30/05/12 02:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> One of the problems of LilyPond is that C++ had very poor support for
>> things we desperately need: reflection, automatic memory management
>> and callbacks.
>
>How about D?
Also, consider Qt. It has all of the abo
> From: Tim McNamara
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
>>> From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling
>>>
>>> On 30/05/12 02:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>>> One of the problems of LilyPond is that C++ had very poor support
> for
>
> From: Tim Roberts
>
> Jeff Barnes wrote:
>> While I'm sensitive to David's request to end the discussion for
> now, there are some misconceptions about Qt that need addressing.
>
> That's not entirely clear.
I don't think starting from here i
I think the problem (because I experienced it too with my first post) is that
it takes up to a day to subscribe to the list. No feedback in the list welcome
message, no bounced message in your mail box... You just never see it in the
list, so one tries the web UI, re-posting, anything to try to
Apparently, we can't do the following now because Lilypond needs a file to
process. (?) But the following looks like a nice feature to consider. And it
could mean some really cool scripts for a particular purpose could be written.
Or template files. Or (name your feature)...
$ cat 'my-melody-in
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Jeff Barnes writes:
>
>> $ cat 'my-melody-in-lily-note-syntax.txt' | ~/bin/fourwayclose.pl |
> lilypond
>
> $ echo '{ a b c }' | LANG= lilypond -o stdin -
What's the LANG env variable for?
Surely there is a template for the "Welcome to lilypond-user" e-mail that gets
sent out that could be edited to add "Your posts will appear after the
moderator approves your subscription. This could take up to a day."
Regards,
Jeff
>
> From: Janek Warchoł
>To:
20 matches
Mail list logo
