Haskell does not "deduce" what to include. You have to explicitly import each
module or no magic happens. Can't really see the big difference with #include
"stdio.h" and import Unix. The point is I believe that you are guaranteed that
what is linked is is is compatible with your declarations, th
Quoting Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> C is composed of two languages: the preprocessor, to which #include
>
> belongs, and merely composes the files into one compile unit, and
> the
> C compiler, which processes that. So the C language itself does not
>
> have any #include directive.
Quoting Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 18 May 2008, at 15:16, immanuel litzroth wrote:
>
> >> So the C language itself does not
> >> have any #include directive.
The C language standard is available at:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/doc
> C++ has the same preprocessor as C, and the same
> grammar sentence symbol,
> and a language subset. GCC has options for invoking the
> preprocessor and language proper separate
You can check the whole formal grammar of C++ processing on page 307 of the
standard. The "language proper" is a
Quoting Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It is of a formal grammar, since it odes not define a sentence
> symbol, nor does it specify context dependencies. For the formal
> definition of a grammar, see books on compiler construction, for
> example Waite & Goose, "Compiler Construction".
P
> The "man" page of 'gcc' has 62 occurrences of this word, the first
> one being:
>Some options control the preprocessor and others the compiler
> itself.
Once again answering a different question. You made a direct quote from
Stroustrups book. Could you tell me which page it is on instead
Lilypond doesn't work on Leopard as it did on Tiger.
I upgraded my system (install new system with keeping of
settings). If I try to run the unix commandline executables
I get the message
/bin/bash: /Users/immanuel/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond:
cannot execute binary file
> In 10.4, I have put LilyPond in /Applications/, and in my home
> directory, I have script created by say
>cat > lilypond
>exec /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond
> "$@"
> ^D
>chmod a+x lilypond
> (where ^D is -D). Then this LilyPond script can be run.
>
> D
> In 10.4, I have put LilyPond in /Applications/, and in my home
> directory, I have script created by say
>cat > lilypond
>exec /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond
> "$@"
> ^D
>chmod a+x lilypond
> (where ^D is -D). Then this LilyPond script can be run.
>
> Do
I tried to compile lilypond with the help of macports today and I don't
have much good news.
1) The guile in macports didn't seem to compile for me due to some errors
related to open64 and such. A downloaded guile had the same problem but I
hacked my way around that and got guile to compile.
2)
I logged some bugs with the macports people about guile
not installing. Don't know if that is fixed. Then I had an issue
where lilypond was trying to create fonts:
opt/local/bin/fontforge -script ../buildscripts/pfx2ttf.fontforge
/usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/VeraBd.pfb /usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/Ve
> Does this kind of FSF spam really belong to the lilypond-user
> mailing
> list (and to the lilypond-devel list, where it appeared too)?
Yes.
> I don't think so. Indeed, I consider sending campaigns to mailing
> lists without the mailinglist address at least in the to: or cc:
> headers as offen
All of the stuff I decided to sponsor (Ardour, GNU, Dawkins,
Wikipedia, Jacob Colier...) I sponsored through Paypal. For the
recipients getting 95% of the amount was still much better
than getting nothing. I would still sponsor Lilypond development
and have tried in the past but found it a lot hard
Midi standard does not include a snare roll. Many drum programs
do include it but it's not standardized.
Immanuel
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Steve Prud'Homme wrote:
> Hi, I really like this website :
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-05/msg00028.html
> where they explai
That won't sound like a roll, but like a machinegun :-)
If these things aren't prerecorded in your software it's really
hard to get a convincing roll.
Immanuel
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:52 PM, tisimst wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Steve Prud'Homme [via Lilypond] <[hidden
> e
I had the same problem, can't the configure script catch the wrong guile
version?
Immanuel
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> bb writes:
>
> > generate-documentation.log ends with this message:
> > "
> > ...
> > ...
> > ;;; compiling
> >
> /home/ich/lilypond-2.16.2/build/
Indeed, I had to do that too.
i
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> bb writes:
>
> > Compiled with guile 2.0.5 deinstalled and guile 1.8.8 installed. (1.8
> > and 2.0 are in the repository.)
> > make gives this:
> > "
> > ...
> > ranlib out/library.a || ar ts out/library.a
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:40 PM, bb wrote:
> clude/guile/2.0/**libguile
>
Did you reconfigure the source tree? It is still looking for guile under
2.0.
... /usr/include/guile/2.0/libguile.h',
i
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https
Here's a small example of something I started a while back -- it's
unfinished but should get you
going
Regards,
i
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Clark Milioti <
clark.mili...@officesystematics.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I just discovered LilyPond. I am blown away by the concept of its
> text
If there were some kind of make-dep for lilypond it could even generate
these dependencies
automaticaly, like it happens for C (the compiler generates dependencies
when passed the
correct flags). This should not be too hard to brew up?
Immanuel
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jacques Menu wrote
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 01/12/13 09:45, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Finale output is ugly to the degree where it is distracting readability,
>> particularly for instrumentalists. Sibelius' corporate parent has fired
>> its
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 01/12/13 14:56, immanuel litzroth wrote:
>
>> Here's a nice example.
>>
>
> That's almost certainly someone writing to full score (which has
> particula
>
>
> 2) The contention was that this stuff would be easier in Sibelius. Not
>> that you
>> can get it right there too.
>>
>
> Sibelius doesn't get things automatically right as well as Lilypond does,
> but it's usually much, much easier to correct or customize them when it
> doesn't give you what
This seems to do the wrong thing:
>
\version "2.19.81"
testme = #(define-music-function
(parser location music)
(ly:music?)
#{
\transpose c c' {#music } {#music }
#})
\testme g'
>
printing out two g'' instead of a g'' and a g'
Also I foun
This score gives a strange result (uses open string for the b and the e).
>
\version "2.19.81"
\language "english"
\new TabStaff {
\set TabStaff.minimumFret = #3
\relative c' {}
}
>
Am I doing something wrong? Is there a way to fix this?
Immanuel
tmp.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Thanks,
I also found that indicating string numbers works.
Immanuel
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 12:53 PM Malte Meyn wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.07.19 um 12:42 schrieb Immanuel Litzroth:
> > Am I doing something wrong? Is there a way to fix this?
>
> minimum-fret allows open strings b
I also miss numbers in variables and some kind of scoping for variables.
Immanuel
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:45 PM Maarten Deen wrote:
> Why are there no numbers allowed in variable names? I like to have some
> kind of descriptive name for parts of the scores that I make in
> Lilypond, and not ha
Hey Urs,
I'm willing to review the book. I'm a programmer with very good scheme/lisp
knowledge and I've been using lilypond for a number of years. I've written
some lilypond scheme functions but not that much. Let me know if I can be
of help.
Cheers,
Immanuel
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Urs L
I posted a message a while back to get point-and-click +preview working
in emacs a while back. It was titled "Point an Click & emacs", it requires
pdf-tools -- which you want anyway :-)
greetz,
i
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 9:18 AM Kenneth Flak
wrote:
> Thanks a lot, Ben! This seems to work very nice
-point-and-click
>>>> > I had to do that even though I'm not using GNOME or a DE at
>>>> > all. You don't have to use pdf-tools (although I agree with
>>>> > Immanuel it is
>>>> > very good and you probably want it) but I got it wo
s on this page
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/usage/configuring-the-system-for-point-and-click
>>>>> > I had to do that even though I'm not using GNOME or a DE at
>>>>> > all. You don't have
gt;
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2024, 1:09 AM Immanuel Litzroth <
> immanuel.litzr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> lilypond mode is not included in emacs by default (at least not up until
>> 30 prerelease).
>> What is included in org mode is support for org mode lilypond blocks:
>
Fair enough: "it" refers to the lilypond elisp code which provides
integration
between emacs and lilypond and utils for editing elisp code.
That code is installed by the lilypond installer.
Immanuel
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 6:17 PM waterhorsemusic
wrote:
> What is "it?"
>
> It is useful to edit me
ghc has a FFI for C and C++ can be made to generate C compatible code.
There is no way to use a C++ library in another runtime without writing a
big chunk of glue code.
Immanuel
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 6:31 PM Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 17 Mar 2025, at 11:01, Aura Kelloniemi wrote:
> >
> > I am
34 matches
Mail list logo
