Am 28.06.2008, 00:11 Uhr, schrieb Mats Bengtsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You may want to submit it to the LSR, though.
I did so with two examples.
but in the preview only one shows up. and when you click on the picture to
see the code, the full code is there.
on my PC (windows xp) this wo
2008/7/1, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I've approved the snippet using the first example
> (http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=490).
>
> This works perfectly.
Using http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/ you can search - e.g. for *upbeat* or *repeat
-* the snippet repository but you will not find
ng so big you can only
navigate trough it with an up-to-date tool!
Cheers
Eluze
Am 07.07.2008, 23:09 Uhr, schrieb Sebastiano Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Jul 7, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
Am 07.07.2008 um 00:44 schrieb Eluze Weehaeli:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/
May I report a personal impression I had reading the "Learning Manual":
In the chapeter "2.5.4 Absolute note names" people are scared off using
absolute pitches. What for? The given example of Mozart can easily be
written with few octave characters - 2 commas - in absolute mode:
{ \key a \m
Am 22.08.2008, 16:46 Uhr, schrieb Steve Dunlop
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I shall eagerly await the development of a script that will work in the
reverse direction.
Using \displayLilyMusic should give you the wanted absolute transformation!
(while writing this answer, I just saw Mats repsonse)
I
Am 27.08.2008, 10:41 Uhr, schrieb Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I wouldn't say that it would be a disaster; I still don't think that
it's been used enough to say that the loss would be *that* bad.
How can U use it if it is not available 99% of the time...(at least the
last 2 weeks)?
Am 27.08.2008, 11:02 Uhr, schrieb Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am 27.08.2008, 10:41 Uhr, schrieb Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I wouldn't say that it would be a disaster; I still don't think that
it's been used enough to say that the loss would be *that* bad.
How can U use i
for me it works (version 2.11.57, Windows XP SP3):
\relative c'' { \override TextSpanner #'dash-fraction = #0.7 b 1
\startTextSpan c e, \stopTextSpan }
\relative c'' { \override TextSpanner #'dash-fraction = #0.2 b 1
\startTextSpan c e, \stopTextSpan }
in case your code defines another
hi
when the notes of a chord are close problems with arpeggios arise
- \arpeggioNormal - the zigzag line cannot be recognised as such
- \arpeggioArrowUp - the arrow is below the chord, the zigzag line is missing
- \arpeggioArrowUp - the arrow is below the chord, the zigzag line is missing
- \arpeg
I've shared an item with you:
template.zip
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8upKzFlsy7GSE90U1BEZ1dBWG8&invite=CO-SubYI
It's not an attachment -- it's stored online at Google Docs. To open this
document, just click the link above.
___
lilypond-user
10 matches
Mail list logo