specify number of measures per line in score

2014-03-31 Thread Branko
I have this as a sample notation example. How would I specify to have exactly 4 measures per line, throughout the whole piece. I searched the whole documentation and did not find such a simple feature. Am I missing something? \version "2.18.2" % comment line \header { title = "Ruska narodna

Fwd: specify number of measures per line in score

2014-03-31 Thread Branko
Forwarded conversation Subject: specify number of measures per line in score From: *Branko* Date: 1 April 2014 02:06 To: lilypond-user@gnu.org I have this as a sample notation example. How would I specify to have exactly 4 measures per line, throughout the whole piece

Re: specify number of measures per line in score

2014-03-31 Thread Branko
On 1 April 2014 02:09, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Branko, > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Branko wrote: > >> I have this as a sample notation example. How would I specify to have >> exactly 4 measures per line, throughout the whole piece. I searched the >>

Re: specify number of measures per line in score

2014-03-31 Thread Branko
ok.. that did the trick, so I have to have both, function declared and ragged-right to do the job? is that right? thanks again for helping. On 1 April 2014 02:35, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Branko wrote: > >> >> >> actually it

Re: specify number of measures per line in score

2014-03-31 Thread Branko
..so if I had 16 measures, and I wanted to have four lines each spanning four measures (short exercise for my little students) what would be the best approach? On 1 April 2014 02:42, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Branko wrote: > >> ok.. t

shortcuts for righthand fingerings

2014-04-01 Thread Branko
when I use, #(define RH rightHandFinger) and then later, \RH #3, for example.. it works.. but I want to further enhance this so I tried: #(define RHm rightHandFinger #3) and then, \RHm, but that does not work.. What should I do to make that shortcut work? Thanks. _

2. volta - repetition problem

2014-04-02 Thread Branko
http://postimg.org/image/feebk5qp1/ please see my screenshot for a better picture of my problem. I know I can make repeats using: \repeat volta 2 { musicexpr } ,but my musicexpr is part of <<>> group because I have two voices.. and after that few measures continue as a separate music expr., so h

Re: 2. volta - repetition problem

2014-04-02 Thread Branko
Hi Mark, please see updated screenshot on http://postimg.org/image/eoc74bqkx/ I hope it's clear now what I want.. thanks! On 3 April 2014 01:50, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Branko, > > > > I have looked at your picture and read your message several times. I am > not sur

Re: 2. volta - repetition problem

2014-04-02 Thread Branko
just to clear up, what makes problem for me, is that 2. volta, as it is musicexpr in \alternative {} block, so how to put that now as a beginning of another repetition.. Don't know if I am clear enough.. On 3 April 2014 01:50, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Branko, > > > > I

Re: 2. volta - repetition problem

2014-04-03 Thread Branko
all, just what I get on paper. Thanks again, good community ;) On 3 April 2014 09:29, Robert Schmaus wrote: > Hi Branko, > > This works in Lilypond v2.18: > > \repeat volta 2 { c c c c } > \alternative{ > {d d d d} > { \bar ":..:" d d d d e e e e \bar &qu