The issue is consistency and I'm perhaps not using the terms precisely enough
to describe what I am seeing.
I understand about MIDI notes and that they are neither sharpened not
flattened, but each has their own value.
In my sequencer (Cakewalk ProAudio 9), if my piece has a Key Signature even
Dear list
I am trying to solve this problem about espressivos that stretches
over four beats. I have tried many versions but not seems to solve it
The c1 and the b4 c2 b4 bars work as I hoped for.
the b2 c2 bar and the a2~ a2 does not give the wished for results.
Can anybody help?
*
Giles Boardman writes:
> However, when I create new files, I am getting output that is as if I
> have chosen to write everything in C major, with all the flats and
> sharps shown explicitly. Nevertheless, the screen and pdf output are
> written in, for example G, with no sharps on the individual
mor...@borchorst.eu skrev den 2024-05-11 11:40:
Dear list
I am trying to solve this problem about espressivos that stretches
over four beats. I have tried many versions but not seems to solve it
The c1 and the b4 c2 b4 bars work as I hoped for.
the b2 c2 bar and the a2~ a2 does not give the
> On 10 May 2024, at 22:21, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2024, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> signature. The MIDI file does not contain that information; it is up to
>>> whatever software reads the MIDI file, to display it appropriately.
>>
>> So to go back to staff notation f
On Sat, 11 May 2024, Giles Boardman wrote:
> When I create MIDI output from Lilypond, if I have imported a MIDI file and
> then resaved it with changes made in LilyPond, the output is like that, too.
Lilypond as such does not import MIDI files. I think you must be using
some piece of software ot
Thank you for your efforts, Matt, and everyone else who has spent any time
looking into this.
To answer Matt, I did use Midi2ly by way of Frescobaldi and I must also have
previously found a way to run a command line batch (if only a repetitive list)
because I have way to many files to have done
Hi Morten,
Here’s one approach:
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
esp = \markup \lower #1 \scale #'(1.375 . 1) \musicglyph #"scripts.espr"
stuff = \relative {
\time 4/4
r4 b'4 a2-\tweak self-alignment-X #-1.25 _\esp ~
a2 b4 4(
c1)-\tweak self-alignment-X #-0.5 _\esp
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca writes:
> On Sat, 11 May 2024, Giles Boardman wrote:
>
>> When I create MIDI output from Lilypond, if I have imported a MIDI file and
>> then resaved it with changes made in LilyPond, the output is like that, too.
>
> Lilypond as such does not import MIDI files. I think y
Hi Steph,
I'm not an expert with the \featherDurations interface, but this:
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 3:53 PM Steph Phillips
wrote:
>
> \once \override Beam.grow-direction = #LEFT
> \featherDurations 6/4 { d16[-. d-. d-. d-. d-. d]-. } |
>
seems to disagree with how the tutorial describes it:
htt
On Sat, 11 May 2024, Giles Boardman wrote:
> I have now been more systematic in my approach and conclude that \key is not
> reflected in MIDI output. I tried various positions for events and in each
Well, it definitely is reflected in the output in my own tests. The
example code I posted, when r
You are, of course, right. Your evidence is clear. The position of the \key
command seems a strong candidate but I can't get it into the .MID even in the
simplest of snippet.
As I mentioned I also have other behaviour I can't explain so it could also be
version related. I reinstalled the latest
Hello,
I have frequently encountered the situation where I want to have
feathered durations within a specified duration -- e.g., a crotchet, or
a minim, or a breve. This is the code I've come up with:
\once \override Beam.grow-direction = #RIGHT
\featherDurations #(ly:make-moment 1/2)
\t
On 2024-05-11 15:18, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
Hi Morten,
Here’s one approach:
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
esp = \markup \lower #1 \scale #'(1.375 . 1) \musicglyph #"scripts.espr"
stuff = \relative {
\time 4/4
r4 b'4 a2-\tweak self-al
Hi Mats,
> On May 11, 2024, at 11:51 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I would rather do something like the following
I started down that path, but when I saw that the output was
I realized it would take far too much manual tweaking to make it visually
attractive, whereas my \esp version gives
with
Here’s one approach:
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
esp = \markup \lower #1 \scale #'(1.375 . 1) \musicglyph #"scripts.espr"
stuff = \relative {
\time 4/4
r4 b'4 a2-\tweak self-alignment-X #-1.25 _\esp ~
a2 b4 4(
c1)-\tweak self-alignment-X #-0.5 _\esp
b2-\tw
Hi Vaughan,
Am 10.05.24 um 07:44 schrieb Vaughan McAlley:
Hi,
I have a text spanner function that shows a player that they are
playing in simultaneous rhythm with one or more other players. I
adapted it from code I used for indicating colouration in renaissance
music. It works fine, but if it b
So after a little toying around with the suggestions from this thread,
I've come up with the following:
\once \override TupletNumber.text = \markup { \note-by-number #1 #0 #UP
}
\once \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##t
\once \override TupletBracket.v
Giles Boardman writes:
> You are, of course, right. Your evidence is clear. The position of the \key
> command seems a strong candidate but I can't get it into the .MID even in the
> simplest of snippet.
>
> As I mentioned I also have other behaviour I can't explain so it could also
> be versi
On 11/05/24 01:59, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Raphael,
However, the chord names are mono-spaced; they are not spaced
according to their durations. So that if, for instance, I have {ef2
ef4:maj7 ef4:7} then each symbol occupies the same amount of space on
the line. The first chord does not
On Sat 11 May 2024 at 15:14:47 (+), Giles Boardman wrote:
> You are, of course, right. Your evidence is clear. The position of the \key
> command seems a strong candidate but I can't get it into the .MID even in the
> simplest of snippet.
>
> As I mentioned I also have other behaviour I can'
On Sat 11 May 2024 at 16:06:00 (+0200), N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
> (the stickler in me would complain that tuplets should always indicate a
> shortening of length, and this is technically putting six sixteenths in the
> space of eight, but I guess the feathering overrules that)
I tickles me that I s
22 matches
Mail list logo