Hello Dirck,
you might be interested in something I recently made for music SE. Essentially
this will add two new engravers that automatically annotate the string tuning
whenever it changes.
Cheers,
Valentin\version "2.24"
% Used for printing the actual changes. A procedure that takes the tuni
Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write
this now incorrect code:
a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]] i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined
by a single beam.
I have looked at NR 1,2,4
TIA,
Paul
Le lundi 08 avril 2024 à 09:22 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit :
> Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I write
> this now incorrect code:
>
> a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]] i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes joined
> by a single beam.
>
> I have looked at NR 1,2,4
A litt
On 08.04.24 18:22, Paul Scott wrote:
Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I
write this now incorrect code:
a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]] i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes
joined by a single beam.
The question is: what is the context and why do you want this?
Nor
On 4/8/24 9:46 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 08.04.24 18:22, Paul Scott wrote:
Many years ago I could nest square brackets in Lilypond. How can I
write this now incorrect code:
a16[[ 16 16] 16[ 16 16]] i.e. two groups of 3 beamed 16th notes
joined by a single beam.
The question is: what i
I'm using \transpose pretty heavily, and I'm running into an issue I don't
quite know how to solve. I'm aware of the \naturalizeMusic hack described
in the LilyPond documentation. I'm looking for something similar, but for
key signatures. When a \key specification gets transposed, I would like to
i
> I'm using \transpose pretty heavily, and I'm running into an issue I don't
> quite know how to solve. I'm aware of the \naturalizeMusic hack described
> in the LilyPond documentation. I'm looking for something similar, but for
> key signatures.
This was discussed in the past, for example I post
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:14 AM Paul Scott wrote:
>
> The case at the moment is with long groups of triplets of which the
> following is now a part:
>
> {
>\time 2/4
>\tuplet 3/2 8 {
> a'16 16 \set stemRightBeamCount = 1 16 \set stemLeftBeamCount = 1
> 16 16 16
>}
> }
>
> I think
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:51 PM Carl Sorensen
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:14 AM Paul Scott
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The case at the moment is with long groups of triplets of which the
>> following is now a part:
>>
>> {
>>\time 2/4
>>\tuplet 3/2 8 {
>> a'16 16 \set stemRightBeamCo
Fortunately I always use the latest development version. I'll try this in a
while.Thank you!Paul Sent from my Galaxy
Original message From: Carl Sorensen
Date: 4/8/24 4:00 PM (GMT-07:00) To: Paul Scott
Cc: Simon Albrecht ,
Lilypond-User Mailing List , Jean Abou Samra
Subj
10 matches
Mail list logo
