Re: Replace with red dot

You are doing << { c'2. } \new Voice { \redDotMultiMeasureRest R1 } >> but a 3/4 measure only has length 2. . So do << { c'2. } \new Voice { \redDotMultiMeasureRest R2. } >> instead. While you are at it: You can directly boxify the stencil using box-stencil without going the extra way over a

Re: \markup text outside Lyrics - how?

Why not use text marks, http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/text-marks ? They are intended exactly for textual indications that should appear at the top of each system, i.e. above the lyrics in your case. Because I wasn't aware of their existence :) They work just nicely ...

Re: Replace with red dot

Thank you sooo much for your answer! That’s amazing, it’s really clear and I’ll take a deep look at it! What is MusicSE? I cannot find anything on google. Can u point me out to the reference u said? Cheers! > On 3 Oct 2023, at 09:15, Valentin Petzel wrote: > > You are doing > > << { c'2. } \

Re: Replace with red dot

 (I believe you meant to post in the thread "barlines in proportional notation disappear".) > Le 3 oct. 2023 à 11:41, Cordelia a écrit : > What is MusicSE? I cannot find anything on google. Can u point me out to the > reference u said? "Music StackExchange", the site where you also posted y

Re: Overwrite key signature with numbers

Thanks a lot Valentin, that's simply perfect! However, after reading a lot of the documentation I think I would have never been able to find any solution close to yours. I am very confused with a few things, and I can't find the answers in the documentation. Let me ask you a few questions in hope

Re: Overwrite key signature with numbers

Robert Mengual writes: > Oh David's right, if the music ends with no alterations it is printing the > key cancellation, even when it has been explicitely set to false.[image: > image.png] > What can I do in this case? I would like to keep the number+alteration but > remove the 7 natural signs bef

Re: Overwrite key signature with numbers

Damn it, turns out the key engraver has an hardcoded path to always create Key Cancellations for keys with no alteration. So one would need to do \override KeyCancellation.stencil = ##f which is of course a bit wonky as compared to telling Lilypond to not create Cancellations in the first plac

Re: Overwrite key signature with numbers

Am Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2023, 12:55:21 CEST schrieb Robert Mengual: > Thanks a lot Valentin, that's simply perfect! > > However, after reading a lot of the documentation I think I would have > never been able to find any solution close to yours. I am very confused > with a few things, and I can't

Re: barline in proportional notation disappear

> Thank you sooo much for your answer! > That’s amazing, it’s really clear and I’ll take a deep look at it! > What is MusicSE? I cannot find anything on google. Can u point me out to the > reference u said? > Cheers! As Jean said it is the music stackexchange thing. You’ve accidently replied t

Re: Overwrite key signature with numbers

Oh David's right, if the music ends with no alterations it is printing the key cancellation, even when it has been explicitely set to false.[image: image.png] What can I do in this case? I would like to keep the number+alteration but remove the 7 natural signs before that. Thank you, Robert El lu

Re: Overwrite key signature with numbers

Valentin Petzel writes: > Damn it, turns out the key engraver has an hardcoded path to always create > Key > Cancellations for keys with no alteration. > > So one would need to do > > \override KeyCancellation.stencil = ##f > > which is of course a bit wonky as compared to telling Lilypond to n

`\paper`-only variables

Do we have a list of variables that only have an effect if set in `\paper` (and not in `\layout`)? Werner

Re: `\paper`-only variables

> Le 3 oct. 2023 à 15:03, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > >  > Do we have a list of variables that only have an effect if set in > `\paper` (and not in `\layout`)? What do you want this for?

Re: `\paper`-only variables

>> Do we have a list of variables that only have an effect if set in >> `\paper` (and not in `\layout`)? > > What do you want this for? I'm working on issue https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1392 (but not for the IR but as an appendix for the NR) and I would like to avoid writing th

Re: `\paper`-only variables

> Le 3 oct. 2023 à 16:59, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > >  >>> Do we have a list of variables that only have an effect if set in >>> `\paper` (and not in `\layout`)? >> >> What do you want this for? > > I'm working on issue > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1392 (but not for the

Re: `\paper`-only variables

>> I'm working on issue >> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/1392 (but not for the IR >> but as an appendix for the NR) and I would like to avoid writing the >> sentence >> >> `foo` may also be specified in `\layout` blocks >> >> again and again. I could imagine that the opposite, n

Re: `\paper`-only variables

> Le 3 oct. 2023 à 17:20, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > > Is this your next bigger LilyPond cleanup project? :-) Maybe. I have much less time for LilyPond this year and I'm still not done with fonts. After that, we'll see. But if someone else tackles it I'll be quite happy.

Re: Replace with red dot

Oh yes. Thank you so much Valentin. Also I will remember to format the code better next time. On 10/3/2023 12:15 AM, Valentin Petzel wrote: You are doing << { c'2. } \new Voice { \redDotMultiMeasureRest R1 } >> but a 3/4 measure only has length 2. . So do << { c'2. } \new Voice { \redDotMult