On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Peter Toye wrote:
Don't ask me - I just went to the download link at http://www.smufl.org/fonts/
:)
I'll try the Steinberg site - thanks for the pointer.
Inspired by this thread I found out that on my Linux Fedora system I can
simply install the Steinberg Bravura fonts
Hi,
Attached is a picture from two 8va variants I found in the Bravura font.
Using LilyPond with the following tiny example:
\version "2.19.83"
\relative {
\ottava #1 f'' f f f |
\ottava #-1 f,, f f f |
}
will result in "8va" (above) and "8vb" (below)
I would like to accomplish two thing
Hi Martin,
AFAIK all of this can be done, yes. However, it’s a bit hacky and will
be much easier in the not yet published 2.21.0 which will have improved
ottava brackets.
Am 28.11.19 um 10:36 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen:
- 8va above the staff with the "va" superscripted like in the attached
pn
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Malte Meyn wrote:
The new default will be numbers only (#ottavation-numbers) with a simple
option to use super-/subscript "8va" with a both for alta and bassa:
\set ottavationMarkups = #ottavation-ordinals
I don’t know when 2.21.0 will be released. IIRC there ha
How about:
\version "2.19.83"
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override OttavaBracket.stencil = #ly:line-spanner::print
\override OttavaBracket.bound-details =
#`((left . ((text . ,#{ \markup\concat\italic { "8" \raise #.8 \tiny
"va" } #})
(Y . 0)
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
How about:
\version "2.19.83"
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override OttavaBracket.stencil = #ly:line-spanner::print
\override OttavaBracket.bound-details =
#`((left . ((text . ,#{ \markup\concat\italic { "8" \raise #.8 \ti
Also available in the Arch Linux User Repository (AUR), currently at
otf-bravura version 1.271-1
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-bravura
But, if you're an Arch user, you probably figured all that out for
yourself, making this message a bit redundant. ;-)
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:40:12AM -0800, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2019-11-25 2:26 am, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> > I'm trying, for backward compatibility, to keep that
> > highlightOutOfRange function, is that possible ?
>
> What compatibility are you needing?
As I've used the old function in existi
On 2019-11-28 9:27 am, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:40:12AM -0800, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2019-11-25 2:26 am, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> I'm trying, for backward compatibility, to keep that
> highlightOutOfRange function, is that possible ?
What compatibility are you needing?
Hello,
given two pitches, for example: c' and c'', is there a way to automatically
generate all the pitches between them? In three different ways:
1) all the "white keys" between them: d' e' f' g' a' b'2) all the "black
keys" between them: des' ees' ges' aes' bes'3) all the pitches: des' d
- Forwarded message --
> From: David Pleydell
> To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 21:53:30 + (UTC)
> Subject: Simultaneous slurs inside a tuplet
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to write out some traditional flamenco guitar pieces in
> Lilypond. I have a situation where
-- Forwarded message --
> From: Werner LEMBERG
> To: pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 23:30:34 +0100 (CET)
> Subject: Re: horizontal position of rehearsal marks at start of system
>
> >> how can I control the default hori
On Thu 28 Nov 2019 at 21:53:30 (+), David Pleydell wrote:
> Hi
> I'm trying to write out some traditional flamenco guitar pieces in Lilypond.
> I have a situation where I must write legato (slurs) for two fingers
> simultaneously, inside a tuplet. I am using two staffs, a traditional one and
Hello Paolo,
what you want is doable in a Scheme "music function" that takes the two
pitches as input and returns a completed music expression.
However, for someone to help you out with that you should give more
clear indications how that result should look like, especially with
regard to du
14 matches
Mail list logo
