Am Sa., 26. Okt. 2019 um 04:45 Uhr schrieb Federico Sarudiansky
:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm typesetting a work which includes this single measure (here as a MWE) in
> a PianoStaff.
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> \score {
> \new PianoStaff {
>\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
><<
> \new Sta
Am Fr., 25. Okt. 2019 um 22:41 Uhr schrieb Leo Correia de Verdier
:
> I realized that defining the glissando gradient taking the stencil as point
> of departure, rather than the grob properties, makes it work for broken
> glissandi too. It was a quite minimal change.
>
> (gliss-gradient (/ (+ (-
Thomas Morley wrote:
As a workaround I'd enter an altered invisible Note in the inner Voice.
Another way is to apply
\once \override Arpeggio.extra-spacing-height = #(cons -inf.0 +inf.0)
just before the arpeggioed 8
That corresponds to Valentin's workaround in
https://sourceforge.net/p/
Thank you Thomas and Robin for the workarounds.
I think the beauty of the non-arpeggio case well worth a misbehaviour here,
if a short workaround is available and works like in this case.
Thanks again.
El sáb., 26 oct. 2019 a las 8:03, Robin Bannister ()
escribió:
> Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> >
Am Fr., 25. Okt. 2019 um 12:27 Uhr schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>
> What is the position tolerance distance for cross staff stems to work? Zero?
> Or is there some wriggle room?
>
> I ask because I have a complex (as always) bit of free form music with
> different overlapping tuplet ratios in differe
Hi Harm,
I think you may have written that for me originally! Now I found i again.
Thank you.
Andrew
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 at 03:31, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
> To push stuff around to get connectable Stems you may use my `pushNC´
> posted several times on this list.
>
>
