Here is an MWE showing my problem.
What I don’t understand is why and extra ‘_2’ is needed in lyricsManual to
obtain the same alignment as in the two automatic cases.
The snippet comes from Rameau’s Les Indes Galantes.
Thanks for your help!
JM
%%%
\version "2.19.83"
mu
Hi Vaughan,
On 27.08.19 04:40, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to convert a large choral project to 2.19. When I compile
with 2.19, melismas don't work at all. For example:
c'4 \melisma d' e' \melismaEnd f
puts a note on every syllable.
I made a MWE which works perfectly. Diffs betwe
Am 27.08.19 um 04:40 schrieb Vaughan McAlley:
I’m trying to convert a large choral project to 2.19. When I compile
with 2.19, melismas don't work at all. For example:
c'4 \melisma d' e' \melismaEnd f
puts a note on every syllable.
[…]
Does this ring a bell with anyone?
Yes, it does. Th
Am 27.08.19 um 10:56 schrieb Malte Meyn:
Yes, it does. The following two scores look the same in 2.18.2 and
different in 2.19.83:
This changed somewhere between 2.19.13 and 2.19.14. Without testing it
looks like commit df3457d8 “Allow \addlyrics to work with arbitrary
contexts” could be the r
On 2019-08-27 1:12 am, Jacques Menu wrote:
Here is an MWE showing my problem.
What I don’t understand is why and extra ‘_2’ is needed in
lyricsManual to obtain the same alignment as in the two automatic
cases.
[ . . . ]
It appears that you are trying to use both automatic and manual syllable
Hey all,
This bit me way back when. Here’s the fix (note the \new Voice):
\version "2.19.83"
global = {
s1
\bar "|."
}
sop = \relative {
c'4( d) e f
}
soptext = \lyricmode {
Me -- lis -- ma
}
\new Staff \new Voice << \global \sop >> \addlyrics \soptext
\new Staff \new Voice << \global \s
Hi David,
> I'm not sure that it does.
Did you compile my example?
The melisma shows correctly in both staves, where it doesn’t in the original
MWE.
Isn’t that what needed fixing?
Confused,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer (he/him)
‣ website: www.kierenmacmil
On Tue 27 Aug 2019 at 08:32:30 (-0400), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> This bit me way back when. Here’s the fix (note the \new Voice):
>
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> global = {
> s1
> \bar "|."
> }
>
> sop = \relative {
> c'4( d) e f
> }
>
> soptext = \lyricmode {
> Me -- lis -- ma
>
On Tue 27 Aug 2019 at 10:12:01 (+0200), Jacques Menu wrote:
> Here is an MWE showing my problem.
>
> What I don’t understand is why and extra ‘_2’ is needed in lyricsManual to
> obtain the same alignment as in the two automatic cases.
> The snippet comes from Rameau’s Les Indes Galantes.
>
> %%%
On Tue 27 Aug 2019 at 11:16:00 (-0400), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > I'm not sure that it does.
>
> Did you compile my example?
> The melisma shows correctly in both staves, where it doesn’t in the original
> MWE.
> Isn’t that what needed fixing?
>
> Confused,
Yes, but I'm not sur
Hi David,
> Just to make it clear—my reply was aimed at Malte's MWE
> and not at the OP who hasn't yet shown us what their problem is.
Ah, okay. =)
I was just noting (for the OP) that a whole bunch of my scores with lyrics
"stopped working" early in the 2.19s, and adding \new Voice before the
On Mon 26 Aug 2019 at 20:36:53 (+0200), Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Hi Jacques,
>
> this doesn’t exactly answer your question, but I’ve always found that
> manual alignment of lyrics is a huge pain to get working and thus
> never use it…
The only piece I've used them in was as an exercise in writing
Hello everybody,
beams on cue notes are thinner and closer to each other than on regular
notes. The same is, however, not the case for tremolo beams.
Since one has to add them manually to quotedCueEventTypes, am I even
right in including them in the cue? I feel like they should be there,
sin
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, 02:22 Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > Just to make it clear—my reply was aimed at Malte's MWE
> > and not at the OP who hasn't yet shown us what their problem is.
>
> Ah, okay. =)
>
> I was just noting (for the OP) that a whole bunch of my scores with lyrics
> "sto
> beams on cue notes are thinner and closer to each other than on
> regular notes. The same is, however, not the case for tremolo beams.
> [...]
This is issue #5506; see commit
9c0e1363accceec8a686c868a6a5e5340317c331
Werner
___
lilypond-user
On Tue 27 Aug 2019 at 12:21:39 (-0400), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > Just to make it clear—my reply was aimed at Malte's MWE
> > and not at the OP who hasn't yet shown us what their problem is.
>
> Ah, okay. =)
>
> I was just noting (for the OP) that a whole bunch of my scores with
On 28.08.19 06:03, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
beams on cue notes are thinner and closer to each other than on
regular notes. The same is, however, not the case for tremolo beams.
[...]
This is issue #5506; see commit
9c0e1363accceec8a686c868a6a5e5340317c331
Oh good, thanks for taking care of i
17 matches
Mail list logo
