I saw this a few years ago in relation to hiding nested tuplet brackets.
It's back. Using 2.19.82 on Ubuntu 18.10, suddenly my 90 page string
quartet score of 11,000 lines fails with a core dump. This is only 90 pages
of 250, so I am quite concerned. This occurred after I aggregated four
smaller c
Andrew Bernard writes:
> I saw this a few years ago in relation to hiding nested tuplet brackets.
>
> It's back. Using 2.19.82 on Ubuntu 18.10, suddenly my 90 page string
> quartet score of 11,000 lines fails with a core dump. This is only 90 pages
> of 250, so I am quite concerned. This occurred
Hi all,
I wonder if there is an option to set a staff-padding value for hairpins? I
cannot find it, I would like to change the default distance of the hairpins
which I find a bit to close to the staves.
Here is an example:
\relative c {
\time 3/4
\clef bass
| r4..^"too closed" fis'16~\> 4
Hi there,
> I wonder if there is an option to set a staff-padding value for hairpins?
You mean separate from the whole DynamicLineSpanner?
Also, please post examples that compile without errors. =)
Thanks,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kier
Kieren MacMillan wrote
> Also, please post examples that compile without errors. =)
Oups, yes, here it is:
\version "2.19.82"
\relative c {
\time 3/4
\clef bass
| r4..^"too closed" fis'16~\> 4
| f(\! e) --
| (\< 2)\!
| 4( )
| g4.( fis8) 4
}
\relative c {
\time 3/4
\clef bas
Hi all,
in a project with 600+ short scores (mostly single systems) I have an
issue with the beam/stem formatting, in so far as the stems tend to be
too short when multiple beams are present (at least that's what the
commissioners complained about). When looking at the documentation of
Beam I
Is it possible to use Beam.skip-quanting, but only when no beam touches
the staff symbol?
I have found a setting that seems to give pretty good results with
\override Stem.details.beamed-minimum-free-lengths = #'(2 2.5 2.5)
\override Beam.damping = 10
However, by default that can produ
Hi all,
I have been searching on the net and forums to find an answer before
throwing this message.
Numbering bars is pretty straightforward. Now, I find it useful to also
label parts of a score using letters (I do this using markups). This is
really useful when rehearsing with a band, so everyone
On 3/19/19, Guy Melançon wrote:
> Numbering bars is pretty straightforward. Now, I find it useful to also
> label parts of a score using letters (I do this using markups).
Greetings,
I assume you know about \mark ? That’s what it’s for:
http://lilypond.org/doc/latest/Documentation/notation/writin
On 3/19/19, foxfanfare wrote:
> I adjust them every time, but it's annoying and I was wondering if I wasn't
> simply missing a setting for the distance between those lines and the
> staff?
You could try something like:
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override DynamicLineSpanner.outside-st
10 matches
Mail list logo
