Hallo Jan-Peter,
Thanks for the clarification. I had hoped it would be possible in some
other way. Hopefully it will be possible in a future version of the EE.
Until then I'll do it the old-fashioned way (manually).
Auke
Op 15 augustus 2018 07:50:57 schreef Jan-Peter Voigt :
Hello Auke,
make LILYPOND_BRANCH=somebranch lilypond does pull from the git branch
specified. I believe a simple make lilypond will pull from master, but I'm
not absolutely certain.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Engraver"
To: "Phil Holmes" ;
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 7:56
> On 15 Aug 2018, at 00:59, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Am 15.08.2018 um 00:34 schrieb Hans Åberg:
>>> On 14 Aug 2018, at 21:31, Urs Liska wrote:
>>>
>>> Could someone please test (or tell me directly) whether it makes a
>>> difference if a path passed to -I has a trailing slash or not on Mac?
>> It
Thank you for your reply!
Is there a command like \startStaff to set the staff type back to the
previouse one, if i am in a nested staff type construction?
Some thing which would have the effect of the following example for
example:
\version "2.19.80"
\new Staff \with { \accepts RhythmicStaf
To clarify what i mean, i was wondering if there is a command to set the
staff type back to the last one just at any point, or do i have to set a
\new PreviousStaff each time i want to cancel the current staff out and
continue with the last one?
Thank you,
Amir Teymuri writes:
> Thank you for
David Wright writes:
> On Tue 14 Aug 2018 at 21:31:18 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> it seems LilyPond on Windows requires paths passed to the -I command
>> line option to have a trailing slash while LilyPond on Linux doesn't
>> seem to care whether there is or not (see
>> https://gi
> On 15 Aug 2018, at 17:05, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> C++11 would give us I think? Which should be
> good for most path manipulations. At least I think so.
It was added in C++17 [1]. GCC 7 or later have -std=c++17. GCC 6 or later have
C++14 as default, without the -std option.
1. https://e
Hans Åberg writes:
>> On 15 Aug 2018, at 17:05, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> C++11 would give us I think? Which should be
>> good for most path manipulations. At least I think so.
>
> It was added in C++17 [1]. GCC 7 or later have -std=c++17. GCC 6 or
> later have C++14 as default, without the
> On 15 Aug 2018, at 18:44, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg writes:
>
>>> On 15 Aug 2018, at 17:05, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> C++11 would give us I think? Which should be
>>> good for most path manipulations. At least I think so.
>>
>> It was added in C++17 [1]. GCC 7 or later hav
Hello all,
Several years ago David Nalesnik very kindly and generously created a
Scheme script that would automatically apply ottava markings to a
score when needed (according to my own instrument definitions). I
needed this function because my Lilypond scores are all generated
automatically by my
On 8/15/2018 12:23 PM, David Bellows wrote:
I emailed David several days ago but haven't heard from him. I'm not
sure if it was a good email address or if he's just not available
these days. In any case, I'm hoping someone on the list can spot the
problem and offer up a solution. I've attached a
On Wed 15 Aug 2018 at 10:07:11 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 15 Aug 2018, at 00:59, Urs Liska wrote:
> >
> > Am 15.08.2018 um 00:34 schrieb Hans Åberg:
> >>> On 14 Aug 2018, at 21:31, Urs Liska wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Could someone please test (or tell me directly) whether it makes a
> >>> d
David Bellows wrote
> The following works as intended:
>
> or
>
> 4
>
> but these produce errors:
>
> \f or
>
> 4\f
>
> The error message:
>
> GNU LilyPond 2.19.82
> Processing `auto-ottava.ly'
> Parsing...auto-ottava.ly:24:15: In procedure ly:pitch-steps in
> expression (ly:pitch-steps p):
Sorry, certainly more straight-forward way would be just to use (filter
(music-type-predicate 'note-event) to filter out the note-events only:
(let* ((elts (filter (music-type-predicate 'note-event)
(ly:music-property mus-expr 'elements)))
[…]
au
> On 15 Aug 2018, at 21:49, David Wright wrote:
>
> On Wed 15 Aug 2018 at 10:07:11 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>> Also, it seems it adds the directory before the current in the call
>> argument. Normally in compilers, one would expect -I to only affect input
>> directives occurring in files
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: David Bellows
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 10:23:41 -0700
> Subject: Auto-ottava Scheme script problems
> Hello all,
> ...
>
> So I've been using that function daily for years and it works
> wonderfully. Just recently, however, I started working on a
On 8/15/18, 11:23 AM, "David Bellows" wrote:
The following works as intended:
or
4
but these produce errors:
\f or
4\f
Have you tried
-\f or
4-\f
HTH,
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
l
Elaine Alt:
> But it does make me wonder whether it would work if you structured your score
> a bit differently?
> For example,
> <>\f
> <>\f 4
Carl Sorensen:
> Have you tried
> -\f or
> 4-\f
Neither of those two approaches worked.
The spacer method would work but it adds a lot of compl
Sorry everyone, it's been too long since I've used the list and forgot
to reply to all. Below is a message sent earlier indicating that
Torsten's fix solved my problem.
Thanks everyone,
Dave Bellows
Torsten, thank you very much! That seems to fix my test cases. I have
absolutely no idea what's go
On Wed 15 Aug 2018 at 22:40:57 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
>
> > On 15 Aug 2018, at 21:49, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 15 Aug 2018 at 10:07:11 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
> >>
> >> Also, it seems it adds the directory before the current in the call
> >> argument. Normally in compilers, on
20 matches
Mail list logo
