Hello folks,
In 23c-Tuplet-Display-NonStandard.xml, part of the unofficial LP MusicXML
suite, there’s:
C
5
136
1
eighth
3
2
breve
* Torsten Hämmerle, torsten.haemme...@web.de [05/04/18 20:48]:
> A missing bold font can be emulated by printing the stencil several times
> (slightly shifted) - like in Don E. Knuth's "poor man's bold" (TeX).
>
> If you get stuck, don't hesitate to ask.
OK, here is an ugly solution (font experts
On 06.04.2018 07:21, Walter Garcia-Fontes wrote:
I already showed her different alternatives, that we found around for
hand writing fonts, both free and commercial, but her bosses are
stubborn to use that one, which is used in schools here in Spain, and
so they are used to it.
Why not use a sim
On 06.04.2018 01:46, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Hi Simon and Filip,
The Bach MS in question is a handwritten autograph - not an engraving.
I’m certainly aware of that – it was just for brevity that I didn’t make
it explicit.
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-u
Thank you for your comments David.
If I understand correctly what you are implying, maybe learning lilypond in
order to engrave complex piano music isn't a such good idea after all?
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
___
Hi Walter,
If you must use that font for educational purposes in Spain, here is a page
that has a normal version and a black (negra) of Escolar, which as far as I
can see is the same font.
http://www.edu.xunta.gal/centros/ceipfrions/es/node/101
You may want more black than this, but the contrast
Don’t be scared! It’s not the easiest way to start learning LilyPond,
but from what I’ve seen on this list, you got pretty far and all the
remaining issues can be solved. Just be assured that other types of
music (e.g. songs, violin parts or even choir scores) are usually easier.
Cheers,#
Joram
Hi foxfanfare,
I agree with David about piano music. In my work, principally what I do is
set very complex New Complexity School modernist scores for piano. It gets
really difficult. Not a task for beginners by any means.
But lilypond can be extended with functions and Scheme code and is so
power
Correction, latest is 2.19.81.
On 6 April 2018 at 19:19, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
>
> Oh, and do use the latest development version (2.19.18),
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 6. April 2018 11:09:09 MESZ schrieb foxfanfare :
>Thank you for your comments David.
>
>If I understand correctly what you are implying, maybe learning
>lilypond in
>order to engrave complex piano music isn't a such good idea after all?
No, it *is* a good idea.
What you should read out of Dav
* Simon Albrecht, simon.albre...@mail.de [06/04/18 10:53]:
> Why not use a similar, but better, font without telling them? Maybe they
> won’t notice, or if they will, maybe it will be a positive reaction, or if
> not, you have good arguments at hand for telling them why your alternative
> is better
Hi Walter,
2018-04-06 9:49 GMT+02:00 Walter Garcia-Fontes :
> * Torsten Hämmerle, torsten.haemme...@web.de [05/04/18 20:48]:
>> A missing bold font can be emulated by printing the stencil several times
>> (slightly shifted) - like in Don E. Knuth's "poor man's bold" (TeX).
>>
>> If you get stuck
Hello Lukas-Fabian,
I use LilyDev 4 (Debian 8), on which LilyPond builds seamlessly off the shelf.
It’s easy to copy your user configuration files to this version of Linux.
HTH!
JM
> Le 5 avr. 2018 à 22:24, Karlin High a écrit :
>
> On 4/5/2018 1:48 PM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
>> I would b
Walter Garcia-Fontes wrote
> [...] but her bosses are stubborn to use that one, which is used in
> schools here in Spain, and so they are used to it.
Hi Walter,
Everything Andrew said is exactly how I feel about it.
But I can see the point that Escolar is intended for didactic use (hence the
name
All right! Thank you for all your encouraging comments. So I'll continue my
efforts in learning this awesome but complex software. I have two weeks of
vacations coming on, so more time to figure it out!
Unfortunately, I have to start learning with this kind of piano piece
because 95% of my work ar
Walter Garcia-Fontes writes:
> * Andrew Bernard, andrew.bern...@gmail.com [06/04/18 04:35]:
>>
>> If you need to find a proper fonts, I'd be very happy to assist you to
>> locate something that is similar to the one you have to work with. Can you
>> convince the customer to use something better?
Walter Garcia-Fontes writes:
> * Simon Albrecht, simon.albre...@mail.de [06/04/18 10:53]:
>> Why not use a similar, but better, font without telling them? Maybe
>> they won’t notice, or if they will, maybe it will be a positive
>> reaction, or if not, you have good arguments at hand for telling t
David Kastrup wrote
> It may be that the "prescribed" music font here similarly is a
> same-purpose clone of something saner in which case a replacement will
> quite likely go unnoticed anyway.
In this very special case there is an unparalleled mismatch between upper
and lower case letters:
The up
Hi foxfanfare,
On 6 April 2018 at 20:51, foxfanfare wrote:
>
> BTW, does anyone have the answer to my question about this slur problem :
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t5604/Brahms03.png
For this, the convention is to post what is known as a Minimal Working
Example (MWE). Then
On April 5, 2018 at 7:46 PM Andrew Bernard wrote: I guess it's a bit like LilyJazz. Jazz people seem to want engraved scores to look like handwritten sheets done with a biro. But this always looks terribly 'faux' to me. Ha! I've always felt like jazz fonts (in general) where a strange and
I have spent a long time trying to find the answer to this, but without
success.
I have a piece with strings divided often into several parts; sometimes
these may not be even divisions, for instance where a four-part section
has instruments 3 and 4 playing the same music. I therefore need to
show
David Sumbler writes:
> I have spent a long time trying to find the answer to this, but without
> success.
>
> I have a piece with strings divided often into several parts; sometimes
> these may not be even divisions, for instance where a four-part section
> has instruments 3 and 4 playing the sa
Am 6. April 2018 12:51:07 MESZ schrieb foxfanfare :
>All right! Thank you for all your encouraging comments. So I'll
>continue my
>efforts in learning this awesome but complex software. I have two weeks
>of
>vacations coming on, so more time to figure it out!
>
>Unfortunately, I have to start lea
Hello,
I understand that you may not like how the stem looks, but my goal was to
preserve the organization of the notes in the manuscript which follows a
harmonious and logical pattern.
About Facebook and other social media, I could not agree more. I myself am not
in those websites. Social m
On 4/6/2018 10:57 AM, Filip May'r wrote:
Notwithstanding I think it would be better to find a different signature
because it may send a wrong idea about the intent.
He's been signing that way for so long that I think it's become a
Proverbs 22:28 ancient landmark.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
Am 06.04.2018 um 17:57 schrieb Filip May'r:
Notwithstanding I think it would be better to find a different signature
because it may send a wrong idea about the intent. Moreover, we are made
in the image of God who is upright and just and never does harm, and we
should seek to reflect that ima
Thanks for this response. I am ashamed to say that I spent several
hours trying to figure this out, but somehow I never got the syntax
quite right. Perhaps I'm getting too old for this...
David
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 16:09 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler writes:
>
> >
> > I have s
I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I
include on my individual parts. I'm finding that I get extraneous partial
tab clefs and lines placed in my output whenever a "TabStaff.minimumFret"
definition is found.
So I'm looking for a way have this fixed, or to do somethi
Dear Larry,
tags seem to work here: The problem occurs where you set TabStaff
properties. This setting should be removed when you have no TabStaff.
If you tag the line in melody:
\tag #'tab \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #0
and remove the tagged parts when using melody:
\new Staff { \remove
Filip May'r writes:
> Notwithstanding I think it would be better to find a different
> signature because it may send a wrong idea about the intent. Moreover,
> we are made in the image of God who is upright and just and never does
> harm,
"made in the image of God" is a notion from the Torah, as
Noeck writes:
> Dear Larry,
>
> tags seem to work here: The problem occurs where you set TabStaff
> properties. This setting should be removed when you have no TabStaff.
>
> If you tag the line in melody:
>
> \tag #'tab \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #0
>
> and remove the tagged parts when using m
Great solution. Thanks.
Larry M.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:23 AM Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2018-04-06 18:38 GMT+02:00 Larry Morandi :
> > I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I
> > include on my individual parts. I'm finding that I get extraneous partial
> > tab cle
Dear Larry,
please always reply to the list.
Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Larry Morandi:
> Thanks for your reply. You say that using tags works, but it doesn’t for me
> using the current stable release, 2.18.2. The output look exactly the same
> whether I use tags for not. Are you using 2.19.
Thank you, I got it. (I would have replied to the list, but the only button
that appeared on the page was to reply directly to you, and I only get
digests, which are hard to reply to.)
You are right it does work correctly. My fault.
Larry M.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:19 AM Noeck wrote:
> Dear
Hi David,
I am sorry, I still don’t get it.
Am 06.04.2018 um 19:21 schrieb David Kastrup:
> If you worry about extraneous contexts being created, don't create
> extraneous contexts.
There is no \new and no \context in Larry’s code. That’s what I thought
is called an implicit context creation (I
Am 06.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Seriously?
>
> \removeWithTag tab \new Staff { \melody }
Is that a remark to #'tab vs. tab or is there a benefit of putting
\removeWithTag before the \new Staff?
In the first case: that’s how it is explained in the docs:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2
Noeck writes:
> Am 06.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Seriously?
>>
>> \removeWithTag tab \new Staff { \melody }
>
> Is that a remark to #'tab vs. tab
Nope.
> or is there a benefit of putting \removeWithTag before the \new Staff?
If you worry about extraneous contexts being created
Dear bug-squad,
Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Noeck:
> #'tab vs. tab
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags
Btw, is it worth to change the docs and suggest the #'-less syntax to
users or rather not?
Joram
_
2018-04-06 18:38 GMT+02:00 Larry Morandi :
> I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I
> include on my individual parts. I'm finding that I get extraneous partial
> tab clefs and lines placed in my output whenever a "TabStaff.minimumFret"
> definition is found.
>
> So I
Noeck writes:
> Dear bug-squad,
>
> Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Noeck:
>> #'tab vs. tab
>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags
>
>
> Btw, is it worth to change the docs and suggest the #'-less syntax to
> users or rather not?
We
FoxFanFare,
I set Chopin's Nocturne No. 12.
Lilypond allowed me to arrange beams, fingerings, and dynamics to suit my
reading.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
foxfanfare
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 2:09
Nice!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi all,
Is there something strange about trying to reference the first beat of the
first bar of a piece of music. My mods are all working except the one on
the first beat of bar 1.
\editionMod global 1 0/4 gossec.simphonie.clarinetII.Voice etc...
Any ideas?
Craig
--
*Craig Dabelstein*
Ma
43 matches
Mail list logo
