Re: lyluatex inline question

Am 14.03.2018 um 00:14 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi all, So far lyluatex is working brilliantly for me. A question about setting a musical example inline. To make the staff smaller to match the surrounding text I need the inline-staffsize command but I can't get this example to work. \lil

Re: c#(+6 2)

On 12 March 2018 at 10:06, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > > On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Gianmaria Lari writes: >> >> > On 11 March 2018 at 10:58, David Kastrup wrote: >> > >> >> Then Scheme expressions written using # in the middle of music are >> >> expected to be music ex

Re: c#(+6 2)

Gianmaria Lari writes: > On 12 March 2018 at 10:06, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > >> >> >> On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>> From the "Extending LilyPond" guide: >>> >>> 1.2.1 LilyPond Scheme syntax >>> >>> >>> The Guile interpreter is part of LilyPo

Re: LilyPond Downloads broken?

You are correct on both counts. The SSH key wasn't copied over to the new server, and that's been a blessing since the account was compromised. Can you point the download link to lilypond.org directly? Bandwidth prices have gone down in the last 10 years, so I think we should be fine. On Wed, Ma

Re: LilyPond Downloads broken?

Am 14.03.2018 um 11:19 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: You are correct on both counts. The SSH key wasn't copied over to the new server, and that's been a blessing since the account was compromised. Can you point the download link to lilypond.org directly? Bandwidth prices have gone down in the las

Re: LilyPond Downloads broken?

- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" ; "Phil Holmes" Cc: "lilypond-user" ; "bug-lilypond" ; "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 10:21 AM Subject: Re: LilyPond Downloads broken? Am 14.03.2018 um 11:19 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: You are cor

Re: convert-ly path for Frescobaldi in Windows?

In Case this is useful to others, here is the Windows batch file I use to convert a large number of .ly files. Change LY_HOME to your taste: ---Start @echo off set LY_HOME=C:\Program Files (x86)\LilyPond-latest\usr for %%f in (%*) do ( echo Converting %%~nf... if exist %%~nf.orig ( del %%~n

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Noeck wrote > I like your "intermediate 3/4 pdf". > In a very large size (your pdf 400%) they look perfect to me. > It is hard to tell with the limited resolution of a monitor, but in > usual sizes (100%) they might be too much overlapping (i.e. still moving > a little bit towards version 4 might b

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Stefano Troncaro wrote > Hi Torsten, I'm undecided between the second and the third. Would it be > possible to compare them in a musical example? Hi Stefano, it took some time till I had a chance to compile the whole thing with different parameter settings, but here you go: Version 2: Abrahams e

Re: can the leading \markup command be eliminated in a new markup command?

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >> You either define an event function or a markup command. […] >> One is the markup, the other is a text script post event. Markups can >> be used in a variety of circumstances (as text scripts, as lyrics, as >> part of other markup, as tempo strings, as m

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

> Version 2: Abrahams equalized flats: > test-issue3356-condensed.pdf > > Thanks. And this is still my preferred version. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lil

Re: c#(+6 2)

On 14 March 2018 at 10:13, David Kastrup wrote: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > > > On 12 March 2018 at 10:06, Gianmaria Lari > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 12 March 2018 at 09:25, David Kastrup wrote: > >>> > >>> From the "Extending LilyPond" guide: > >>> > >>> 1.2.1 LilyPond Scheme syntax > >>> -

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Hi Torsten, I withdraw my vote for 3. When comparing your recent pdfs, I join Werner's statement. The bb and bbb glyphs just look too wide (4) or too thin/too overlapping (3) otherwise. I prefer the condensed form (version 2). Cheers, Joram ___ lilypo

Re: can the leading \markup command be eliminated in a new markup command?

Hi David, > Don't be too fast. I've created > […] > So you can replace the definition > > cue = > #(define-event-function (text) (markup?) > #{ ^\markup \bold #text #}) > > with > > cue = ^\markup \bold \etc YES! I tried that first (before my original post), and it didn’t work. Thank you so

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Dear all, After thorough considerations and evaluating your answers, I think I've chosen to implement Abraham's "equally condensed flats" proposal. Now that I've set up a proofsheet showing all Feta design sizes from 11 to 26 both in music examples and a uniformly scaled (artificial) proofing siz

Fwd: CTAN Update: lyluatex

Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: CTAN Announcements Gesendet: 14. März 2018 19:45:43 MEZ An: ctan-...@ctan.org Betreff: CTAN Update: lyluatex Jacques Peron submitted an update to the lyluatex package. Version: 1.0b 2018-03-12 License: mit Summary descriptio

The Power of Lilypond

Hi all, I thought some of you might like to see this document. It uses Scholarly, Lilyglyphs and lyluatex all in the ONE document. It's a huge leap forward! It has saved heaps of time and avoided the mess of multiple files and having to concatenate them together as a PDF. A huge thank you to all

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Am 14. März 2018 20:22:20 MEZ schrieb "Torsten Hämmerle" : >Dear all, .. > and others had nothing >negative >to say about it, either (except Urs, probably). Just stating that I don't have a strong opinion on that and will be fine with whatever solution you'll come up with. Urs _

Re: The Power of Lilypond

Craig, > I thought some of you might like to see this document. It uses Scholarly, > Lilyglyphs and lyluatex all in the ONE document. It's a huge leap forward! It > has saved heaps of time and avoided the mess of multiple files and having to > concatenate them together as a PDF. > […] The docum

Re: The Power of Lilypond

On 3/14/2018 4:13 PM, Craig Dabelstein wrote: Hi all, I thought some of you might like to see this document. It uses Scholarly, Lilyglyphs and lyluatex all in the ONE document. It's a huge leap forward! It has saved heaps of time and avoided the mess of multiple files and having to concatenat

Re: The Power of Lilypond

Dear Craig, this is so beautiful! Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Edition Engraver bug?

I wanted to let you know that I have tried the refactor-override branch and the overrides seem to be working fine! I do get a lot of warnings as you explained, but it does not appear the the EE overrides are getting overwritten, or maybe I'm misunderstanding your explanation? 2018-03-13 13:50 GMT-

Re: The Power of Lilypond

Hi again Craig, May I share this link on the Music Engraving Tips Facebook page? Synchronicitously, we are in the middle of a discussion of the pros and cons of Lily+LaTeX versus Dorico et al. Thanks, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmi

Re: The Power of Lilypond

Thank you so much for sharing! It's always a great pleasure to see /really/ good typography (becoming rarer and rarer in modernistic times). Distinct, sophisticated, elegant, unpretentious. And I love the mediaeval figures, yes I do. Very, very good work, indeed (although I'd have omitted the bar

Re: The Power of Lilypond

Kieren MacMillan wrote > Synchronicitously, we are in the middle of a discussion of the pros and > cons of Lily+LaTeX versus Dorico et al. When compared to Sibelius/Finale, Dorico is a huge improvement ("flows", i.e. more than one score in a document...) All this is old hat to LilyPond, of course

Re: The Power of Lilypond

That is a beautiful document. I confess, however, as a former trumpet, French horn, and trombone player, that the discussion about the "serpent" was FASCINATING!! Will now have to go find some recordings. Reminds me of the first time I heard a competent cornetto player play one -- it was magical h

Re: The Power of Lilypond

Am 14.03.2018 um 21:48 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: Hi again Craig, May I share this link on the Music Engraving Tips Facebook page? Synchronicitously, we are in the middle of a discussion of the pros and cons of Lily+LaTeX versus Dorico et al. If you do this I'll probably fire up Facebook aga

Re: The Power of Lilypond

Hi everyone, Thanks for all the positive feedback, but honestly, it's thanks to you all who have always been so willing to help me whenever I've had a problem (especially Urs who has tolerated my stupidity on many occasions!) Kieren, just let me check with the author before you share it. Thanks

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Hi Torsten, This looks really wonderful; terrific work! While we're here, can anyone provide an update on microtonal work in LilyPond? I seem to remember a git project a few years ago but haven't heard anything since. Has anyone done any microtonal or spectralist notation with Lily recently?

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

> Please find attached the proofsheet I'm planning to attach to the > issue tracker (if nothing dreadful happens). There's also a concise > test of \chordmode and note entry. MIDI output isn't contained, but > it's working as it should. > > issue3356-proofsheet.pdf >

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Thanks, Sam, As regards microtonal glyphs, we should probably keep things separate. If you have any suggestions, this list is a good place to discuss them. The user list is even more suited because some things are rather a question of design than a technical thing. Once "the community", or part o

Re: The Power of Lilypond

Hi Craig, Am 14.03.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi all, I thought some of you might like to see this document. It uses Scholarly, Lilyglyphs and lyluatex all in the ONE document. It's a huge leap forward! It has saved heaps of time and avoided the mess of multiple files and havin

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Werner LEMBERG wrote > In this proofsheet the spacing for smaller sizes is not `natural'. > For example, the distance between the clef and the accidentals for > `feta11' is very large. Is this intentional? I think it's a bit > confusing. Hmmm, I was wondering, too. I just used \score inside a cu

Transposing Keyless Brass Parts

Hello, Here are a few measures of the 1st trumpet part in F of the 3rd dance of the Dvorak Slavonic Dances, Op46. The Bb trumpet player would need to transpose up 7 intervals on the fly. There is no key signature. Quite a challenge for amateur players. The concert key starts out in Ab, changes

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Hi, Torsten! On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: > Werner LEMBERG wrote > > In this proofsheet the spacing for smaller sizes is not `natural'. > > For example, the distance between the clef and the accidentals for > > `feta11' is very large. Is this intentional? I think it

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

On 3/14/2018 6:37 PM, Abraham Lee wrote: the counter (the white space inside the flat) almost fills up all the way, not to mention when it's sitting on a staff line If a staff line fills counter white-space... I'm thinking a ledger line would be even worse. -- Karlin High Missouri, USA _

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Hi, Karlin! On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:13 PM Karlin High wrote: > On 3/14/2018 6:37 PM, Abraham Lee wrote: > > the counter (the white space inside the flat) almost fills up all the > > way, not to mention when it's sitting on a staff line > > If a staff line fills counter white-space... I'm thin

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

Am 15. März 2018 05:42:33 MEZ schrieb Abraham Lee : >Hi, Karlin! > >On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:13 PM Karlin High >wrote: > >> On 3/14/2018 6:37 PM, Abraham Lee wrote: >> > the counter (the white space inside the flat) almost fills up all >the >> > way, not to mention when it's sitting on a staff

Re: Transposing Keyless Brass Parts

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Glassmenagerie wrote: > Here are a few measures of the 1st trumpet part in F of the 3rd dance of > the > Dvorak Slavonic Dances, Op46. The Bb trumpet player would need to > transpose > up 7 intervals on the fly. There is no key signature. Quite a challenge > fo