Hi Andrew,
The difference between \RemoveEmptyStaves and \RemoveAllEmptyStaves is that
\RemoveEmptyStaves will not remove empty staves in the first system, the
reason for it being that in orchestral scores it is common to display all
instruments involved in the first system - no matter if they pla
Hi Torsten,
Thanks so much for this supremely clear explanation.
It's quite subtle really, isn't it? A big help. Probably this context does
not come up often for people - my piano scores flutter between, one, two,
three, and four staves in a quite complex manner. Scriabin too, but he does
not go
Here is an alternative approach, putting the g' and f' quavers in the
voice that continues through the parallel music section but adjusting
their appearance to have down stems.
\version "2.19.81"
{
\new Staff {
\time 2/4
\voiceOne 4\( 4 4
<<
{ \voiceTwo g'8 f'8\) }
\n
Dear all,
In case it's useful to anyone, I've just created a template for
typesetting psalms with Anglican chant using LilyPond, LaTeX and GNU
Make.
https://github.com/gregrs-uk/anglican-chant-template
Best wishes,
Greg
--
Twitter: @gregrs_uk
PGP key ID: 64907C8A
Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD
Hi Greg,
> In case it's useful to anyone, I've just created a template for typesetting
> psalms with Anglican chant using LilyPond, LaTeX and GNU Make.
Lovely work! Haven't looked at the code yet, but the output is fabulous —
looking forward to diving under the hood, if I can find the time.
As
Hi David, thank you for your suggestions, this is almost done!
I decided to pass an alist to the function instead of changing the amount
of arguments based on the procedure name, mainly because if I write more
angle functions in the future I want to be able to do so without having to
temper with t
On 10.02.2018 15:09, Gregrs wrote:
Dear all,
In case it's useful to anyone, I've just created a template for
typesetting psalms with Anglican chant using LilyPond, LaTeX and GNU Make.
Looks nice, thanks for sharing!
Did you consider using Urs’ lilyglyphs package for the dynamics? Of
course t
Hi Stefano,
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Stefano Troncaro
wrote:
> Hi David, thank you for your suggestions, this is almost done!
>
> I decided to pass an alist to the function instead of changing the amount of
> arguments based on the procedure name, mainly because if I write more angle
> f
Hello,
I make organ harmonisations for the psalms.
It is customary in dutch to not use a time indication for psalms, but tactus
minor, tactus major, etc.
I personally do this by using the \time command (e.g. 10/2) for each line and
override the timesignature. This looks quite clear.
Yet it can
Gert Koetsier writes:
> Hello,
> I make organ harmonisations for the psalms.
> It is customary in dutch to not use a time indication for psalms, but
> tactus minor, tactus major, etc.
> I personally do this by using the \time command (e.g. 10/2) for each
> line and override the timesignature. Thi
Hi Gert,
You can set the \accidentalStyle to "forget":
~~+
\version "2.18.2"
\relative { \accidentalStyle forget bes'4 bes bes bes }
Does this solve your problem?
Groeten,
Torsten
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
_
Hi Gert,
maybe you’d like to use
\cadenzaOn
\set Score.barAlways = ##t
\set Score.defaultBarType = #""
That way, time will stop being measured, and line breaks be allowed
between every two notes. Use \bar "|" where you want. And while “cadenza
mode” is active, all accidentals will be marked a
Yes. I'm in Frescobaldi!
:-)
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Harm,
Does the snippet below show expected behaviour from your custom \dynamic
function?
I would have expected the \omit to affect both "dynamic texts"…
Thanks,
Kieren.
SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19.64"
#(use-modules (ice-9 regex))
#(define (note-column::main-extent grob)
"Return ext
2018-02-11 0:30 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Harm,
>
> Does the snippet below show expected behaviour from your custom \dynamic
> function?
> I would have expected the \omit to affect both "dynamic texts"…
>
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
>
> SNIPPET BEGINS
[...]
Hi Kieren,
in a nutshell the cod
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the quick response.
> DynamicText is caused, but you can't nuke the stencil via
> \omit (which would be stencil-override).
Ah.
> But you could do it later.
> Applying
> \override DynamicText.after-line-breaking =
> #(lambda (grob) (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'stencil '())
2018-02-11 2:08 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
>> DynamicText is caused, but you can't nuke the stencil via
>> \omit (which would be stencil-override).
>
> Ah.
>
>> But you could do it later.
>> Applying
>> \override DynamicText.after-line-breaking =
2018-02-11 2:36 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2018-02-11 2:08 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan :
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response.
>>
>>> DynamicText is caused, but you can't nuke the stencil via
>>> \omit (which would be stencil-override).
>>
>> Ah.
>>
>>> But you could do it later.
>>> A
Hi Thomas,
This seems to work:
\override DynamicText.after-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob) (ly:grob-suicide! grob))
But this is the Scheme equivalent of me shooting a machine gun with a blindfold
on, so please tell me if I've done something wrong.
Thanks,
Kieren.
> On Feb 10,
Some time ago I asked about how to extend a pedal line so that the off
event goes at the end of the note duration, for use usually at at the end
of a bar. Various people suggested that having a to-barline option would
make sense, similar to hairpins.
Can I propose that as an enhancement, assuming
This link
http://lilypond.org/sponsoring.html
describes paying developers to implement specific features. Is this the only
way to contribute to Lilypond financially, or is it possible to make a general
donation, ideally a small recurring monthly donation, to Lilypond and/or
openlilylib?
Thank
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Mason Hock wrote:
> is it possible to make a general donation, ideally a small recurring monthly
> donation, to Lilypond and/or openlilylib?
I understand David Kastrup is the only full-time community-supported
developer. d...@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/archiv
Hi!
As you might have noticed from previous mails I have sent, I'm working
on a project to process works from Bach on lilypond.
I have already put up BWV 1013 and 1030 (I dare you to guess the
instrument that I play). However, each one of them has many different
editions. Right now I have set up
23 matches
Mail list logo
