Thank you very much, problem solved! Sorry for the missing lines, I was
not aware how to shorten the voices and text so much.
Werner
Am Dienstag, den 08.08.2017, 08:48 +0200 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> Please always give a *compilable* minimal example. I had to add the
> following code to be able to t
Hello list!
I wanted to write a little callback to remove all occurrencies
of "0" fingerings. This is what I got so far:
\version "2.19.63"
music = {
c'4-3 d'-0 e'-2 f'-3 | g'1-0
}
\score {
\new Staff \with {
\override Fingering.stencil =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((text (l
Am 08.08.2017 um 10:23 schrieb Marc Hohl:
I wanted to write a little callback to remove all occurrencies
of "0" fingerings.
This doesn’t empty the stencil but removes the Fingering grobs
completely (by suicide):
\override Fingering.before-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
(if
Hi Malte,
Am 08.08.2017 um 10:30 schrieb Malte Meyn:
Am 08.08.2017 um 10:23 schrieb Marc Hohl:
I wanted to write a little callback to remove all occurrencies
of "0" fingerings.
This doesn’t empty the stencil but removes the Fingering grobs
completely (by suicide):
thanks for this soluti
What about
\relative b, {
\key g \major
\clef "bass"
\time 3/4
\textLengthOn
d4 _\markup{\italic "Fine"}
\fermata
g4- \markup { \dynamic "f" }
b4
}
2017-08-07 15:18 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
> It does, but only if you attach the markup to the note. As it turns out,
> it still _just_ coll
2017-08-08 11:46 GMT+02:00 Marc Hohl :
> Hi Malte,
>
> Am 08.08.2017 um 10:30 schrieb Malte Meyn:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 08.08.2017 um 10:23 schrieb Marc Hohl:
>>>
>>>
>>> I wanted to write a little callback to remove all occurrencies
>>> of "0" fingerings.
>>
>>
>> This doesn’t empty the stencil but remov
Marc Hohl writes:
> I wanted to write a little callback to remove all occurrencies
> of "0" fingerings. This is what I got so far:
>
>
> \version "2.19.63"
>
> music = {
> c'4-3 d'-0 e'-2 f'-3 | g'1-0
> }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff \with {
> \override Fingering.stencil =
^^
2017-08-08 12:47 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
> You can do this by using
[...]
Nice one. I always forget about 'grob-transformer'. Missing bracket, tho'
\score {
\new Staff \with {
\override Fingering.text =
#(grob-transformer 'text
(lambda (grob default)
(if (string= "0" d
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2017-08-08 12:47 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
>>
>> You can do this by using
> [...]
>
> Nice one. I always forget about 'grob-transformer'. Missing bracket, tho'
Edited out a debug printer before posting (which is why I figured the
warning to be bogus), obviously without
Am 08.08.2017 um 12:47 schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
I wanted to write a little callback to remove all occurrencies
of "0" fingerings. This is what I got so far:
\version "2.19.63"
music = {
c'4-3 d'-0 e'-2 f'-3 | g'1-0
}
\score {
\new Staff \with {
\override Fingerin
Am 08.08.2017 um 13:00 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2017-08-08 12:47 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
You can do this by using
[...]
Nice one. I always forget about 'grob-transformer'. Missing bracket, tho'
I wasn't aware of grob-transformer at all. And I am still unsure about
what it does. I have rea
Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 08.08.2017 um 13:00 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> 2017-08-08 12:47 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>>
>>>
>>> You can do this by using
>> [...]
>>
>> Nice one. I always forget about 'grob-transformer'. Missing bracket, tho'
>
> I wasn't aware of grob-transformer at all. And I am stil
Hello Manuela,
+2, thanks, using two markups is both elegant and simple!
JM
> Le 8 août 2017 à 12:18, Manuela Gößnitzer a
> écrit :
>
> What about
>
> \relative b, {
> \key g \major
> \clef "bass"
> \time 3/4
>
> \textLengthOn
> d4 _\markup{\italic "Fine"}
> \fermata
> g4- \markup {
Thanks, that worked. Had to change the horizontal alignment but now I have
exactly what I was looking for.
On 6 August 2017 at 00:46, Martin Neubauer wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/2017 00:19, Gregor Smith wrote:
> > \version "2.16.0"
> >
> > \include "common.ly"
> >
> > upper = \relative c'' {
> > \cl
All,
I ask this question knowing some of Lilypond's developers frequent this
list -- is there anyway to get better error reporting/logging? I ask for
several reasons.
One is that the current log output when -verbose is enabled is FULL of
lines relating to font substitution. Over 80% of the output
Guy Stalnaker writes:
> Third, some log output lines do not reference a line in the lilypond source
> file. Again, in this case, the eventual resolution related to multi-measure
> rests (that closing brace } "covered" the multi-measure rest because it was
> after and not before the multi-measure
As I finish up a sight-singing course packet, I'm wondering if it's
possible for LilyPond to automatically number the individual scores from
beginning to end.
Throughout the document, I have six different types of score contexts,
shown in mwe.ly.
The perfect solution would be a fix where LilyPond
> From: Guy Stalnaker
> Subject: Error reporting and Lilypond Linting
> I ask this question knowing some of Lilypond's developers frequent this
list -- is there anyway to get better error reporting/logging?
Sorry, I can't speak to your main question.
> So, though multi-measure rest errors were
Do you mean something like this?
#(define score-number 0) %% insert in first score
#(set! score-number (1+ score-number))
\new PianoStaff \with {
instrumentName = \markup {
#(number->string score-number) "."
}
}
\relative c'' { c }
2017-08-08 23:33 GMT+02:00 Sam Bivens :
> As I fin
19 matches
Mail list logo
