David Kastrup writes:
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2016-07-03 0:19 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>>>
>>> Two possible ways to fix this:
>>>
>>> 1) add the Output_property_engraver on all possibly interesting
>>> Bottom(?) contexts
>>> 2) Move the Output_property_engraver to Score level only and chan
Dear all,
As shown in the WME, in the figured bass line the figures with accidentals are
"top-aligned", which I find rather unworthy of LilyPond.
See screenshot:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qff6p6t2i6j6ei7/Screenshot%202016-07-03%2009.51.40.png?dl=0
MWE:
%- - - - - - - - - - -
\version "2.18.2"
Hi Robert,
I am not an expert in FB in lilypond, but this appears to be fixed in
2.19.44 at least. Can you upgrade?
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 3 Jul 2016, at 10:34 , Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I am not an expert in FB in lilypond, but this appears to be fixed in 2.19.44
> at least. Can you upgrade?
>
> Andrew
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Yes, I have installed 2.19.44-1. I had already tested the MWE with 2
Robert Blackstone writes:
> On 3 Jul 2016, at 10:34 , Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> I am not an expert in FB in lilypond, but this appears to be fixed
>> in 2.19.44 at least. Can you upgrade?
>>
>> Andrew
>
> Hi Andrew,
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> Yes, I have installed 2.1
If I make the script font size small enough to be what I want, the marks go
inside the staff, which is not desired. If I place them outside the staff
the only way I know how using outside-staff-priority, when using padding to
align them, only the accents move, not the other script marks. This is
ea
Hi Robert,
Your code needs to be modified.
Andrew
== snip
\version "2.19.44"
lower = \relative c' {
\clef bass
\key f \major
\time 4/4
bes4 a g c | %low-1
}
FiguredBass = \figuremode {
< 5 3 >4 < 5 3- > < 5 3! > < 5 3+ >| %BC-1
}
\score {
<<
\new Staff = "lower" \lower
On 3 Jul 2016, at 11:54 , David Kastrup wrote:
> Robert Blackstone writes:
>
>> On 3 Jul 2016, at 10:34 , Andrew Bernard wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>> I am not an expert in FB in lilypond, but this appears to be fixed
>>> in 2.19.44 at least. Can you upgrade?
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>
>> Yes,
Robert Blackstone writes:
> On 3 Jul 2016, at 11:54 , David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Robert Blackstone writes:
>>
>>> On 3 Jul 2016, at 10:34 , Andrew Bernard wrote:
>>>
Hi Robert,
I am not an expert in FB in lilypond, but this appears to be fixed
in 2.19.44 at least. Can you
I have the impression I'm missing something stupid, but I'm unable to
figure out (pun intended) how to print something like
7
#
instead of
7
#3
in figuremode.
How can I achieve that?
TIA
Urs
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Le dimanche 03 juillet 2016 à 12:46 +0200, Urs Liska a écrit :
> I have the impression I'm missing something stupid, but I'm unable to
> figure out (pun intended) how to print something like
>
> 7
> #
>
> instead of
>
> 7
> #3
>
> in figuremode.
>
> How can I achieve that?
>
> TIA
> Urs
>
Urs Liska writes:
> I have the impression I'm missing something stupid, but I'm unable to
> figure out (pun intended) how to print something like
>
> 7
> #
>
> instead of
>
> 7
> #3
>
> in figuremode.
>
> How can I achieve that?
Anything wrong with \figures { < 7 _+ > } here?
--
David Kastr
Am 03.07.2016 um 12:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> I have the impression I'm missing something stupid, but I'm unable to
>> figure out (pun intended) how to print something like
>>
>> 7
>> #
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> 7
>> #3
>>
>> in figuremode.
>>
>> How can I achieve that?
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 03.07.2016 um 12:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> I have the impression I'm missing something stupid, but I'm unable to
>>> figure out (pun intended) how to print something like
>>>
>>> 7
>>> #
>>>
>>> instead of
>>>
>>> 7
>>> #3
>>>
>>> in figuremo
Am 03.07.2016 um 13:27 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 03.07.2016 um 12:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Urs Liska writes:
>>>
I have the impression I'm missing something stupid, but I'm unable to
figure out (pun intended) how to print something like
7
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 03.07.2016 um 13:27 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 03.07.2016 um 12:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
> I have the impression I'm missing something stupid, but I'm unable to
> figure out (pun intended) how to print somet
Am 03.07.2016 um 13:44 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> Vertical spaces and brackets can be included in figures:
>> >
>> > \figures {
>> ><[12 _!] 8 [6 4]>
>> > }
>> > [image src="lilypond/3a/lily-426e6f45.png" alt="[image of music]"
>> > text="image of music"]
>> >
> OK, but
On 03.07.2016 03:34, Jeffery Shivers wrote:
I'd appreciate any thoughts on the following syntax for implementing
footnotes with annotations:
\criticalRemark \with {
message = "my annotation"
} #'(1 . 2) "my footnote" Slur a4_\the-footnote-hook ( ...
vs.
\criticalRemark \with {
message
Am 03.07.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 03.07.2016 03:34, Jeffery Shivers wrote:
>> I'd appreciate any thoughts on the following syntax for implementing
>> footnotes with annotations:
>>
>> \criticalRemark \with {
>> message = "my annotation"
>> } #'(1 . 2) "my footnote" Slur a4_\
> On 3 Jul 2016, at 14:56, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> Recently I posted a query about putting a slash (as per grace notes) on the
> right hand side of a beamed group, posting the code I have which does a very
> fine job of this for the left hand side.
>
> Having received no response, does no-o
While constructing books using Scheme functions, I found some behaviour
I did not expect.
The scores are written out in the reverse order from the order of the
arguments. Easily fixed by applying the reverse function to the list of
scores. Is there a reason for this choice of ordering?
The s
Timothy Lanfear writes:
> While constructing books using Scheme functions, I found some
> behaviour I did not expect.
>
> The scores are written out in the reverse order from the order of the
> arguments. Easily fixed by applying the reverse function to the list
> of scores. Is there a reason for
Hi Hans,
No, it’s a slash to indicate the group of notes are grace notes. Feathered
beams indicate tempo chnage.
Andrew
On 4 July 2016 at 2:04:55 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
Isn’t it a variation of feathered beams?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-
23 matches
Mail list logo
