Hi list,
the tie from the f' in the following code goes too far right as if the
f' wasn’t shifted because of the g' (see attachment). Is this a bug? Any
ideas for a workaround?
%%%
\version "2.19.40" % 2.18.2 and earlier
\language "deutsch"
\relative {
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
\
Hi all,
preparing a course I'm going to give in June and July turned into a
substantial task: I'm ending up writing the book that *I* would have
needed some years ago. Basically what I'm trying to do is give readers a
chance to properly understand how Scheme can basically be used in
LilyPond. It's
Am 02.05.2016 um 10:20 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> Hi list,
>
> the tie from the f' in the following code goes too far right as if the
> f' wasn’t shifted because of the g' (see attachment). Is this a bug?
I would say it is a bug, the tie should know where its ending note is.
> Any ideas for a workar
Hi Urs,
Oh my goodness, yes… I am the perfect candidate for this, I think. =)
Please send/link.
Thanks,
Kieren.
On May 2, 2016, at 5:27 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> preparing a course I'm going to give in June and July turned into a
> substantial task: I'm ending up writing the book t
Hello Kieren,
I’ve been looking forward to reading such a book so yes, I’m interested in
proof-reading it!
JM
> Le 2 mai 2016 à 15:32, Kieren MacMillan a
> écrit :
>
> Hi Urs,
>
> Oh my goodness, yes… I am the perfect candidate for this, I think. =)
>
> Please send/link.
>
> Thanks,
> Ki
I'm very much interested.
g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Scheme-book-p-review-tp190300p190307.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hey Urs,
I'm willing to review the book. I'm a programmer with very good scheme/lisp
knowledge and I've been using lilypond for a number of years. I've written
some lilypond scheme functions but not that much. Let me know if I can be
of help.
Cheers,
Immanuel
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Urs L
On Sat 30 Apr 2016 at 09:22:14 (+0200), Noeck wrote:
> Am 30.04.2016 um 05:43 schrieb David Wright:
> > it would be great
> > if it could convert into a canonical style, where canonical could be
> > defined in ways such as: every note with pitch&duration; duration (or
> > even pitch) on only the fi
On Sat 30 Apr 2016 at 10:38:55 (+0200), Malte Meyn wrote:
> Am 30.04.2016 um 05:43 schrieb David Wright:
> >But it's no surprise that composing directly into LP is only really
> >possible in absolute mode.
>
> It’s not. I’ve always done it in \relative mode using octave checks,
> I never had any p
2016-05-02 10:20 GMT+02:00 Malte Meyn :
> Hi list,
>
> the tie from the f' in the following code goes too far right as if the f'
> wasn’t shifted because of the g' (see attachment). Is this a bug? Any ideas
> for a workaround?
>
> %%%
> \version "2.19.40" % 2.18.2 and earlier
> \language "d
Op Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:45:41 +0600
Henning Hraban Ramm schreef:
> I started working on the German translation (see attached), but can
> proceed only next week. In case someone else is working on that,
> please let me know - we can at least proofread each other.
Thanks!
> Did you consider using
On Thu 28 Apr 2016 at 13:56:03 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> On 27/04/2016 01:04, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >On 4/26/16 3:56 PM, "Thomas Morley" wrote:
> >
> >>2016-04-26 2:21 GMT+02:00 Wols Lists :
> >>>On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote:
> (I still don't know what you're trying to accompl
> > But I could not get it to move down onto the staff. As described in
> >
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/formatting-text#text-alignment
> > "Vertical alignment is a bit more complex. As stated above, markup
objects
> > can be moved as a whole; however, it is also possib
On Tue 26 Apr 2016 at 01:21:00 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote:
> > But I see you've now acknowledged (indirectly) that LP can set
> > multiple marks at the same point after stating that it can't.
> > Are there other things that LP can be persuaded to do itself th
On 3 May 2016 at 04:53, David Wright wrote:
> Perhaps composers don't sweat over individual notes like that and/or
> don't need a decent looking copy in front of them. Some compose at the
> piano, don't they.
When I’m composing, I don’t want to have to deal with anything more
technologically adva
Hi everyone,
In the attached MWE, I'm somehow having trouble getting the initial
`^\markup a` to be placed /above/ the horizontal bracket, even though
all future instances of this markup are placed above the bracket no
problem. It seems so simple; I feel a little silly just asking. The
commen
16 matches
Mail list logo
