I have a couple of questions about key signatures:
1) When a key change occurs at the end of a printed line, the new key
signature is printed at the end of the line. Is there any way to
suppress that?
2) When the key changes, the new key signature includes a bunch of
naturals to negate the
On 05.10.2015 08:30, Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
Am 05.10.2015 08:27, schrieb msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
> Does anyone know if it would be possible to make the links in the
regular
> PDF reader go to Frescobaldi?
What is a regular PDF reader? Is it a worki
Hi T.M.,
Check the Notation Reference, section 5.4.6 - you'll find the answers to your
questions there.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/visibility-of-objects
Best, Robert
__
Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.
-- Flannery O'Connor
> On 5 O
Actually, so save you some time finding the relevant passages, your question 1
is answered in the section called "Using break-visibility", and Q2 in section
"Visibility of cancelling accidentals".
Best, Robert
__
Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.
-- Flannery O
Hi Marten,
On 05.10.2015 03:09, Marten wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to left offset a dotted note in a CueVoice, but although the
note is shifted left as expected, the dot is not moved left.
How can I make the dot go left as well?
I’d have liked to suggest
%%%
\version "2.18.2"
m
I'm not sure if this what you're looking for, but here goes: I'm using
frescobaldi on a Mac, and of course it does have a panel where you see the
engraved score. Frescobaldi does not, however support printing the pdf itself -
instead it asks if I'd like to open the pdf in the default pdf viewer
Am 05.10.2015 um 09:50 schrieb Robert Schmaus:
> I'm not sure if this what you're looking for, but here goes: I'm using
> frescobaldi on a Mac, and of course it does have a panel where you see
> the engraved score. Frescobaldi does not, however support printing the
> pdf itself - instead it asks
Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 9:54, Urs Liska ha
scritto:
I think what he wants is the following:
- view the PDF in Acrobat Reader (for its better resolution or
whatever reason,
I think he knows how to do that (as it's where he's coming from)
- Click on the note in Acrobat Reader and have Fr
On 10/5/2015 3:33 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
On 5 Oct 2015, at 09:16, T. Michael Sommers mailto:tmsomme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have a couple of questions about key signatures:
1) When a key change occurs at the end of a printed line, the new key
signature is printed at the end of the line. Is
On 10/5/2015 3:42 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
Actually, so save you some time finding the relevant passages, your
... Q2 in section "Visibility of cancelling accidentals".
Thanks. I hadn't seen that while searching the manual.
--
T.M. Sommers -- tmsomme...@gmail.com -- ab2sb
__
Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 10:57, Federico Bruni
ha scritto:
Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 9:54, Urs Liska ha
scritto:
I think what he wants is the following:
- view the PDF in Acrobat Reader (for its better resolution or
whatever reason,
I think he knows how to do that (as it's where h
Am 05.10.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 10:57, Federico Bruni
> ha scritto:
>> Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 9:54, Urs Liska ha
>> scritto:
>>> I think what he wants is the following:
>>> - view the PDF in Acrobat Reader (for its better resolution or
>>> w
>
> I tried this:
>
> \override Staff.KeySignature.break-visibility = ##(#f #t #t)
>
> along with some variations, but it didn't seem to have any effect. Also, I
> had used that formula in another situation (with the TimeSignature, I think),
> and, although it removed the signature, it left
On 10/5/2015 5:13 AM, T. Michael Sommers wrote:
On 10/5/2015 3:42 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
Actually, so save you some time finding the relevant passages, your
... Q2 in section "Visibility of cancelling accidentals".
Thanks. I hadn't seen that while searching the manual.
Hmmm. When I chan
I am sorry, I was confusing this thread "PDF Links in Windows" with
another one: "2.18.2 - Thoughts so far".
But to add to the first thread I reread: It is starting with a posting
on 27th September 2015 of Thomas WillNot added a link to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/Documentation/user/lilypond/
I forgot to add the link of Harm/Thomas Morley
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/point-and-click
Obviously does not describe a Windows solution either ...
On 05.10.2015 11:36, BB wrote:
I am sorry, I was confusing this thread "PDF Links in Windows" with
another one: "2.18.
Am 05.10.2015 um 11:36 schrieb BB:
> I am sorry, I was confusing this thread "PDF Links in Windows" with
> another one: "2.18.2 - Thoughts so far".
>
> But to add to the first thread I reread: It is starting with a posting
> on 27th September 2015 of Thomas WillNot added a link to
> http://lilypo
Hello,
On 05/10/15 10:23, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Am 05.10.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Federico Bruni:
>> Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 10:57, Federico Bruni
>> ha scritto:
>>> Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 9:54, Urs Liska ha
>>> scritto:
I think what he wants is the following:
- view the PDF i
Hi all,
I'm a complete newbie here, so please bare with me ;-)
I already spent a couple of hours, reading all manuals and mailing lists,
trying to engrave something as simple as this:
Notice: the "full-measure rests" are not shown in the screenshot (beginner
piano book), but I want to engr
Am 05.10.2015 um 12:42 schrieb James:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/10/15 10:23, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Am 05.10.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Federico Bruni:
>>> Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 10:57, Federico Bruni
>>> ha scritto:
Il giorno lun 5 ott 2015 alle 9:54, Urs Liska ha
scritto:
> I think what
jurgen.lams...@telenet.be writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a complete newbie here, so please bare with me ;-)
>
> I already spent a couple of hours, reading all manuals and mailing
> lists, trying to engrave something as simple as this:
>
> *
>
> Notice: the "full-measure rests" are not shown in the scre
Hi Jurgen,
welcome to this list and LilyPond!
I will answer some of your questions but you'll surely get other
responses as well.
Am 05.10.2015 um 12:46 schrieb jurgen.lams...@telenet.be:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a complete newbie here, so please bare with me ;-)
>
> I already spent a couple of hours,
On 10/5/2015 5:33 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
I tried this:
\override Staff.KeySignature.break-visibility = ##(#f #t #t)
along with some variations, but it didn't seem to have any effect.
Also, I had used that formula in another situation (with the
TimeSignature, I think), and, although it remov
Am 2015-10-05 um 16:42 schrieb James :
>>> "Custom protocol handlers aren't supported by Adobe Reader X and later
>>> for security reasons."
>>> https://forums.adobe.com/message/5593888#5593888
>> Is this definitive?
>>
>> Then this should be added to the documentation somewhere (CCing to
>> bug-
Am 05.10.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
> On OSX, my old Acrobat Pro 9 as well as Adobe Reader 11 try to open
> LilyPond’s "textedit://" links with LilyPad, after asking if they may or
> should block such attempts. So the "security reasons" seem to apply only on
> Windows (I don’t
Ok, this should do it.
The intention is to provide extra functionality to text spanners. By using
this code, you have all the functionality of normal text spanners, but you
are able to have multiple spanners per voice.
You simply need to swap the regular engraver for this one in a layout
block,
On 05.10.2015 11:23, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 05.10.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Federico Bruni:
>> ...
"Custom protocol handlers aren't supported by Adobe Reader X and later
for security reasons."
https://forums.adobe.com/message/5593888#5593888
Is this definitive?
My last _abandoned_ attempt at gett
Hello folks,
I’d like to obtain the following from Poulenc, in which the fermata is
in-between a2 and r4:
I tried with:
\version "2.19.28"
\score {
\relative c'' {
\key f \major \time 2/2 | % 147
<<
{a2 r4}
{s2 s16 \fermata s8.}
>>
e16 -\markup{\dynamic "ff" \i
Hi
Use something like:
<<
{a2 r4}
{s4 s16 \fermata s8.}
>>
Regards,
Jean
Le lundi 05 octobre 2015 à 17:25 +0200, Menu Jacques a écrit :
> Hello folks,
>
> I’d like to obtain the following from Poulenc, in which the fermata
> is in-between a2 and r4:
>
>
>
> I tried with:
- Original Message -
From: "Jean Brefort"
To: "Menu Jacques" ; "Lilypond-user Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Offset fermata problem
Hi
Use something like:
<<
{a2 r4}
{s4 s16 \fermata s8.}
>>
Regards,
Jean
Le lundi 05 octobre 2015 à 17:25 +0200, M
Hi Michael,
Am 05.10.2015 um 11:33 schrieb T. Michael Sommers:
> Hmmm. When I change from a key with sharps or flats in it to one with
> no sharps or flats, the cancelling accidentals still appear. I can
> understand that, since otherwise there would be no indication that the
> key had changed,
My question may need some clarification. Especially the third example,
which should look something like this:
[image: Inline afbeelding 1]
\relative c''{
<<{2. r4}\\{4 a8 c}>>
}
The tie starting at the b on the third beat in the second voice looks a
little awkward. It may be theoretically
Hi Jacques,
How about:
\version "2.19.28"
\score {
\relative c'' {
\key f \major \time 2/2 | % 147
\set Score.proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1/1)
<<
{ a2 r4 }
{ s4 s16 s8.\fermata s4 } %% <= e.g.
>>
\unset Score.proportionalNotationDuration
For a while I have been thinking about something which I feel could be a
useful modification of Lilypond's behaviour.
Lilypond defaults to standard choices for musical notation, which
generally saves a lot of work - for instance, it assumes that when we
write c4 we want a standard crotchet to appe
Simon Albrecht mail.de> writes:
>
> Hi Marten,
>
> On 05.10.2015 03:09, Marten wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to left offset a dotted note in a CueVoice, but although
the
> > note is shifted left as expected, the dot is not moved left.
> > How can I make the dot go left as well?
>
> I’d ha
Hello Jean, Phil and Pierre,
Thanks for you help!
As the secondary voice doesn’t need to fill 3 quarter notes, I find that:
\score {
\relative c'' {
\key f \major \time 2/2 | % 147
<<
{a2 r4}
{s4*5/4 s16 \fermata}
>>
e16 -\markup{\dynamic "ff" \italic "librement"}
Hello Jacques,
On 05.10.2015 17:25, Menu Jacques wrote:
Hello folks,
I’d like to obtain the following from Poulenc, in which the fermata is
in-between a2 and r4:
based on an idea by David Kastrup I wrote a music function, which
provides a nice interface for this kind of things:
%%%
Hello David,
On 05.10.2015 19:49, David Sumbler wrote:
Even when we write the opposite, Lilypond still conforms to the standard
practice - which is very nice of it, but unnecessary. Lilypond is a
practical tool, not an educational one, and people using it know the
conventions
I don’t and I’m
On 05.10.2015 19:00, S wrote:
My question may need some clarification. Especially the third example,
which should look something like this:
Inline afbeelding 1
\relative c''{
<<{2. r4}\\{4 a8 c}>>
}
The tie starting at the b on the third beat in the second voice looks
a little awkwa
On 05.10.2015 11:33, T. Michael Sommers wrote:
Hmmm. When I change from a key with sharps or flats in it to one with
no sharps or flats, the cancelling accidentals still appear. I can
understand that, since otherwise there would be no indication that the
key had changed, but for my application
On 05.10.2015 13:33, Urs Liska wrote:
Remove the slurs in the first two measures completely
Hear, hear! The musicologist deviates from the original notation :-) You
definitely need to make an editorial remark…
Cheek aside, I think they are phrasing slurs and make sense as such.
Yours, Simon
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Albrecht"
To: "Urs Liska" ;
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: How write cross-staff slur (in combination with lyrics)
On 05.10.2015 13:33, Urs Liska wrote:
> Remove the slurs in the first two measures completely
Hear, hear! The mu
Hello Jurgen,
On 05.10.2015 12:46, jurgen.lams...@telenet.be wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a complete newbie here, so please bear with me ;-)
I already spent a couple of hours, reading all manuals and mailing lists,
Reading the manuals is always helpful, but at the beginning it’s a huge
heap – and aft
Am 05.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 05.10.2015 13:33, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Remove the slurs in the first two measures completely
>
> Hear, hear! The musicologist deviates from the original notation :-)
> You definitely need to make an editorial
Depends on the type of publication o
On 05.10.2015 22:01, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 05.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
On 05.10.2015 13:33, Urs Liska wrote:
Remove the slurs in the first two measures completely
Hear, hear! The musicologist deviates from the original notation :-)
You definitely need to make an editorial
Depen
Am 05.10.2015 um 22:20 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 05.10.2015 22:01, Urs Liska wrote:
>>
>> Am 05.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
>>> On 05.10.2015 13:33, Urs Liska wrote:
Remove the slurs in the first two measures completely
>>> Hear, hear! The musicologist deviates from the origi
One small amendment: The spacing is less grotesque if you insert
%%%
selfAl = #(define-music-function (parser location num) (number?)
#{ \once \override LyricText . self-alignment-X = $num #})
text = \lyricmode {
Rid -- ing, | rid -- ing, | \selfAl #.5 ’round \selfAl #-.5 and a
>
> { \key as \minor ces \key c \major c }
>
> How on earth would the performer know that the second one is a c natural if
> there is no key cancellation?
S/He wouldn't. Unless (and I quote)
> My application is not an actual score to be played by others, but just a
> cheat sheet for me,
Be
2015-10-05 19:49 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler :
> For a while I have been thinking about something which I feel could be a
> useful modification of Lilypond's behaviour.
>
> Lilypond defaults to standard choices for musical notation, which
> generally saves a lot of work - for instance, it assumes that
Hello Simon,
Thanks a lot to DK and yourself, this « after » function is awesome!
JM
> Le 5 oct. 2015 à 20:38, Simon Albrecht a écrit :
>
> Hello Jacques,
>
> On 05.10.2015 17:25, Menu Jacques wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I’d like to obtain the following from Poulenc, in which the fermata is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/15 03:40, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 15-10-04 06:29 PM, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Karen S. Billings
>> wrote:
>>> I'm a former Bell Labs engineer, where I used Unix (vi, awk,
>>> shell, etc.) everyday. I got s
The discussion of MIDI in the manual refers to "volume" throughout. It
appears that at least some of the time, that actually means MIDI velocity,
which is not the same thing. For instance, dynamic marks like \f and \pp
seem to set the velocity. Do *all* references to "volume" really mean
velocit
Quoting Simon Albrecht (simon.albre...@mail.de):
> One small amendment: The spacing is less grotesque if you insert
> %%%
> selfAl = #(define-music-function (parser location num) (number?)
> #{ \once \override LyricText . self-alignment-X = $num #})
>
> text = \lyricmode {
> Rid
53 matches
Mail list logo
