Breaking news: kerning on Windows does work now!

I want to say big 'Thank You' to Masamichi Hosoda, who managed to fix this nasty bug! Issues 2656 and 2657 can be marked as 'Fixed' now :) - Karol ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-us

Re: Displaying a staff despite \removeEmptyStaves

On 06/04/2015 00:23, Urs Liska wrote: I don't know enough about your setup, but if you'd write \hide MultiMeasureRest it should make the rests invisible but still act as rests. Maybe this helps? Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.

Score Layout, several questions

Good morning, I've been tasked with preparing the score of what will be a critical edition of some liturgical works of a lesser-known 18th-century composer. Because of the nature of the source (the composer was writing at a monastery), the originals are engraved using single-press typesetting (ie,

Re: Displaying a staff despite \removeEmptyStaves

Am 06.04.2015 um 09:59 schrieb Anton Curl: On 06/04/2015 00:23, Urs Liska wrote: I don't know enough about your setup, but if you'd write \hide MultiMeasureRest it should make the rests invisible but still act as rests. Maybe this helps? Urs ___ l

Re: Displaying a staff despite \removeEmptyStaves

On 06/04/2015 11:48, Simon Albrecht wrote: Yes: \undo\hide MultiMeasureRest. Yours, Simon Very well. Thanks to all of you! Anton Curl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Score Layout, several questions

Re beaming positions control: An example snippet: \version "2.19.17" treble = \relative c'' {   \once \override Beam.positions = #'(-3 . -3)   c8 e g a   \once \override Beam.positions = #'(3 . 3)   c, g e c } \score {   \new Staff { \treble } } You seem to have jumped in the deep end! Welcome

Re: Score Layout, several questions

Thanks for the snippet. Do you know of any way to set that *generally*? At the least, a way to set the difference between the first and last Beam.positions values to be less than some maximum? I'm unsure what you mean by "trying to engrave the gaps in the staff lines between the type sorts". Also

Custom glyph articulation [WAS: Creating new articulation (adding to an internal alist) ]

Hi All, I've followed this conversation with a lot of interest: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Creating-new-articulation-adding-to-an-internal-alist-td172689.html However, there's something I'm missing. I'm trying to put my own glyph into a new articulation script without success: I still

Re: Score Layout, several questions

Where you refer to: "the originals are engraved using single-press typesetting (ie, each note is its own block, so staff-lines and whatnot aren't continuous), so it's an interesting exercise in historical scores.” Andrew On 6 April 2015 at 22:44:15, N. Andrew Walsh (n.andrew.wa...@gmail.com)

Re: Score Layout, several questions

At 14:43 on 06 Apr 2015, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: >Thanks for the snippet. Do you know of any way to set that >*generally*? At the least, a way to set the difference between the >first and last Beam.positions values to be less than some maximum? Try experimenting with different values of Beam.dampin

Re: Score Layout, several questions

Perhaps something like the attached image? FWIW when I set these, under _no circumstances_ do I try to replicate the non-continuous staff lines. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Andrew Bernard To: N. Andrew Walsh Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, April 06,

Re: Custom glyph articulation [WAS: Creating new articulation (adding to an internal alist) ]

I don't know this out of my hat. But you may look into my file in openlilylib. It's ly/stylesheets /fonts/arnold-extensions.ily (I think). Good luck Urs Am 6. April 2015 15:12:49 MESZ, schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider : >Hi All, > >I've followed this conversation with a lot of interest: >http://l

Re: Score Layout, several questions

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: > Perhaps something like the attached image? FWIW when I set these, under > _no circumstances_ do I try to replicate the non-continuous staff lines. > > -- > Phil Holmes > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Andrew Bernard > *To:* N.

Re: Custom glyph articulation [WAS: Creating new articulation (adding to an internal alist) ]

Hi Urs, Tanks for the tip but I'm afraid not. Actually it says: "Some extensions that have been made possible through extra glyphs in the Arnold font." What I'd like is to avoid using any of the existing or extra glyph, just a custom path drawing. Cheers, Pierre 2015-04-06 15:24 GMT+02:00 Urs L

Re: Score Layout, several questions

N. Andrew Walsh wrote > 3) Lastly, is there a general way to increase space between systems on a > page? I only have room for two to a page, but there looks like about .5cm > free along the bottom margin. I'd prefer to spread the systems out from > one > another a bit more; how can I do this? You

Re: Score Layout, several questions

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:38 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> Perhaps something like the attached image? FWIW when I set these, >> under _no circumstances_ do I try to replicate the non-continuous staff >> lines. >> >> -- >> Phil Holmes >>

Re: Score Layout, several questions

oh, heavens! I'm sorry, I didn't mean I was trying to reproduce them (and yes, that's what I meant about the score: it looks like that, though with oval noteheads. Just figuring out what printing technology they were using would be interesting to me. I wonder if they were deliberately using older t

Re: Score Layout, several questions

Am 06.04.2015 um 15:50 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh: oh, heavens! I'm sorry, I didn't mean I was trying to reproduce them (and yes, that's what I meant about the score: it looks like that, though with oval noteheads. Just figuring out what printing technology they were using would be interesting to

Re: Custom glyph articulation [WAS: Creating new articulation (adding to an internal alist) ]

Hello Pierre, Not sure I got what you’re after, can this help? Would need to be offset to the right, though: \version "2.19.17" myArticulationPath = #'((moveto0.58 0.91) (curveto 0.58 0.83 0.63 0.80 0.70 0.80) (curveto 0.90 0.80 0.87 1.15 1.11 1.

Re: Custom glyph articulation [WAS: Creating new articulation (adding to an internal alist) ]

This worked for me: %<-- SNIP - #(append! default-script-alist (list `("mon-articulation" . ( (text . ,#{ \markup \essai #}) (stencil . ,ly:text-interface::print) ; any other properties (toward-stem-shift-in-column

Re: Custom glyph articulation [WAS: Creating new articulation (adding to an internal alist) ]

However, in version 2.18.2, I discovered that I had to change the markup definition of essai slightly: %<-- SNIP - \version "2.18.2" %% Nothing realistic here, 'essai' is just to show something: essai = \markup *\center-align % <--- not needed in latest unstable* \scale #

Re: Lilyjazz from a blind user

Daniel, Sorry for my late reply. I'll send you the source files later today for those scores. Hopefully they won't be too hard to follow :-) Regards, Abraham On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Daniel Contreras [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n174065...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > I

Re: Lilyjazz from a blind user

Am 06.04.2015 um 19:40 schrieb tisimst: Daniel, Sorry for my late reply. I'll send you the source files later today for those scores. Hopefully they won't be too hard to follow :-) There will be usage-example files for most (or hopefully all) fonts available in openLilyLib soon, then togethe

Staff ends before \clef, \time and \key

Hi all, It's been quite a while since I last used LilyPond, and I finally decided to wrap up the last, huge edition I was working on for quite a while. Here is the first issue I'm running into: If I end a piece with a \bar "||" and after that only want to indicate a key/clef/time change, the

Re: Custom glyph articulation [WAS: Creating new articulation (adding to an internal alist) ]

Hi Jacques, Actually the aim here was more to understand how to modify the articulation script than to find a workaround. Thanks for trying though! Cheers, Pierre 2015-04-06 18:21 GMT+02:00 Jacques Menu : > Hello Pierre, > > Not sure I got what you’re after, can this help? Would need to be offse

Re: Custom glyph articulation [WAS: Creating new articulation (adding to an internal alist) ]

Hi Abraham, 2015-04-06 19:34 GMT+02:00 Abraham Lee : > However, in version 2.18.2, I discovered that I had to change the markup > definition of essai slightly: > Good point, thanks !! > > %<-- SNIP - > > \version "2.18.2" > > %% Nothing realistic here, 'essai' is just t

RE: Staff ends before \clef, \time and \key

Reinhold, I have done it under 2.18 with and without the clef change and the staff lines continue. Your snippet compiles correctly under 2.18. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On

Re: Staff ends before \clef, \time and \key

> On Apr 6, 2015, at 2:04 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:04:22 +0200 > From: Reinhold Kainhofer > Subject: Staff ends before \clef, \time and \key > > Hi all, > It's been quite a while since I last used LilyPond, and I finally > decided to w

Re: Reading a property

Hi everybody, here is an updated version where a small problem has been resolved (see attachment). I hope this can be useful for some people. If you have any suggestions, please go ahead. Maybe I'll do some cleanup and turn it into a snippet... Cheers, Klaus ColorSpan-Showcase.ly

Re: box around notes

Hi David, here's my first attempt to apply my drawing function to your project. Thanks again for sharing this really cool tool! I've played around with some settings, and I also experimented with the messed up dynamics problem when taking the engravers out of the score context. It works if you s

Re: box around notes

Nice work Klaus, thanks for sharing. Cheers, Pierre 2015-04-06 23:55 GMT+02:00 Klaus Blum : > Hi David, > > here's my first attempt to apply my drawing function to your project. > Thanks > again for sharing this really cool tool! > > I've played around with some settings, and I also experimented

Re: box around notes

BTW, regarding the smiley up on the last rest, did you see this: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=904 JFYI, Cheers Pierre 2015-04-07 0:04 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: > Nice work Klaus, thanks for sharing. > Cheers, > Pierre > > 2015-04-06 23:55 GMT+02:0

Re: Staff ends before \clef, \time and \key

2015-04-06 21:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Stephen Mrotek : > Reinhold, > > I have done it under 2.18 with and without the clef change and the staff > lines continue. > Your snippet compiles correctly under 2.18. > > Mark > > -Original Message- > From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.o

Re: box around notes

Am 07.04.2015 um 00:07 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: BTW, regarding the smiley up on the last rest, did you see this: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=904 What’s your reason to not code that one with smiley = #(define-markup-function …)? Just asking, it might be irrelevant to the output. Bu

documenting public Scheme functions

Hi list, Here's something which I think will be useful to Schemers. Public functions written in Scheme aren't documented (except in the source). (The list of "Scheme functions" in the Internals Reference consists of functions defined in C++ which are available in Scheme.) The attached will prod

Re: documenting public Scheme functions

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:53 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > Also, "pure-unpure-containers" ... > unpure-pure... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: documenting public Scheme functions

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:53 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi list, > > Here's something which I think will be useful to Schemers. > > Public functions written in Scheme aren't documented (except in the > source). (The list of "Scheme functions" in the Internals Reference > consists of functions de

Re: box around notes

Hi Simon, Hmm interesting question... Well, actually I don't remember, it's quite old now. What I can imagine is that I didn't want to have to add '\markup'-s, e.g.: title = \markup\smiley #size instead of: title = \smiley #size But to be honest, there must be a reason, I simply don't remember it

Re: documenting public Scheme functions

Hi David, Simply thank you very, very much!! Cheers, Pierre 2015-04-07 3:39 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik : > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:53 PM, David Nalesnik > wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> Here's something which I think will be useful to Schemers. >> >> Public functions written in Scheme aren't docu

Re: box around notes

I've add it as a markup, just in case. Cheers Pierre 2015-04-07 6:08 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: > Hi Simon, > Hmm interesting question... > Well, actually I don't remember, it's quite old now. > What I can imagine is that I didn't want to have to add '\m