On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
I am typesetting a simple Beethoven 4-mains. I am in the very first stage of
entering the notes - without additional tweaks to optimize the output.
Having entered one line of music it occurred to me that the spacing looks
quite sub-optimal. Not
Michael,
Sorry to pipe in so late in this conversation, but have you seen what's
going on at http://fonts.openlilylib.org? Your LilyJAZZ code, etc. is
from the original files, but I've taken them a step further, making it
easier to change music fonts.You might want to update your LilyJAZZ
stuf
Hi all,
I'm feeling more and more stupid by the minute, so I desperately hope to
get some help and enlightenment here.
I have a function that basically includes a LilyPond file, and it does
so quite well.
This is the working version of the file:
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/blo
The following snippet:
\version "2.19.15"
staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size) (number?)
#{
\set fontSize = #new-size
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep new-size)
\override StaffSymbol #'thickness = #(magstep new-size)
#})
Ab = \relative c' { f4
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Cynthia Karl wrote:
> The following snippet:
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size) (number?)
> #{
> \set fontSize = #new-size
> \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep new-size)
> \override StaffSymb
I should add that the original code was missing a right closing brace after
\staffSize #2 to close off the \with block.
James Worlton
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, James Worlton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Cynthia Karl wrote:
>
>> The following snippet:
>>
>> \version "2.19.15"
No problem on my side (see attached).
OS : Ubuntu 14.10
Frescobaldi 2.13
LP 2.19.16
Here's a compilable code:
\version "2.19.16"
staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size)
(number?)
#{
\set fontSize = #new-size
I can confirm the problem on windows. Using a greater range of notes produces
some "interesting" output...
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider
To: James Worlton
Cc: Cynthia Karl ; lilypond-user
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 3:26 PM
Subject:
The first 2 bars of a score are as follows:
invP = \tweak stencil ##f \p
\parallelMusic #'(mid Vone Vtwo Va Vc) {
% bar 0
\tempo 4 = 152 \partial 2 r2 |
\tempo "Allegro non troppo" 4 = 152 \partial 2 r2 |
\tempo "Allegro non troppo" 4 = 152 \partial 2 r2 |
\tempo "
The problem also exists on OSX (10.9.5) with 2.19.16.
2.18.2 still does it correctly.
I will test my linux machine later.
I'd say this constitutes a regression? The staffSize function doesn't seem
to do anything fancy or unusual.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I can con
Hi David,
I wasn't really able to make sense of everything you said. Have you
considered using a global variable that is in every staff? That can be
useful for adding things (you could put your invisible dynamics in it for
instance).
As for your question about the mid context I'm not sure exactly
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:12:23PM +, David Sumbler wrote:
> The first 2 bars of a score are as follows:
>
> invP = \tweak stencil ##f \p
>
> \parallelMusic #'(mid Vone Vtwo Va Vc) {
> % bar 0
> \tempo 4 = 152 \partial 2 r2 |
> \tempo "Allegro non troppo" 4 = 152 \partial 2 r2 |
>
2015-03-03 17:34 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry :
> The problem also exists on OSX (10.9.5) with 2.19.16.
>
> 2.18.2 still does it correctly.
>
> I will test my linux machine later.
>
> I'd say this constitutes a regression? The staffSize function doesn't seem
> to do anything fancy or unusual.
>
> On Tue,
I've attached the PDF output of your code, as run on my machine: Windows 7,
Frescobaldi 2.17.2, Lily 2.19.16.
James Worlton
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
>
> 2015-03-03 17:34 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry :
>
>> The problem also exists on OSX (10.9.5) with 2.19.16.
>>
>> 2.18.
Harm,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
>
> 2015-03-03 17:34 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry :
>
>> The problem also exists on OSX (10.9.5) with 2.19.16.
>>
>> 2.18.2 still does it correctly.
>>
>> I will test my linux machine later.
>>
>> I'd say this constitutes a regression? The st
Cynthia Karl wrote
> The following snippet:
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size) (number?)
> #{
> \set fontSize = #new-size
> \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep new-size)
> \override StaffSymbol #'thickness = #(magstep new-
2015-03-03 22:15 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik :
> Harm,
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-03-03 17:34 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry :
>>>
>>> The problem also exists on OSX (10.9.5) with 2.19.16.
>>>
>>> 2.18.2 still does it correctly.
>>>
>>> I will test my linux mac
Harm,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
>
> thanks for testing. So this function may use as a test-case.
>
> No idea whats causing this bug, though. And because I'm not able to
> reproduce it, I can't help furthermore :(
>
I don't think I could do anything either. I wouldn'
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:44 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Harm,
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> thanks for testing. So this function may use as a test-case.
>>
>> No idea whats causing this bug, though. And because I'm not able to
>> reproduce it, I can't help f
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:59 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:44 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>
>> Harm,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Morley
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for testing. So this function may use as a test-case.
>>>
>>> No idea whats causing thi
Well, there’s reason enough to redirect this to bug-lilypond, isn’t it?
Somehow, Mozilla Thunderbird messes up the code examples, so I can’t do
so well. Perhaps the OP’s and Harm’s first mails in the thread,
respectively, should suffice for illustration.
~Simon
Am 03.03.2015 um 23:01 schrieb
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> Well, there’s reason enough to redirect this to bug-lilypond, isn’t it?
> Somehow, Mozilla Thunderbird messes up the code examples, so I can’t do so
> well. Perhaps the OP’s and Harm’s first mails in the thread, respectively,
> should suffi
Simon Albrecht mail.de> writes:
>
> Well, there’s reason enough to redirect this to bug-lilypond, isn’t
> it?
Thanks for finding the bug, and confirming that it is a bug and not just
a misunderstanding, and narrowing down the cause, and posting to bug-lilypond.
The relevant code did no
23 matches
Mail list logo
