Hi Joram,
I've been reading and trying to get this to work, experimenting.
In order to output midi and pdf your code must be put in a score block
with a layout and midi block inside. As soon as I enclose the code in
the \score block Lilypond says it cannot find voice "voice". I tried
using quotes
Hi Again,
I thought I better be a little clearer. Lilypond states it cannot find
voice. The pdf includes the high hat notes. The high hat notes are
missing from the midi file???
Namaste,
Kevin
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 09:04 +0100, Kevin Tough wrote:
> Hi Joram,
>
> I've been reading and trying to
Hi all,
this is somewhat off-topic, but I hope you won't mind the advertisment -
in the end there *is* quite some LilyPond in it.
On Feb 18, 8-9.30 PM CET I will be on Deutschlandradio Kultur,
presenting my second largest recording project, a 2 CD set with
historical Schoenberg arrangements.
Dear Marc,
Il 21/01/15 05.12, MarcM ha scritto:
on Mac, when I launch Frescobaldi it does not show the document. I always
have to go to " Window > New Window" to see the lilypond code and the music.
Is there a workaround?
It appears to be the problem described in
https://github.com/wbsoft/fres
Hi list,
in the project, Iam currently working on, I am importing music-xml-files
created by Score Perfect. I have to "repair" all of the files and remove
the work-part. That way most files can be converted, but some files fail
with the message:
AttributeError: PartGroupInfo instance has no attrib
Hi Jan-Peter,
I’m very familiar with musicxml2ly. I can offer to have a look at your files
(tomorrow or sunday).
Cheers,
Patrick
On 06.02.2015, at 11:57, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> in the project, Iam currently working on, I am importing music-xml-files
> created by Score Perfect.
Tank you :)
I'll send one later
Cheers,
Jan-Peter
Am 6. Februar 2015 12:08:09 MEZ, schrieb pls :
>Hi Jan-Peter,
>
>I’m very familiar with musicxml2ly. I can offer to have a look at your
>files (tomorrow or sunday).
>
>Cheers,
>Patrick
>On 06.02.2015, at 11:57, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
>
>> Hi li
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 11:57 +0100, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> in the project, Iam currently working on, I am importing music-xml-files
> created by Score Perfect. I have to "repair" all of the files and remove
> the work-part. That way most files can be converted, but some files fail
>
Am 06.02.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hi list,
in the project, Iam currently working on, I am importing music-xml-files
created by Score Perfect. I have to "repair" all of the files and remove
the work-part. That way most files can be converted, but some files fail
with the message:
A
Is this possible to accomplish in LilyPond?
I have two wishes:
1. To put the short coda on its own staff, but without breaking the
line. Just a short space to the preceding staff.
2. To put the key signature before the final bar line, so this will be
the really last bar line on the staff.
Hello Kaj,
you can put an empty measure in between and interrupt the staff lines via
\stopStaff and \startStaff.
The huge override section is taken from a snippet, it's needed to have the
natural sign before the double bar line. I hope this helps:
% -
Wow!
That was a solution! Should never had found it myself, and, to be
honest, do not understand it neither. Not yet, but I will try to. And
obviously it works.
So Klaus, danke schön!
Den 2015-02-06 15:22, skrev Klaus Blum:
Hello Kaj,
you can put an empty measure in between and interrupt t
Hi all,
I"m trying to widen the parentheses so the left brace doesn't collide with
the sharp. The code I'm trying isn't working. Is this possible?
\version "2.19.15"
parenWider = {
\once \override ParenthesesItem #'X-extent = #'(-8 . 0)
}
\score {
\new Staff { \parenWider \parenthesize fis'
Hi James,
I understand the idea but I thing you missunderstand the X-extent effect.
If I follow you, you'd rather extent the note head.
So here it goes :
\version "2.19.15"
parenWider = {
\once\override NoteHead.X-extent = #'(-1.5 . 1.3)
\once\override Accidental.X-extent = #'(1.5 . 0)
\on
Thanks, Pierre. That's exactly what I'm looking for. So what does the
ParenthesesItem X-extent do?
James W
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I understand the idea but I thing you missunderstand the X-extent effect.
As english isn't my native language I'm not sure to find the right words.
Manual says it "computes the width of an object" (see:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/callback-functions.html
).
With "my" words I'd say that it'll help you to add or reduce the space
before and/or afte
Hi Urs,
I worked out one of the problems.
If there is only one lilyglyph in the message, surrounding it with the
"@"-s is fine.
This works:
message = "Is this @\lilyDynamics{p}@ necessary?"
If there are two lilyglyphs in the one annotate message the "@"-s need to
surround both.
This doesn't
Hi List,
Has anyone been using annotate with a multi movement work?
Annotate correctly recognises the measures and bars (obviously) but there
is no way for someone reading the critical report to know which of the
three movements it is referring to.
Any advice?
Craig
_
Figured it out! I went back to Thomas' recommendation and did this:
\score {
<<
\new Staff { \mynotes }
\new TabStaff {
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = \stringTuning { \repeat unfold
24 { s1 } } }
>>
}
I simply needed to unfold skipped measures 24 times, and I took out the
\break as the string
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As english isn't my native language I'm not sure to find the right words.
> Manual says it "computes the width of an object" (see:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/callback-fu
Hi Urs,
A solution:
If I use \emph instead of \textit it works.
This works:
message = "Should the @\emph{cresc.} begin here or immediately after
the preceeding \lilyDynamics{pp}@?"
Craig
On Sat Feb 07 2015 at 5:28:59 AM Craig Dabelstein <
craig.dabelst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Urs,
>
Oups, I forgot that!
I'll check for a workaround.
BTW, there was this solution but looks strange with flats:
\score {
\new Staff {
\parenthesize cis'4. s8 \parenthesize bes4.
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\override ParenthesesItem.stencil = #(lambda (grob)
(let* (
Am 6. Februar 2015 20:39:17 MEZ, schrieb Craig Dabelstein
:
>Hi List,
>
>Has anyone been using annotate with a multi movement work?
I'm sure nobody has used it at all so far as it is only a few days old ...
>Annotate correctly recognises the measures and bars (obviously) but
>there
>is no way
This context override is getting me to where I need these to be. Thanks!
For this project (a Theory exam), There are no flats, so the strange
vertical offset it seems to make isn't an issue.
James W
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Am 06.02.2015 um 20:39 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi List,
Has anyone been using annotate with a multi movement work?
Annotate correctly recognises the measures and bars (obviously) but
there is no way for someone reading the critical report to know which
of the three movements it is referring
See attached score file -- work in progress
On Sat Feb 07 2015 at 6:46:18 AM Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Am 06.02.2015 um 20:39 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
>
> Hi List,
>
> Has anyone been using annotate with a multi movement work?
> Annotate correctly recognises the measures and bars (obviously) but th
Hi Craig,
Am 06.02.2015 um 20:28 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi Urs,
I worked out one of the problems.
Thank you for testing. This at least shows me where the problem is -
unfortunately an area I'm quite unfamiliar with ...
If there is only one lilyglyph in the message, surrounding it with
Hi all,
can anybody tell me what happens when I have a Scheme engraver (as in
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/blob/master/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily
starting around l. 105) and compile a file with more than one \score block?
I assume that _somehow_ the engraver will restart
That sounds like the right way to go -- choose one format for the messages.
I don't have much experience with this, but I'm excellent at using trial
and error, and happy to help with the testing.
I live in Brisbane, Australia, and do a lot of typesetting for a
conductor/composer who lives in Texa
> OK, the problem seems to be that the regular expression that matches "any text
> between two "@" characters" doesn't correctly work when there are more than
> two
> such characters in the string. I would have to sort out how that regular
> expression can match these pairs independently.
Hi Urs,
Am 06.02.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
That sounds like the right way to go -- choose one format for the
messages.
OK, I'll think about how to do that.
I don't have much experience with this, but I'm excellent at using
trial and error, and happy to help with the testing.
I live
Am 06.02.2015 um 22:03 schrieb Noeck:
OK, the problem seems to be that the regular expression that matches "any text
between two "@" characters" doesn't correctly work when there are more than two
such characters in the string. I would have to sort out how that regular
expression can match these
Hi Urs,
to be a bit more clear and verbose:
>> Usually a question mark should solve this:
>> @.*@ versus @.*?@
The former matches the longest possible string enclosed in @’s:
For “This @is@ a simple @Test@!”, the matched pattern is:
“@is@ a simple @Test@”.
The latter matches the shortest poss
Am 06.02.2015 um 20:28 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
I still can't get italic text to work.
@\textit{cresc.}@
OK, I see now that when annotate takes the text inside the @-s as
literal the "\t" is interpreted as a tabulator character ...
So this must be addressed (except that the discussed recons
On 2015-02-06 4:18 PM, Noeck wrote:
You could also enforce this by now allowing all characters between the @:
e.g. @[-a-zA-Z\\_]*@
Rather than include all characters not "@" it would be better to simply
exclude "@". I.e.:
@[^@]*@
The "^", when it is the first character inside a brace chang
Am 06.02.2015 um 22:46 schrieb Br. Samuel Springuel:
On 2015-02-06 4:18 PM, Noeck wrote:
You could also enforce this by now allowing all characters between
the @:
e.g. @[-a-zA-Z\\_]*@
Rather than include all characters not "@" it would be better to
simply exclude "@". I.e.:
@[^@]*@
The
Hi Kevin,
I cc David Kastrup, he recently worked on addlyrics and the like.
2015-02-06 9:11 GMT+01:00 Kevin Tough :
> Hi Again,
>
> I thought I better be a little clearer. Lilypond states it cannot find
> voice. The pdf includes the high hat notes. The high hat notes are
> missing from the midi f
Hi List,
Sorry for the frustrating question, but how do I combine Samuel's code
-- @[^@]*@
-- with an annotate message such as -- "Should the @\textit{cresc.} begin
here or immediately after the preceeding \lilyDynamics{pp}@?"
Craig
On Sat Feb 07 2015 at 7:49:15 AM Urs Liska wrote:
>
> Am 06.
Am 07.02.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi List,
Sorry for the frustrating question, but how do I combine Samuel's code
-- @[^@]*@ -- with an annotate message such as -- "Should the
@\textit{cresc.} begin here or immediately after the preceeding
\lilyDynamics{pp}@?"
You don't do t
>
> Maybe. In any case it seems to work for the problem at hand, while
> "@.*?@" did not work.
>
The sequence ".*" does indeed mean "any character, 0 or more times"
However, following that by "?" is meaningless, since the "?" is
supposed to modify some character spec meaning "the previous
dv"
> }
> \lyricsto "dv" { One Two Three Four }
> >>
>
>\score {
> \m
> \layout { }
>}
>
>\score {
> \m
> \midi { }
>}
>
>The need to do both:
>associatedVoice = "dv"
>_and_
>\lyricsto "dv"
>is strange, though.
>
>
Am 07.02.2015 um 00:40 schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 07.02.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi List,
Sorry for the frustrating question, but how do I combine Samuel's
code -- @[^@]*@ -- with an annotate message such as -- "Should the
@\textit{cresc.} begin here or immediately after the prece
Hello,
This is a tremolo https://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/cmn/cmn/cmn.html
Unfortunately, I dont know right now where to find it in the doc.
Greetings
2015-02-06 22:10 GMT-05:00, MING TSANG :
> Hi lilyponders,
> I transcribe a score and I dont know how tackle the past measure. (refer to
> the
Ming,
Look for "tremolo repeats" in the Notation Reference.
Stan
> On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:10 PM, MING TSANG wrote:
>
> Hi lilyponders,
>
> I transcribe a score and I dont know how tackle the past measure. (refer to
> the png file. - the three slanted line on 2nd 8th chord and the last half
>
Dear Urs,
All good.
I've followed all your instructions -- no problem.
However, perhaps I'm putting \setOption scholarly.annotate.export-targets
#'("latex" "plaintext") in the wrong place. I put this in the
"main-init.ily" file, yes?
When I try to engrave the score I get this error:
Parsing...
Here's the direct link:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/short-repeats#tremolo-repeats
HTH,
Abraham
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:26 PM, temp files [via Lilypond]
wrote:
> Ming,
>
> Look for "tremolo repeats" in the Notation Reference.
>
> Stan
>
> On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:10 PM,
Am 7. Februar 2015 04:47:11 MEZ, schrieb Craig Dabelstein
:
>Dear Urs,
>
>All good.
>
>I've followed all your instructions -- no problem.
>
>However, perhaps I'm putting \setOption
>scholarly.annotate.export-targets
>#'("latex" "plaintext") in the wrong place. I put this in the
>"main-init.ily"
47 matches
Mail list logo
