Dear All of you,
Thank you very much.
I'm richer with two types of solutions
One perfect copy http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=973
And another with not as complicated demands that Pierre suggested
http://www.lilypondforum.de/index.php?topic=1801.msg9962#msg9962
I attache it, for me it is more h
2015-01-28 19:00 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler :
>> 2015-01-27 12:56 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler :
>> > I use Staff.printKeyCancellation = ##f in my score.
>> >
>> > At one point the key changes from C major (concert) to C minor. As the
>> > piece is for a standard saxophone quartet, this means that 2 of th
2015-01-29 10:58 GMT+01:00 Rita Composer :
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=973
>
Dear Sister Judith,
Dear Trevor, Franck and Daniel,
I don't if you've noticed that I modified this snippet this morning for
easier typesetting (just click on the LSR image to see the code).
e.g.
\lst a \tst g
In the following I have inserted \shiftOn and \shiftOff commands in a
vain attempt to get the chord in the second voice to be displaced
to the left of the a8 in voice one. I have even repeated the command
immediately before these notes, but to no avail. (I am hoping it will
fix the collision of th
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Shann
wrote:
> In the following I have inserted \shiftOn and \shiftOff commands in a
> vain attempt to get the chord in the second voice to be displaced
> to the left of the a8 in voice one. I have even repeated the command
> immediately before these note
Hi Richard
I quote from the Notation Reference:
"The \shiftOn command allows (but does not force) the notes in a voice to be
shifted. When \shiftOn is applied to a voice, a note or chord in that voice is
shifted only if its stem would otherwise collide with a stem from another
voice, and only
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 08:44 -0600, James Worlton wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Shann
> wrote:
> In the following I have inserted \shiftOn and \shiftOff
> commands in a
> vain attempt to get the chord in the second voice to be
> displaced
>
On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/real-music-example
This example actually nicely illustrates one of the things I've found
frustrating about working with Lilypond: why is it necessary to do so much
deliberate annotation
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 14:52 +, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Hi Richard
>
> I quote from the Notation Reference:
>
> "The \shiftOn command allows (but does not force) the notes in a voice to be
> shifted. When \shiftOn is applied to a voice, a note or chord in that voice
> is shifted only if its
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 09:57 -0500, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/real-music-example
>
> This example actually nicely illustrates one of the things I've found
> frustrating about working with Lily
Ted Lemon wrote Thursday, January 29, 2015 2:57 PM
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/real-music-example
>
> This example actually nicely illustrates one of the things I've found
> frustrating about working with Lil
On Jan 29, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Certainly the latter. But quite a lot of work has been done. More than a
> few of the examples of overrides in the earlier manuals have had to be
> removed, as LilyPond now does that particular right thing out of the box.
> There is alway
Richard Shann wrote Thursday, January 29, 2015 2:58 PM
> On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 14:52 +, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>
>> You'll find a clue for doing what you want if you examine the example here:
>>
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/real-music-example
>
> Hmm, that e
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:28 +, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Richard Shann wrote Thursday, January 29, 2015 2:58 PM
>
>
> > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 14:52 +, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> >>
> >> You'll find a clue for doing what you want if you examine the example here:
> >>
> >> http://www.lilypond.o
Dear Harm,
Am 15.01.2015 um 03:22 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> arpeggioUp =
> -\tweak #'stencil #ly:arpeggio::print
> -\tweak #'X-extent #ly:arpeggio::width
> -\tweak #'arpeggio-direction #UP
> \arpeggio
I came back to this today and I like this simple approach most.
One more question: what are the
Noeck wrote
> Dear Harm,
>
> Am 15.01.2015 um 03:22 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> arpeggioUp =
>> -\tweak #'stencil #ly:arpeggio::print
>> -\tweak #'X-extent #ly:arpeggio::width
>> -\tweak #'arpeggio-direction #UP
>> \arpeggio
>
> I came back to this today and I like this simple approach most.
>
> O
Am 29.01.2015 um 18:08 schrieb tisimst:
> Nice work, Harm!
+1
> Anyone willing to help get this (and similar code for "arpeggioDown") pushed
> into "property-init.ly"? Shouldn't be too hard to get through and would be a
> nice (i.e., more intuitive) syntax, especially for new users, IMHO.
+1
I
Is it possible to retrieve the current file path in Scheme?
When using any sort of file name it is considered relative to the *compiled*
file and not to the file that is currently parsed.
I mean, this is what relative-includes is for, but I don't see how I can
achieve something like this in Schem
On 2015-01-28 21:45, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Thank you Anders,
myNotes = \relative c' { \pedA a2\5 \pedF cis'2\4 } seems to work.
It seems that your function cannot be applied into a chord.
Well, I don't know what to say...
Ok, now I understand the error message: not a
rhythmic
On 2015-01-29 00:13, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-01-28 17:55 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se :
On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Not sure, whether it's the wanted output, though, how about:
It fixed the problem but it didn't output the notes I wanted.
The problem has to do with t
Am 29.01.2015 um 22:16 schrieb and...@andis59.se:
On 2015-01-29 00:13, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-01-28 17:55 GMT+01:00 and...@andis59.se :
On 2015-01-28 17:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Not sure, whether it's the wanted output, though, how about:
It fixed the problem but it didn't out
On 2015-01-29 22:18, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 29.01.2015 um 22:16 schrieb and...@andis59.se:
But I wonder about where I can find documentation on functions like:
ly:music-property
ly:music-set-property!
...
The Scheme functions that are Lilypond related.
They are here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v
Lilyponders.\version "2.19.15"\language "english"
{ a1 a'\arpeggio 1\arpeggio %m09} I run the above lily code and I got
the following warning message. The arpeggio did not show on the
score.Immanuel,Ming.
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.15 [test_nothing-but-leaves.ly]...Processing
`C:/Users
> a'\arpeggio
Hi Ming,
and how would you expect that to be played?
Is it different from a'?
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ming,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:08 PM, MING TSANG wrote:
> Lilyponders.
> \version "2.19.15"
> \language "english"
>
> {
>a1 a'\arpeggio 1\arpeggio %m09
> }
> I run the above lily code and I got the following warning message. The
> arpeggio did not show on the score.
> Immanuel,
> Ming.
>
> "Ali" == Ali Cuota writes:
Ali> Hello, I wonder how to codify correctly this minimal example:
Ali> \relative c' {
Ali> \partial 8
Ali> \repeat volta 2 { d8 d4 d8 d }
Ali> \alternative { { d4. s8 } { d2 } }
Ali> d8 d8 d8 d8 d2
Ali> }
I'd do it as
\relative c' {
\partial 8 d8
\repeat vo
I also ran into this problem recently. Here is what I came up with as a
visually acceptable solution:
/\version "2.19"
\relative c' {
\once \override Arpeggio.positions = #'(-2 . 1)
\once \override Stem.extra-offset = #'(0 . 1)
\once \override Stem.length-fraction = #0.75
MING TSANG wrote:
The arpeggio did not show on the score.
If you insist on it showing (for this _single_ note),
try applying the workaround given for issue 794
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=794
Result shown for 2.18.2.
Cheers,
Robin
_
2015-01-29 18:08 GMT+01:00 tisimst :
> Noeck wrote
>> Dear Harm,
>>
>> Am 15.01.2015 um 03:22 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>>> arpeggioUp =
>>> -\tweak #'stencil #ly:arpeggio::print
>>> -\tweak #'X-extent #ly:arpeggio::width
>>> -\tweak #'arpeggio-direction #UP
>>> \arpeggio
>>
>> I came back to this tod
Dear Urs,
I incorporated annotate into one of my current scores and it is fantastic.
I can't wait for the Latex package to go along with it.
Thanks for all you hard work.
Craig
On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 8:35:07 PM Noeck wrote:
> > I hope my other reply is a sufficient answer to this?
>
> Yes, of
a cross staff arpeggio
Ha! I think I know where to find this one:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#Selected-Snippets-33
✝
Br. Samuel, OSB
(R. Padraic Springuel)
PAX ☧ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ
_
Ming,
%this in the “new staff” group
\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
Mark
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of MING
TSANG
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:25 PM
To: Robin Bannister;
Dear Craig,
thank you for the report.
Am 30.01.2015 um 03:28 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Dear Urs,
I incorporated annotate into one of my current scores and it is
fantastic.
Great. Just to let me know: did you experience any troubles or is it as
simple as I think to get it to run?
I can'
Hello,
I’ tried the LaTeX package. Annotations are well included and it looks
promising. But the beginning of the file causes an error due to the sharp
symbol in the first part of the file (the part before the \musicalissue )
Error:
(./annotate.annotations.inp
./annotate.annotations.inp:1: You
Am 30.01.2015 um 08:07 schrieb Philippe Massart:
Hello,
I’ tried the LaTeX package. Annotations are well included and it looks
promising. But the beginning of the file causes an error due to the
sharp symbol in the first part of the file (the part before the
\musicalissue )
Error:
(./annot
>
> Probably not. I assume that hash hasn't been properly filtered. Could you
> please post the generated .inp and maybe also the LilyPond file?
>
> Urs
>
These are based on the sample file included :
annotate.annotations.inp
Description: Binary data
annotate.ly
Description: Binary dat
Am 30.01.2015 um 08:13 schrieb Philippe Massart:
Probably not. I assume that hash hasn't been properly filtered. Could you
please post the generated .inp and maybe also the LilyPond file?
Urs
These are based on the sample file included :
Ah, OK.
I see the offending LaTeX code, but I'll
37 matches
Mail list logo
