Am 25.09.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Julien Rioux:
On 24/09/2014 11:52 AM, Xirux Nefer wrote:
I am using lilypond-book to compile solfeo.lytex:
[...]
[...]
Thanks for your report. This seems to me like the same issue as
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2471
Ah, ok. I wasn't
I have a hymnal in which many songs have time signatures with symbols
"cc" and "¢¢" [doubled cut-time symbol]. I can't find any information on
these online. Does anyone know what they actually mean? Were they
common historically, or is this hymnal just using them ad hoc?
My hypothesis based on
Paul
>
> Hi Jay, You don't need to use string->symbol to do this.
> #abc will return the value of abc (the string IamJustAText), just like
\abc
> does.
I should have made my question clearer. The string in string->symbol is a
generated string. I have changed the example program as below to
Am 26.09.2014 um 04:10 schrieb Dan Eble:
I have a hymnal in which many songs have time signatures with symbols
"cc" and "¢¢" [doubled cut-time symbol]. I can't find any information on
these online. Does anyone know what they actually mean? Were they
common historically, or is this hymnal just
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Now the interpretation and history of the various time signatures derived in
some way from mensural notation is a complex issue, as is the disambiguation
of c and cut c.
One of the things I remember from my music Theory and History classes is
that
Hello list, hello Simon,,
thank's for that, just a little correction:
You wrote:
> The double cut c time signature occurs in Schubert, op. 90, no. 4
It's definitely
Schubert, op. 90, no. 3 instead of
Schubert, op. 90, no. 4
> disambiguation of c and cut c. There are numerous historical
> depe
Davide Liessi gmail.com> writes:
> The warning is correct: 'fontload' is not among the possible options
> What were you trying to achieve with that option?
I swear I saw that in the documentation, ha ha... although after 3 days
reading lilypond's docs I may have ended up suffering spectral visio
Hello list, hello Martin,
You wrote:
> One of the things I remember from my music Theory and History classes is
> that C had not much to do with the letter "C" but was in fact half of a
> circle. The Circle O was used when there were 3 beats in a measure, the
> Tempus Perfectum, 3 being the Hol
Dear People,
It works perfect in the example from Lilypond documentation but in my projects
they refuse to go left or right, only up or down.
What am doing wrong ?
Here my .ly file, (left on bar 5):
\version "2.18.2"
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a4")
#(layout-set-absolute-staff-size (* 22.
Remember (if it was ever pointed out), perfection in this case means simply
completeness. God is complete (perfect) in Himself, people are incomplete
(imperfect). According to Church theology, at least. Maybe we are just
especially aware of our incompleteness these days. Or we simply prefer
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Terpstra"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 3:15 PM
Subject: fingeringOrientations refuse to go left or right.
Dear People,
It works perfect in the example from Lilypond documentation but in my
projects they refuse to go left or right, only up o
Phil Holmes wrote:
> Posting a huge amount of music to illustrate a small point?
>
> Perhaps you could cut this down to a tiny example.
Ah, ..so sorry
Would like to cancel it.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.or
Hi Peter,
Try :
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
8\< g' e g gis' d gis\!
Cheers,
Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2014-09-26 16:15 GMT+02:00 Peter Terpstra :
> It works perfect in the example from Lilypond documentation but in my
> projects they refuse to go left or right, only up or down.
Which snippet?
You are not enclosing the note in a chord construct <>:
The placement of fingering numbers can be contr
I wonder if this problem has occurred with 2.18.2, but I have not tried it.
Anyone understand why the composer is coming out all the way to the right
of the margin? see attached.
Sincerely,
Josh
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Joshua Nichols
wrote:
I wonder if this problem has occurred with 2.18.2, but I have not
tried it.
Anyone understand why the composer is coming out all the way to the
right of the margin? see attached.
Sincerely,
Josh
Josh,
I, personally, haven't noticed
Thanks Abraham. See attached.
Thank you for the tremendous and hard work you have put to explore
alternate fonts. I am in debt to you (for which I might just donate ;) ).
IC,
Josh
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Abraham Lee
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Joshua Nichols
> wrote:
>
My guess is that it has nothing to do with the new fonts.
See this issue https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4102
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Strange-happenings-with-alternate-music-fonts-2-19-14-tp166835p166838.html
Sent from the User
Can't you also just say:
c4\finger "3-5"
?
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> 2014-09-26 16:15 GMT+02:00 Peter Terpstra :
>
>> It works perfect in the example from Lilypond documentation but in my
>> projects they refuse to go left or right, onl
Hello,
In the attached file, Stem Up Lower.ly, the stems are correctly aligned.
When the pitches are raised an octave (where they should be), Stem Up
Upper.ly, the stems conflict.
What must I do to get the upper version have the same stem alignment as the
lower?
Thank you for your kind
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Joshua Nichols
wrote:
Thanks Abraham. See attached.
Thank you for the tremendous and hard work you have put to explore
alternate fonts. I am in debt to you (for which I might just donate
;) ).
IC,
Josh
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Abraham Lee
wrote:
Thanks! I'm glad to hear that you find them useful. Donations are not required,
but certainly appreciated :)
Regards,
Abraham
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 26, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Joshua Nichols [via Lilypond]
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Abraham. See attached.
>
> Thank you for the tremendous and har
That's the one I was referring to :) Thank you for referencing the issue's
link.
Regards,
Abraham
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 26, 2014, at 1:54 PM, TaoCG [via Lilypond]
> wrote:
>
> My guess is that it has nothing to do with the new fonts.
> See this issue https://code.google.com/p/lilypo
Jay Vara wrote:
In the following program, I set xyz to the variable abc using scheme
string->symbol as well as the usual \abc.
Instead of giving the same value for xyz, the first one sets it to string
"abc" and the second sets it to value of abc.
Maybe you are reading out the symbol name (whic
> (or rather, the empty markup)...
What do you mean? I don't see an empty markup.
> So it must be the current composer...
Is it too long?
IC,
Josh
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Abraham Lee
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Joshua Nichols
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Abraham. See attached
Federico Bruni wrote:
> You are not enclosing the note in a chord construct <>:
>
> The placement of fingering numbers can be controlled precisely. For
> fingering orientation to apply, you must use a chord construct <> even if
> it is a single note.
Absolutely right, how silly of me to forget t
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Joshua Nichols
wrote:
> (or rather, the empty markup)...
What do you mean? I don't see an empty markup.
> So it must be the current composer...
Is it too long?
IC,
Josh
Josh,
It's not that YOU put empty markup in it, but that the other header
properties
Robin
> The following seems to read out the value of abc:
> > xyz = #(eval (string->symbol "abc") (interaction-environment))
>
Wow, that works! Thanks. I had not noticed interaction-environment when I
read the guile manual. I will read through that section this weekend to
understand why th
Waltzes are only sort of in 3/4 time. If you play them properly.
Shane
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Conor Cook wrote:
> Remember (if it was ever pointed out), perfection in this case means simply
> completeness. God is complete (perfect) in Himself, people are incomplete
> (imperfect).
> It's not that YOU put empty markup in it,
Oh, that is a relief. I'm always afraid of being more blatantly stupid in
this things. Thanks for clarifying!
I did go through the motions of getting 2.18.2 to work, and you are exactly
right. I apologize for being lazy and not trying that first. At any
Hi,
I've managed to make some real progress getting my head around
Lillypond, and I'd have to say that the output quality is awesome
compared to what I'd previously been using.
I've spent a few hours looking, tried a lot of things and still cannot
get what I'm after here.
In the pared-down (b
31 matches
Mail list logo
