custom markup for \tempo

2014-04-04 Thread Simon Bailey
hello, the list! i have constructed the following: %%% SNIP %%% #(define-markup-command (nbTempo layout props expression beat tempo) (markup? string? markup?) (interpret-markup layout props #{ \markup { \override #'(baseline-skip . 2) \column { \concat {

Re: custom markup for \tempo

2014-04-04 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Op Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:19:40 +0200 Simon Bailey schreef: > hello, the list! > > i have constructed the following: > > %%% SNIP %%% > #(define-markup-command > (nbTempo layout props expression beat tempo) > (markup? string? markup?) > (interpret-markup layout props > #{ > \markup

Shorten ledger lines

2014-04-04 Thread Urs Liska
Hi, a question that has been asked by several people recently: Can ledger lines be shortened explicitly? I have only found info about automatic shortening together with accidentals. But there are cases where one wants to shorten them manually, particularly for very dense spacing. Is that pos

Re: Shorten ledger lines

2014-04-04 Thread Fredrik Wallberg
Hi Urs, you could try: \override Staff.LedgerLineSpanner.length-fraction = 0.5 / Fredrik ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: custom markup for \tempo

2014-04-04 Thread Simon Bailey
hi, On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > > Make nbTempo a music function that accepts the arguments and calls the > markup command (which I renamed to nbTempomkup). Like this: > d'oh. well that was sufficiently simple that i'm ashamed i asked. i will never try programmin

Re: Shorten ledger lines

2014-04-04 Thread Urs Liska
Am 04.04.2014 12:35, schrieb Fredrik Wallberg: Hi Urs, you could try: \override Staff.LedgerLineSpanner.length-fraction = 0.5 / Fredrik Thanks, that's exactly what I needed :-) Somehow I thought this must be possible with a property override but wasn't bold enough to simply pretend I knew

Re: Getting rid of initial brace on piano score

2014-04-04 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi David, >> I like that one. >> I've put it in the LSR (see : http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=909) >> I'll delete it if any problem. >> Cheers, >> ~Pierre See modified snippet here : http://l

Re: Getting rid of initial brace on piano score

2014-04-04 Thread Peter Toye
David, Thanks - but it's now complaining about the dot! I may try upgrading over the weekend - but really must get down to the piano practice! Best regards, Peter mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com www.ptoye.com - Thursday, April 3, 2014, 9:52:06 PM, you wrote: Hi Peter, On

command line option that prevents generation of midi?

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Morris
Is there a command line option that will prevent the generation of midi? I couldn't find one in the docs.[1] [1] http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/command-line-option-that-pr

Re: command line option that prevents generation of midi?

2014-04-04 Thread SoundsFromSound
Paul Morris wrote > Is there a command line option that will prevent the generation of midi? > I couldn't find one in the docs.[1] > > [1] > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage > > -Paul Hi Paul, I'm not sure if I'm able to answer your question 100% but,

Re: command line option that prevents generation of midi?

2014-04-04 Thread SoundsFromSound
Paul Morris wrote > Is there a command line option that will prevent the generation of midi? > I couldn't find one in the docs.[1] > > [1] > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage > > -Paul Are you using \midi blocks then, I assume? but you want to suppress

the next step?

2014-04-04 Thread b...@wolfcomposer.com
Dear All, A friend of mine asked a few questions about a pipe-organ piece i'd written that was performed recently. i ended up making two sheets of examples for him, one with a table of canons in two voices , the other i

Re: command line option that prevents generation of midi?

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Morris
SoundsFromSound wrote > Are you using \midi blocks then, I assume? but you want to suppress them? Hi Ben, Yes, that's it. Given a file with a \midi block, looking for a way to suppress midi output from the command line. It doesn't seem like it doesn't exist. (I tried your command and the midi

Re: command line option that prevents generation of midi?

2014-04-04 Thread SoundsFromSound
Paul Morris wrote > > SoundsFromSound wrote >> Are you using \midi blocks then, I assume? but you want to suppress >> them? > Hi Ben, Yes, that's it. Given a file with a \midi block, looking for a > way to suppress midi output from the command line. It doesn't seem like > it doesn't exist. (I

Re: command line option that prevents generation of midi?

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Morris
SoundsFromSound wrote > I'm 99.999% sure that it's not possible to do what you're after, / > unless / > you comment out/delete the MIDI block. I think? > > Are you able to comment it out or does that interfere somehow? Yes, I can just comment it out, or delete the midi file afterwards, so it's

Re: command line option that prevents generation of midi?

2014-04-04 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Paul Morris wrote: Is there a command line option that will prevent the generation of midi? I couldn't find one in the docs.[1] Not really a lilypond commandline option, but on my linux commandline I could do a one line command like lilypond my_example.ly && rm -f my_

Re: Whiteout Sextuplet

2014-04-04 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 03.04.2014 00:45, schrieb Graeme Lee: On 3-Apr 8:59, Joshua Nichols wrote: Hello all, I'm having trouble with this: global = { \override TupletNumber.whiteout = ##t } Use \omit TupletNumber If you want it back: \undo \omit TupletNumber Whiteout is a different thing: it doesn't turn t

Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows

2014-04-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
David Kastrup writes: > So my first impulse would be to throw out the workaround for 2.4.2 that Let's do that. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ l

Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows

2014-04-04 Thread David Kastrup
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> So my first impulse would be to throw out the workaround for 2.4.2 that > > Let's do that. Well, issue 1933 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1933> would suggest that this is a bad idea. Nothing substantially has changed si