64-bit font problems in GUB

2014-01-23 Thread Simon Bailey
Hello, I kicked this thread off last week sometime: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00762.html TL/DR summary: ligatures were not being shown for lilypond-generated output. further investigation led me to: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00804.

Re: 64-bit font problems in GUB

2014-01-23 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Simon Bailey" To: "lilypond-user Mailinglist" Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:20 AM Subject: 64-bit font problems in GUB Hello, I kicked this thread off last week sometime: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00762.html TL/DR sum

Re: Non-standard notation challenges (no game this time...)

2014-01-23 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" To: "lilypond-user" Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:59 PM Subject: Non-standard notation challenges (no game this time...) Hi all, I'm facing some notation challenges that aren't part of a self-devised "contest", but in way very real. I'm

When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from \override Stem #'length to \override Stem.length I would like to know in which LilyPond version this appeared. Somehow I don't seem to be able to think of the right search terms to locate the commit(s). Concretely, I have a snippet that need

Re: bar-check warning when generating rehearsal midi soprano, alto, tenor etc

2014-01-23 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "MING TSANG" Cc: "lilypond-user mailinglist" Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 2:15 AM Subject: Re: bar-check warning when generating rehearsal midi soprano, alto,tenor etc MING TSANG writes: When compile the .ly there is no warning

Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from > > \override Stem #'length > to > \override Stem.length > > I would like to know in which LilyPond version this appeared. > Somehow I don't seem to be able to think of the right search terms to > locate the commit(s). conve

Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from > > \override Stem #'length > to > \override Stem.length > > I would like to know in which LilyPond version this appeared. 2.17.6, http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2883> -- David Kastrup

Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread Peter Bjuhr
On 01/23/2014 10:40 AM, Urs Liska wrote: Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from \override Stem #'length to \override Stem.length I would like to know in which LilyPond version this appeared. Somehow I don't seem to be able to think of the right search terms to locate the commit(s

Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread Noeck
Hi Urs, why not just test it? It works for 2.17.9 so it should with .10, too: \version "2.17.9" { \override Stem.length = #30 a } Cheers, Joram Am 23.01.2014 10:40, schrieb Urs Liska: > Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from > > \override Stem #'length > to > \override Stem.len

Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread David Kastrup
Peter Bjuhr writes: > On 01/23/2014 10:40 AM, Urs Liska wrote: >> Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from >> >> \override Stem #'length >> to >> \override Stem.length >> >> I would like to know in which LilyPond version this appeared. >> Somehow I don't seem to be able to think of the

Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.01.2014 10:52, schrieb Noeck: Hi Urs, why not just test it? It works for 2.17.9 so it should with .10, too: \version "2.17.9" { \override Stem.length = #30 a } Cheers, Joram Maybe I'm somewhat selfish, but I only have 2.17.3 and 2.17.96 still present, and I thought asking here wo

Re: [SPAM] Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.01.2014 10:47, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from \override Stem #'length to \override Stem.length I would like to know in which LilyPond version this appeared. 2.17.6, http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2883>

Re: [SPAM] Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.01.2014 10:50, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Somewhere in 2.17. David introduced the change from \override Stem #'length to \override Stem.length I would like to know in which LilyPond version this appeared. Somehow I don't seem to be able to think of the right search terms

Re: When was dot notation for dotted property paths added?

2014-01-23 Thread Peter Bjuhr
On 01/23/2014 10:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Peter Bjuhr writes: Could it be this: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=680df85187d0f3862b1ef1cf7a14f8ad7b7f0ee9;hp=ee89ee2c8ee328ec261b822aa9e260c9d623c086 No. Sorry! Probably followed an old link! Best Peter

Re: 64-bit font problems in GUB

2014-01-23 Thread Simon Bailey
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Simon Bailey" <...SNIP SNAP...> >> This leads me to conclude that there seems to be a problem with the >> 64-bit version of the font libraries in the build system for the >> release packages. Can anyone com

Hatches

2014-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Hi, I never worked with that kind of stuff, so I'd like to get some feedback and hints _before_ digging into the docs myself. So I explicitly don't expect ready solutions, just a few comments if my approach would be right. I'm looking for a way to typeset hatched cancellations in manuscripts

Re: [SPAM] Re: Non-standard notation challenges (no game this time...)

2014-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.01.2014 10:39, schrieb Phil Holmes: > The problem I would have when presented with this music is that I would have no idea - not a clue - about what the writer of the music intended with this notation. Is it explained anywhere? Without that, it seems rather pointless to try to reproduce i

Re: Shape of individual ties in chords

2014-01-23 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi, On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > Below some coding just to show that it can be done. > It's a very first sketch, several issues are present (p.e. linebreak) > Might be a starting point, though. > > There's also the attached file (which comes from http://www.mail-archi

Re: Shape of individual ties in chords

2014-01-23 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi again, On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:01 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi, > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Thomas Morley > wrote: > > >> Below some coding just to show that it can be done. >> It's a very first sketch, several issues are present (p.e. linebreak) >> Might be a starting point,

Re: frescobaldi macports broken after update

2014-01-23 Thread Davide Liessi
2014/1/18 Davide Liessi : > I'll let you know when the patch will be commited. The patch is now in MacPorts. Enter in the Terminal sudo port selfupdate sudo port upgrade outdated and you'll get a working Poppler installation and a working Music View in Frescobaldi. Best wishes. Davide _

Re: bar-check warning when generating rehearsal midi soprano, alto, tenor etc

2014-01-23 Thread MING TSANG
1- I now put spaces to the .ly code 2- my original score has 129 measures; I thought cut it down to 24 will show the warning barcheck error -- now I cut it down to 13 3-  I updated S1*0\f  with <>\f and I still have the same barcheck warning. Here is the updated test-midi.ly Starting lilypond-win

Re: frescobaldi macports broken after update

2014-01-23 Thread Stan Sanderson
Davide, Once again, many thanks for your support of Frescobaldi through MacPorts. Stan > On Jan 23, 2014, at 6:35 AM, Davide Liessi wrote: > > 2014/1/18 Davide Liessi : >> I'll let you know when the patch will be commited. > > The patch is now in MacPorts. > Enter in the Terminal > > sudo po

Re: [SPAM] Re: Non-standard notation challenges (no game this time...)

2014-01-23 Thread Keith OHara
Urs Liska openlilylib.org> writes: > The point in the edition of such snippets is to _document_ the actual > state of a manuscript. This isn't _music_ but rather a remainder from > the compositional process. Comparing this with later states allows an > editor to draw conclusions on the genesis

ekmelily- support fo microtonal notation in lilypond

2014-01-23 Thread Stefan Thomas
Daer community, for those who are interested in microtonal music and its notation: You should have look at http://www.ekmelic-music.org/en/ekmelily.htm it supports microtonal music notation in Lilypond. It also works with Linux (I've tested it) and it runs with Lilypond 2.18.! Stefan __

Re: bar-check warning when generating rehearsal midi soprano, alto, tenor etc

2014-01-23 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Hi MING TSANG, I think, there is just a typo. You give \sopranoVoiceI as last argument lyrics to the rehaersalMidi function. But that is the melody. \verseSopranoVoiceI are the lyrics. I changed that and the barcheck erros disappeared. HTH Jan-Peter On 23.01.2014 16:08, MING TSANG wrote: > 1- I

Re: Non-standard notation challenges (no game this time...)

2014-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.01.2014 16:56, schrieb Keith OHara: Urs Liska openlilylib.org> writes: The point in the edition of such snippets is to _document_ the actual state of a manuscript. This isn't _music_ but rather a remainder from the compositional process. Comparing this with later states allows an editor

Re: Shape of individual ties in chords

2014-01-23 Thread David Nalesnik
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:01 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > >> >>> >> There's also the attached file (which comes from >> http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-devel@gnu.org/msg47432/shape-tie-columns.ly) >> which will work with broken ties. >> >> > Here are some more useful values: \shapeTieColumn #

Fw: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 134, Issue 154

2014-01-23 Thread MING TSANG
  4. Re:bar-check warning when generating rehearsal midi soprano,       alto,    tenor etc (Jan-Peter Voigt) Message: 4 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:58:33 +0100 From: Jan-Peter Voigt To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: bar-check warning when generating rehearsal midi soprano,     alto,   

\set Score.midiPanPosition

2014-01-23 Thread Jim Long
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:09:38PM +1100, Vaughan McAlley wrote: > On 20 January 2014 07:09, Colin Campbell wrote: > > \set Score.midiPanPosition = #RIGHT > > \set Staff.midiPanPosition = #LEFT > > This is missing in the 2.18 changes, so I didn???t know about it until > now. Very nice! Strictl

Re: \set Score.midiPanPosition

2014-01-23 Thread Vaughan McAlley
On 24 January 2014 14:06, Jim Long wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:09:38PM +1100, Vaughan McAlley wrote: >> On 20 January 2014 07:09, Colin Campbell wrote: >> > \set Score.midiPanPosition = #RIGHT >> > \set Staff.midiPanPosition = #LEFT >> >> This is missing in the 2.18 changes, so I didn??

Re: frescobaldi macports broken after update

2014-01-23 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2014-01-23 um 20:35 schrieb Davide Liessi : > The patch is now in MacPorts. Great, it works again! Thank you (all of you) very much! I have two little complaints with Frescobaldi on OSX, that didn’t change in all the versions I tried: - If I start the program by opening a .ly file, Fresco