On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:05:49AM -0400, Carl Peterson wrote:
>
> These are along the lines of what I was thinking of. I don't have any
> experience with C. My programming experience as of late is in PHP. So I
> gave some thought last night to using it to read the files and trace the
> \include de
It would be helpful if I could print directly from Frescobaldi (set up using
Davide Liessi's instructions). While the standard print dialog appears, when
print is pressed the message, "cannot connect to the printer" appears. Helpful
suggestions appreciated!
Thanks,
Stan
___
Dear Keiren, I think I understand much better what pushToTag does.
What I would like to know:
Who can I get Bar-Rests instead of spacer-rests for the length of intro
verse and bridge?
2013/9/10 Kieren MacMillan
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks! That does the trick.
>
> Below is the snippet as I was envis
Hello,
2013/9/12 Hilary Snaden
> Is there a way of generating different midi outputs from a single
> Lilypond script, similar to using \book with \bookOutputName?
>
>
You can have different "score" block for layout and midi. For every score
with midi you will get different midi file:
score {<<
Hi Stefan,
> What I would like to know:
> Who can I get Bar-Rests instead of spacer-rests for the length of intro verse
> and bridge?
This sounds like a job for a music function (applied on the global variable)!
=)
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
lilyp
Op Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:16:21 +0200
Jacques Menu schreef:
> Thanks for everything, both frescobaldi and frescobaldi-devel work
> fine now!
Thanks to all people involved to make Frescobaldi on Mac OS X working!
Best!
Wilbert
--
Wilbert Berendsen
(http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl)
__
All,
I just installed LilyPond on a new laptop (same OS -- Windows 7 -- as
before), but this time the registry entry
HKCR\Python\shell\open\command\(Default), which is set to C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\python.exe , interferes with my path to my
Python installation in C:\Python27.
There
Which LilyPond version?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Bartlett
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:32 PM
Subject: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond
All,
I just installed LilyPond on a new laptop (same OS -- Window
Oh, sorry! 2.16.2
I have since found that I can run python scripts from the command line by
typing, say,
python myscript.py
While just typing
myscript
produces an error, even though the Windows file association has been set to
c:\Python27\python.exe.
This seems, if anything, weirder than my
Thanks goes also to Wilbert Berendsen for creating Frescobaldi.
As a Frescobaldi learning exercise, I encoded two pieces by J. F. Froberger -
Ricereare I and Capriccio XV - a total of 20,018 keystrokes. Frescobaldi cut
the time required at least by half, and I'm sure there are many shortcuts wh
I believe it allows you to type progname.py at the command line, and have
LilyPond's python run the script.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Bartlett
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: Wind
Because if that registry entry is not added and the user has no other python,
then they would not be able to run LilyPond's python scripts.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Bartlett
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 12,
Well, yes ... but why would I want LilyPond's python to run a script
instead of the system's python?
Perhaps I'm just not advanced enough a LilyPond user
Fred
On 12 September 2013 10:22, Phil Holmes wrote:
> **
> I believe it allows you to type progname.py at the command line, and have
>
Carl Peterson writes:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Tim Roberts writes:
>>
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> >> How does it make it harder? As I said, replying to a digest makes no
>> >> sense with regard to message threading anyway.
>> >
>> > Of course it makes sens
Hi all,
> I have no idea how your email system would figure out just what mail Tim
> had been replying to. The information is just not there in the headers.
Apple Mail uses the Subject (as text), and I imagine there are other
applications that do the same.
This of course leads to any number of
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > I have no idea how your email system would figure out just what mail Tim
> > had been replying to. The information is just not there in the headers.
>
> Apple Mail uses the Subject (as text),
David Kastrup wrote:
> How does it make it harder? As I said, replying to a digest makes no
> sense with regard to message threading anyway.
Of course it makes sense. I just did it, and your mailer is almost
certainly showing you the proper threading, isn't it?
--
Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Tim Roberts writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> >> How does it make it harder? As I said, replying to a digest makes no
> >> sense with regard to message threading anyway.
> >
> > Of course it makes sense. I just did it, and your mailer
Tim Roberts writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>> How does it make it harder? As I said, replying to a digest makes no
>> sense with regard to message threading anyway.
>
> Of course it makes sense. I just did it, and your mailer is almost
> certainly showing you the proper threading, isn't it?
N
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi all,
>
>> I have no idea how your email system would figure out just what mail Tim
>> had been replying to. The information is just not there in the headers.
>
> Apple Mail uses the Subject (as text), and I imagine there are other
> applications that do the same.
O
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> I'm certain Gmail will also be able to figure out the mail you are
> replying to without referring to any header at all as long as any Gmail
> user has not yet deleted it (and probably even afterwards). But for a
> normal mail server/clie
Carl Peterson writes:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Kieren MacMillan <
> kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> > I have no idea how your email system would figure out just what
>> > mail Tim had been replying to. The information is just not there
>> > in the headers.
>>
>> Apple Mail u
Frederick Bartlett wrote:
>
>
> Oh, sorry! 2.16.2
>
> I have since found that I can run python scripts from the command line
> by typing, say,
> python myscript.py
>
> While just typing
> myscript
> produces an error, even though the Windows file association has been
> set to c:\Python27\pytho
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:48 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Not sure about that. The information usually is available in the
> headers, and as far as I can tell, Gmail does preserve and maintain it
> as well. So unless someone "breaks the chain", it would seem like a
> poor choice not to actually u
Carl Peterson writes:
> This is a question of whether it makes sense from the human side or
> the computer side. From the computer side, certainly. However, adding
> a reply-to target doesn't fix that. If someone's going to reply from
> the digest, they're going to reply from the digest.
You wou
Carl Peterson writes:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm certain Gmail will also be able to figure out the mail you are
>> replying to without referring to any header at all as long as any Gmail
>> user has not yet deleted it (and probably even afterwards). But
At 14:50 12/09/2013 -0500, Evan Driscoll wrote:
Now, that being said and because I'm sure no one cares, IMO the way
the Lilypond list is set up ("reply" goes to the sender) is
*absolutely* the correct way to run a mailing list, and the
alternative is completely maddening.
It's not just your o
David Kastrup writes:
> As I said, replies from a digest rarely make sense because of breaking
> the message threading.
This is true, or at least I'm willing to take it as true - but if a
digest exists, then it would be very strange and frustrating to try to
disallow replying to it. Otherwise, i
The main reason I'm responding to this is to point out that if you use
digests, it's possible to configure it so that it sends each message as
an attachment instead of just dumping them all into the message body.
If you see something you want to respond to, you can just open up the
corresponding a
Evan Driscoll writes:
> I definitely pay attention to who I keep on the CC list and will
> remove people if I have reason to believe the followup is a lot less
> relevant for them, but that's my general rule of thumb. Maybe it's
> just because I don't get enough emails, but I get *way* more annoy
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Evan Driscoll wrote:
> On 9/12/2013 2:03 PM, Carl Peterson wrote:
> > It also discourages the delightful idiots who insist on replying all
> > to a mass mailing (when the original sender didn't have the decency or
> > know-how to stick the recipient names in the b
David Rogers writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> As I said, replies from a digest rarely make sense because of breaking
>> the message threading.
>
> This is true, or at least I'm willing to take it as true - but if a
> digest exists, then it would be very strange and frustrating to try to
> di
- Original Message -
From: "David Rogers"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: mea máxima culpa
David Kastrup writes:
As I said, replies from a digest rarely make sense because of breaking
the message threading.
This is true, or at lea
A PDF portfolio of the Extending, Internals, Learning, Notation,
Snippets, Usage, and Web manuals is available at
https://www.dropbox.com/s/s1oqbioxvu8630y/lilydoc-2.17.26.pdf (53MB)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.g
Hilary Snaden writes:
> Nearly two years ago I wrote to this list commenting about major
> problems (including registry residue) resulting from trying to run
> Python 2, Python 3 and Lilypond on the same Windoze box.
>
> Since switching to GNU/Linux they've all got on just fine. Switching
> to GN
On 2013-09-12 14:32, Frederick Bartlett wrote:
> All,
>
> I just installed LilyPond on a new laptop (same OS -- Windows 7 -- as
> before), but this time the registry entry
> HKCR\Python\shell\open\command\(Default), which is set to C:\Program
> Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\python.exe , interferes wi
On 12/09/13 07:25, Hilary Snaden wrote:
> Is there a way of generating different midi outputs from a single
> Lilypond script, similar to using \book with \bookOutputName?
>
Issue 1354
Cheers Ian
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
h
Hilary Snaden wrote
> On 2013-09-12 14:32, Frederick Bartlett wrote:
>
>> There seem to have been problems regarding the registry in the past, but
>> not exactly like the one I've encountered ... does anyone have handy info
>> on how to convince Windows to let LilyPond run its own python while
>>
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> Well yes, a thread is logically a _tree_. A chronological sort only
> renders a list, and that's just not useful for tracking a particular
> conversation to its start.
FWIW, I receive the digest and when I want to reply to a message, I use gmane.
It's slightly
Hi all -
About a year ago, several of you answered questions of mine about notating a
film score. I reached a stopping point with the first cue and learned a bit
more about git, so I have the first film cue from the score up on github now:
https://github.com/tunesmith/TheForgivingSea
(pdf of
Well, Microsoft has invented the side-by-side (SxS) installation years
ago. I has been introduced for Windows XP.
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa376307.aspx)
Although the name "assembly" suggests that it has to do with .NET CLR
it is a plain DLL thing suitable for native C applications
41 matches
Mail list logo
