Lilypond only has four
built in voices. If you need more, you must define them yourself. That
is the purpose of the voiceFive line.
Andrew
Mark Stephen Mrotek
18 August 2013
4:55 PM
Hello: The attached snippet, commands.ly, is fromhttp://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Docume
Has no effect as far as I
can see.
Andrew
Mark Stephen Mrotek
18 August 2013
4:55 PM
The attached
snippet, commands.ly, is fromhttp://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices.html.
2. What is the
purpose/effect of the command \bar "||" b
2013/8/18 Mark Stephen Mrotek
> Hello:
>
> **
>
Hi,
> **2. **What is the purpose/effect of the command \bar "||" before
> voiceTwo?
>
Looks like a copy/paste mistake.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
Hi Mark
This snippet is rather contrived and misleading. I think it should be removed
from the docs, or at least replaced with one which shows when the definition of
voiceFive is really necessary - when explicitly defining voices.
First, the \voicexxx commands are unnecessary when using the <<
Andrew:
Thank you for your reply and the explanation. Hopefully I shall never need
more than four voices.
Mark
From: Andrew Bernard [mailto:andrew.bern...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 12:01 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: purpose of command
No mistake. It is exactly as it appears in the manual.
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider [mailto:pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 12:48 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: purpose of commands
2013/8/18 Mark Stephen Mrotek
Hello:
Hi,
2.
Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote
> No mistake. It is exactly as it appears in the manual.
not your mistake, rather the documenter's or developer's
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/purpose-of-commands-tp149365p149372.html
Sent from the User mailing list arc
Eluze:
Thank you.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Eluze
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 1:27 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: purpose of commands
Mark Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Mark Stephen Mrotek" ;
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: purpose of commands
Hi Mark
This snippet is rather contrived and misleading. I think it should be
removed from the docs, or at least replaced with one which s
Hi Tommaso,
2013/8/18 Tommaso Gordini :
> Thank you, Thomas!
please always reply to all!
> Unfortunately, I get an error: it could be due to the version of LilyPond
> that I use (2.16.2)?
Yep.
My use of define-scheme-function within fingerChart doesn't work with
2.16.2 this way.
Try to replace
Trevor:
Thanks for helping me over the learning curve.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 12:48 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: purpose of commands
Hi Mark
This snippet is rather cont
Phil Holmes,
Thanks for your work on the manual. I learn a lot from it and that which I
do not understand the other users help me!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 1:49 AM
To: Trevor Daniels; Mark Stephen Mrotek; lilyp
Phil, you wrote Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:49 AM
> From: "Trevor Daniels"
> Sunday, August 18, 2013 8:48 AM
>> This snippet is rather contrived and misleading. I think it should be
>> removed from the docs, or at least replaced with one which shows when the
>> definition of voiceFive is reall
2013/8/18 Pierre Perol-Schneider :
> 2013/8/17 Thomas Morley
>>
>>
>> > 2) property setting music objs. in music-functions.scm
>>
>> Here I don't understand.
>> Could you c/p what you did?
>
>
> OK.
> In LilyPond scm files, there is one named music-functions.scm.
> If you open it, at the end of th
Hi Schemers,
2013/7/24 Nicolas Sceaux :
> Le 24 juil. 2013 à 01:09, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>> In a few hours (after sleep) I'll start my vacations, being offline
>> for three weeks.
>> Perhaps someone else might catch the ball.
>
> Hi,
> Here is a proposition, with probably still room for improv
"Janek Warchoł" schrieb:
>Hi Schemers,
>
>2013/7/24 Nicolas Sceaux :
>> Le 24 juil. 2013 à 01:09, Thomas Morley a
>écrit :
>>> In a few hours (after sleep) I'll start my vacations, being offline
>>> for three weeks.
>>> Perhaps someone else might catch the ball.
>>
>> Hi,
>> Here is a propos
Hello everybody,
I want a line break in the middle of a measure and start a repeat on the
next line.
I tried
> fis4 b a
> \bar"" \break \bar"|:"
> \repeat ...
but Lilypond is putting a \bar"|" at the end of the first line while I
need a \bar"".
Any suggestions?
Thanks a lot in advance
Hartmut
-
"Janek Warchoł" schrieb:
>Hi Schemers,
>
>2013/7/24 Nicolas Sceaux :
>> Le 24 juil. 2013 à 01:09, Thomas Morley a
>écrit :
>>> In a few hours (after sleep) I'll start my vacations, being offline
>>> for three weeks.
>>> Perhaps someone else might catch the ball.
>>
>> Hi,
>> Here is a propos
2013/8/18 Hartmut Leister :
> Hello everybody,
>
> I want a line break in the middle of a measure and start a repeat on the
> next line.
> I tried
>> fis4 b a
>> \bar"" \break \bar"|:"
>> \repeat ...
> but Lilypond is putting a \bar"|" at the end of the first line while I
> need a \bar"".
>
> Any s
Thank you, now everything works perfectly!
I still have three demands.
1. It is possible to center the whole notes in the bar?
2. It is possible to determine the distance of the first row of numbers
from the first line of the pentagram? I wish that all the numbers were in
line below the staff. F
Zitat von Janek Warchoł :
Hi folks,
2013/8/9 Urs Liska :
Hi all,
although I suspect this could once more become a longish and scattered
thread, I feel forced to bring it up here.
What do you think: would it make sense to open up LilyPond thinking to the
idea of SMuFL brought up by Steinberg
Hi,
2013/8/18 :
>
> Zitat von Janek Warchoł :
>> We don't know if it would be worth it to make LilyPond support SMuFL.
>> But i think the question is: what should we do to make it easier to us
>> to adopt SMuFL if we decide to to do in the future?
>> In other words, how can we influence SMuFL des
Hi,
2013/8/17 Janek Warchoł :
>
> 2013/8/14 Thomas Morley :
>> The right place for them would be the LSR, _if_ the LSR would be able
>> to compile them and not use a LilyPond-version far too old for many of
>> my ideas.
>>
>> There were some insinuations on the list the last months (or was it a
>>
Here's the problem:
I would like to format for a refrain at the beginning of a hymn.
I'm unsure of the manuals (both snippet and notation) when it comes to
this, because it doesn't show 4 part harmony (independent voices) in the
examples. I'm not sure what to do.
Here's the parsing error message
My approach to handling parts for hymn settings is to define the music for
the verses and chorus independently and then apply nested simultaneous and
sequential voices. So, for instance,
\score { <<
\new Staff = "top" {
<< \new Voice = "sopRef" { \sopRefrainNotes } \new Voice = "altRef" {
This is so wonderful, and a great step forward. However, I need some
guidance here:
I may be stuck in trying to adjust the score to fit these parameters. Could
you provide a short example?
Do you have a template for use?
Thank you so much for your time. This is incredibly helpful.
On Sun, Aug 1
Joshua Nichols writes:
> Here's the problem:
>
> I would like to format for a refrain at the beginning of a hymn.
>
> I'm unsure of the manuals (both snippet and notation) when it comes to
> this, because it doesn't show 4 part harmony (independent voices) in the
> examples. I'm not sure what to
In my data entry, I found my output coming out screwey... So I went back
and double/triple/quadruple checked for mistakes, trying to get this thing
to work... and I might have encountered a bug.
Here's the original file:
\version "2.16.2"
#(set! paper-alist (cons '("Hymn" . (cons (* 6.25 in) (* 9
On 13-08-18 11:09 PM, Joshua Nichols wrote:
In my data entry, I found my output coming out screwey... So I went
back and double/triple/quadruple checked for mistakes, trying to get
this thing to work... and I might have encountered a bug.
the error occurs (try expediting first) at the beginnin
29 matches
Mail list logo
