Running Lilypond 2.16.0 -
1. In the following 8 bar snippet, I am arpeggiating across the middle
and upper voices. The arpeggio is colliding with the rest that's in the
middle voice. I've tried about 9 ways and I cannot get the arpeggio in
the right place. It needs to make room for that rest.
Am 22.05.2013 08:59, schrieb Tom Cloyd:
Running Lilypond 2.16.0 -
1. In the following 8 bar snippet, I am arpeggiating across the middle
and upper voices. The arpeggio is colliding with the rest that's in the
middle voice. I've tried about 9 ways and I cannot get the arpeggio in
the right place.
Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 22.05.2013 08:59, schrieb Tom Cloyd:
>> Running Lilypond 2.16.0 -
>>
>> 1. In the following 8 bar snippet, I am arpeggiating across the middle
>> and upper voices. The arpeggio is colliding with the rest that's in the
>> middle voice. I've tried about 9 ways and I cannot ge
On 22 May 2013, at 10:06 , David Kastrup wrote:
It's just a matter of efficiency. To find the problem, you need to
boil
down the code to the essential part anyway. Not doing this in advance
is only efficient if the expected number of helpers is below 1 or if
their time is to be valued less
Dear Helge,
Helge Kruse wrote:
No. I think you misspelled MS with a special character '$' and I can
find any reason for that. Is this intentionally or really a typo?
Let's not be cynical about this: It was fully intentional, but could arguably be described as a
somewhat adolescent and dated
Hi all,
David Kastrup wrote:
[...] it is hard to find Florian at fault for since he is working with
the terminology employed by LilyPond.
luis jure wrote:
[...] the inconsistent use of the terms "note" and "pitch" in
florian's presentation (which, as you said, was just the consequence of
usi
Hi folks,
I seem to have run into a problem that has been reported once before:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-03/msg00263.html
Consider this file:
%%%
\version "2.16.2"
First={f'2\bendAfter #-5 }
Second={d'2\bendAfter #-5 }
\score{
<<
\
Hi
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:41 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> Here's another version which will automatically find the longest syllable.
> You can tag any one of the lyric syllables at a given timestep.
>
>
Noticed a problem. Corrected file attached.
--David
lyrics-alignment2.
In this excerpt from a piece I'm typesetting, the first two arpeggios are
fine, but the third collides with the previous note in the right hand's
upper voice. Is there a way to avoid the collision?
\version "2.16.2"
global = {
\key as \major
\time 6/8
}
rightOne = \relative c'' {
\global
I'm not in a position to test this at the moment, but just for
confirmation, will this work with an arbitrary number of tagged syllables
through a Lyrics context?
ex:
tagIt = \once \override Lyrics.LyricText #'tagged = ##t
\new Lyrics \lyricsto A {
\tagIt This is the first phrase in my so
Hi Carl,
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Carl Peterson wrote:
> I'm not in a position to test this at the moment, but just for
> confirmation, will this work with an arbitrary number of tagged syllables
> through a Lyrics context?
>
> ex:
>
> tagIt = \once \override Lyrics.LyricText #'tagged =
David,
Thanks. Hardly worth the effort! I think I'll just try to ignore my allergy to
leading zeroes in dates. Or not do any engraving 1-9 of the month.
I'm no LISP expert, apart from knowing that it stands for Lots of Irritating
Surplus Parentheses.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.
Peter,
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Peter Toye wrote:
> David,
>
> Thanks. Hardly worth the effort! I think I'll just try to ignore my
> allergy to leading zeroes in dates. Or not do any engraving 1-9 of the
> month.
>
But the work is done--all you need to do is copy and paste what I've
Well, comparing the lengths of strings is a bit shortsighted, as all
four-letter words don't occupy the same space... Revised to work with
stencil sizes, as David Kastrup suggests earlier in this thread.
Argh.
lyrics-alignment2.ly
Description: Binary data
___
Michael Rivers wrote
> In this excerpt from a piece I'm typesetting, the first two arpeggios are
> fine, but the third collides with the previous note in the right hand's
> upper voice. Is there a way to avoid the collision?
if you search for /generalized-offsetter/ in this list you'll find a nic
Michael Rivers gmail.com> writes:
> In this excerpt from a piece I'm typesetting, the first two arpeggios are
> fine, but the third collides with the previous note in the right hand's
> upper voice. Is there a way to avoid the collision?
>
When you need more space between notes, you can use ext
2013/5/22 Florian Hollerweger
> Let's not be cynical about this: It was fully intentional,
>
Sorry to sound cynical. Now I looked up the M$ thingy in urbandictionary. I
wasn't aware of this, just thougt it was a typo.
I am starting to find this discussion rather entertaining :)
>
At least better
Hi,
Helge Kruse wrote:
Sorry to sound cynical. Now I looked up the M$ thingy in
urbandictionary. I wasn't aware of this, just thougt it was a typo.
Oh, wow, I guess now I'm the one to appear cynical :)
I didn't think about problems with the slides. I just added ideas to
improve this Lilypon
Dear All,
Greetings from Jakarta, Indonesia. This is the first time I post to the
list. I would like to typeset the chants here (as presented in The Hymnal
1982 of ECUSA):
https://www.riteseries.org/low_res/S/S109/S109_watermark.gif
I've succeeded in removing the staff lines, adding the \divisio
19 matches
Mail list logo
