Re: vibrato squiggle

2012-06-20 Thread Orm Finnendahl
Am Mittwoch, den 20. Juni 2012 um 08:46:33 Uhr (+0200) schrieb m...@apollinemike.com: > > If you google "vibster lilypond", there used to be a snippet for 2.12 that > did something like this. I'm not sure if it works in 2.14. doesn't seem to work here: GNU LilyPond 2.14.2 Processing `/tmp/con

"-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread James Harkins
I just encountered something curious while trying to get a list of fonts on my machine from lilypond. According to the documentation of font selection: lilypond -dshow-available-fonts x This does indeed list of fonts, but the terminal doesn't keep enough lines to see the entire list. So I thoug

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread -Eluze
James Harkins-2 wrote: > > I just encountered something curious while trying to get a list of fonts > on my machine from lilypond. According to the documentation of font > selection: > > > > it goes to stderr - so you have to use (according to http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/usa

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread James Harkins
On 6/20/12, Ramana Kumar wrote: > probably lilypond isn't writing to stdout. maybe stderr? OK, let me refine the question. If it isn't using stdout, is there a good reason why is it using something else? Or is it just a bug? hjh -- James Harkins /// dewdrop world jamshar...@dewdrop-world.net

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread Mark Knoop
At 16:20 on 20 Jun 2012, James Harkins wrote: >I just encountered something curious while trying to get a list of >fonts on my machine from lilypond. According to the documentation of >font selection: > >lilypond -dshow-available-fonts x > >This does indeed list of fonts, but the terminal doesn't k

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "James Harkins" To: "lily-users" Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:36 AM Subject: Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout? On 6/20/12, Ramana Kumar wrote: probably lilypond isn't writing to stdout. maybe stderr? OK, let me refine the question. If it

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "James Harkins" > To: "lily-users" > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:36 AM > Subject: Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout? > > >> On 6/20/12, Ramana Kumar wrote: >>> probably lilypond isn't writing to stdout. maybe stderr?

Re: vibrato squiggle

2012-06-20 Thread Janek Warchoł
Mike, On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:46 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > If you know how to write Scheme code, it'd take about a day to code a clean > version of this.  I can give you a hand w/ design stuff if you need it. Didn't you use such squiggly lines in "granini di luce beccucciati da uccel

Re: vibrato squiggle

2012-06-20 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On 20 juin 2012, at 12:29, Janek Warchoł wrote: > Mike, > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:46 AM, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: >> If you know how to write Scheme code, it'd take about a day to code a clean >> version of this. I can give you a hand w/ design stuff if you need it. > > Didn't you u

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread Ramana Kumar
FWIW I agree that -dshow--available-fonts should write to stdout. Is it typical to use that argument with any other arguments or an input file? (Maybe that should also be disallowed.) On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:38 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > > - Original Message ---

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:38 AM Subject: Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout? "Phil Holmes" writes: - Original Message - From: "James Harkins" To: "lily-users" Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:36 AM Subject

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread Tim Roberts
Ramana Kumar wrote: > FWIW I agree that -dshow--available-fonts should write to stdout. Before this goes much further, please realize that this is a matter of opinion. There is no unambiguously correct answer to this issue. The fact is that lilypond writes the output to stderr, and that's the wa

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread David Kastrup
Tim Roberts writes: > Ramana Kumar wrote: >> FWIW I agree that -dshow--available-fonts should write to stdout. > > Before this goes much further, please realize that this is a matter of > opinion. There is no unambiguously correct answer to this issue. The > fact is that lilypond writes the out

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread andersvi
Use &> to redirect both stderr and stdout where you want it. Great in any case where you're not too sure which std*** pipe youre looking for, or dont care... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/li

forcing two pages

2012-06-20 Thread Fidler Aoileann
Hello, The music I have written has one page and one line of music. The first page seems very busy and squashed to me so I'd likeit to be spread out over the two pages. Can anyone help? Many thanks Aoileann___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread Ramana Kumar
probably lilypond isn't writing to stdout. maybe stderr? On Jun 20, 2012 9:20 AM, "James Harkins" wrote: > I just encountered something curious while trying to get a list of fonts > on my machine from lilypond. According to the documentation of font > selection: > > lilypond -dshow-available-font

Re: forcing two pages

2012-06-20 Thread Ramana Kumar
Have you read the Manual, for example http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/changing-spacing? I think one option for you would be to play with the "ragged-bottom" paper block option, or maybe the \noPageBreak command. On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Fidler Aoileann wrote: > Hello,

utility to create files for a score or book

2012-06-20 Thread -Eluze
utility to create files for a score or book I'd like to typeset a piece with 6 parts for 2 guitars - each guitar can have 3 voices with left/right hand fingerings, dynamics and maybe more (eg. string indications) which I'm used to write in separate files. this requires a lot of files: 6 x 2 x

Re: utility to create files for a score or book

2012-06-20 Thread Federico Bruni
Il 20/06/2012 22:10, -Eluze ha scritto: now my question: does anybody know a tool/utility which would create all these files and maybe even write the corresponding code into them. do you know the make example in Usage? http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/usage/make-and-makefiles it's n

Re: utility to create files for a score or book

2012-06-20 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On 20 juin 2012, at 22:10, -Eluze wrote: > > utility to create files for a score or book > > I'd like to typeset a piece with 6 parts for 2 guitars - each guitar can > have 3 voices with left/right hand fingerings, dynamics and maybe more (eg. > string indications) which I'm used to write in se

Reverse Lilypond Book...

2012-06-20 Thread Sami
Hi all! This has probably been asked before, but I haven't found it anywhere, so I ask it myself. Excuse any repetition, and please direct me there if it exists and you can find it easily. With lilypond-book and co, what I understood is that one writes a LaTeX document with lilypond snippets. Es

Re: forcing two pages

2012-06-20 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 19.06.2012 20:10, schrieb Fidler Aoileann: Hello, The music I have written has one page and one line of music. The first page seems very busy and squashed to me so I'd likeit to be spread out over the two pages. Can anyone help? Many thanks Aoileann Last time I wanted to spread the notes a

Re: "-dshow-available-fonts" vs. UNIX stdout?

2012-06-20 Thread James Harkins
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:26:10 -0700 From: Tim Roberts > Most folks with Unix command-line experience, when noticing that the > output wasn't caught in stdout, would automatically try stderr (2>) next. Thanks for the helpful suggestions. In fact, my UNIX commandline chops are mediocre at best.

Re: Reverse Lilypond Book...

2012-06-20 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 21.06.2012 01:50, schrieb Sami: Hi all! This has probably been asked before, but I haven't found it anywhere, so I ask it myself. Excuse any repetition, and please direct me there if it exists and you can find it easily. With lilypond-book and co, what I understood is that one writes a LaTeX

Re: Reverse Lilypond Book...

2012-06-20 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On 21 juin 2012, at 01:50, Sami wrote: > > Hi all! > > This has probably been asked before, but I haven't found it anywhere, so I > ask it myself. Excuse any repetition, and please direct me there if it > exists and you can find it easily. > > With lilypond-book and co, what I understood is tha