Hi Jay,
Thanks for the link. I'l look into it, but am practically sure that I
won't be able to fix anything. As mentioned I don't have any experience
with Scheme.
Best
Urs
BTW: The current piece not only has plenty of octaves (one voice is
virtually octaves-only), but each octave has a -. a
Hello Urs,
the articulations are were copied to the EventChord - so I added copying
the articulations from NoteEvent to EventChord.
That means, they should not stay in the NoteEvents when getting wrapped
into the EventChord:
--snip--
\version "2.15.36"
#(define (with-octave-up m octave)
> I am not topposting
Let's see whether bypassing Gmane gets us into the discussion any
faster.
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hello Urs,
>
> the articulations are were copied to the EventChord - so I added
> copying the articulations from NoteEvent to EventChord.
> That means, they should not stay
Hello David,
thank you for implementing this stuff!
This is nice, but there are two things to mention:
1. with Urs' example, lily complains about Slurs it can't finish
2. if you try this tiny snippet, the chord is actually broken in
two notes and the slur is typed twice.
So how do you build re
-Eluze writes:
> lesmondo wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to separate bow marks/fingerings from notes and the bow
>> marks/fingerings don't align with the notes correctly.
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>>
> I don't understand why you are using fingerings and bows in both voices!?
It
David Kastrup did a quick fix a few months
back:http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-03/msg00114.html
I just tried it and it had a few problems:
- it didn't work within a relative section. It only worked within
relative sections before.
- Slurs and dynamics attached to single no
Hi.
Is there a way to remove page numbers in Lilypond v2.14.2?
Thanks to all.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Urs Liska writes:
> I was quite happy to find the function \makeOctaves in the LSR.
>
> But now it seems to be broken - there is no error message, but the
> function doesn't do anything (2.15.36).
> As I don't know _anything_ about Scheme I can't do more than ask if
> anybody has an idea what has
Urs Liska writes:
[...]
I recommend a healthy dose of cheating. The main non-triviality seems
to be dealing with relative music properly. Other than that it is just
<< \transpose c' c'' $xxx $xxx >> or similar. So let's treat the
problem at the root, with a to-relative-callback for the transp
> I am not top posting
Yes, this is a duplicate, but perhaps with the "not top posting"
stupidity it will actually arrive at the list before the discussion is
over. I apologize for whichever copy will arrive latest.
Urs Liska writes:
[...]
I recommend a healthy dose of cheating. The main no
On 4/18/12, Antonio Soler wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Is there a way to remove page numbers in Lilypond v2.14.2?
>
> Thanks to all.
>
Greetings,
This can be specified in the \paper block, placed at the head of your
file.
\paper {
print-page-number = ##f
}
Section 4.1 of the Notation Ref
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hello David,
>
> thank you for implementing this stuff!
> This is nice, but there are two things to mention:
> 1. with Urs' example, lily complains about Slurs it can't finish
Not really surprising since slurs start on two notes and finish on three
with the modified exa
David Kastrup writes:
> Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
>
>> Hello David,
>>
>> thank you for implementing this stuff!
>> This is nice, but there are two things to mention:
>> 1. with Urs' example, lily complains about Slurs it can't finish
>
> Not really surprising since slurs start on two notes and fi
-Eluze wrote:
> Tim Roberts wrote:
>> This is a hand-drawn score. I'm thinking that they probably meant snap
>> pizzicato, and it was easier to draw the line all the way through than
>> to stop part way through. Snap pizzicato would fit in the context, and
>> I have found no source that shows the
Hi all,
thank you very much for all these thoughts.
I'm so sorry that I don't understand a (Scheme) word from it ...
But judging from my programming experience in other languages David's
last solution looks _very_ elegant. And it seems to work, even with
still more complex chords and multiple a
just another observation:
While it worked smoothly with the last example, the function complains
when there are phrasingSlurs involved. I get a message saying a) (at the
beginning) that there already is a phrasingSlur and b) (at the end) that
the phrasingSlur can't be ended.
The result is corr
Urs Liska writes:
> just another observation:
> While it worked smoothly with the last example, the function complains
> when there are phrasingSlurs involved. I get a message saying a) (at
> the beginning) that there already is a phrasingSlur and b) (at the
> end) that the phrasingSlur can't be
Hello list,
I was very pleased to see that by now one can write footnotes quite easily.
Unfortunately I didn't find the property that controls the line
separating the footnote. from the score.
I would like to have the footnote either without any separator or with a
short, left-aligned line.
I
The documentation at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes
for both automatic and manual footnotes says that the \footnote command
must come *before* the grob to which the footnote is being attached.
This doesn't seem to be the case. Here the \footnote commands
Hello,
On 20 April 2012 00:40, Nick Payne wrote:
> The documentation at
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes for
> both automatic and manual footnotes says that the \footnote command must
> come *before* the grob to which the footnote is being attached. This d
On Apr 20, 2012, at 7:40 AM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 20 April 2012 00:40, Nick Payne wrote:
>> The documentation at
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes for
>> both automatic and manual footnotes says that the \footnote command must
>> come *before* the
21 matches
Mail list logo
