James Harkins-2 wrote:
>
> At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:29:14 +0800,
> James Harkins wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure somebody has had to do this before: place dynamics under a staff
>> so that all the dynamics in one system are the same distance below the
>> staff, but that distance can be different from one s
Hello Urs,
There are two possibilities:
1.: use a little music-function-helper:
--snip--
\version "2.15.36"
dbtime = #(define-music-function (parser location frac)(fraction?)
#{
\bar "||" \time $frac
#})
% example
\relative c' {
c4 e g b \dbtime 3/4 c des b | c2.
}
--snip--
but this m
Trevor Daniels wrote Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:55 PM
James Harkins wrote Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:08 PM
Still, it might be helpful to link to this page from some other places,
say, "Tweaking methods."
For instance,
~~~
The general syntax of this command is:
\override Context.LayoutO
Dear LilyPond-users, after hours of research I decided to ask you the
following:
- How do I add text which is aligned with certain barlines? This is quite
common for percussion notation to indicate which line represents which
(part of an) instrument. In my case: which part of a gong to strike.
*
Hello Jan-Peter and Tim,
thanks for your replies.
I would like to use this on sources I'm already working on.
So I don't need to use your include construct.
But I think I'll try out your Scheme engraver approach. If it doesn't
work or behave as I would like, then I'll go for entering the double
Thank you, Mattias, for showing me this workaround!
> You could also try to import the musicxml file into MuseScore: MuseScore is
> available for Linux, Windows and Mac. It does not only read musicxml, but
> midi as well. Plus: it exports in lilypond-format!
>
> I've had success in reading a music
Hi Jan-Peter,
thanks a lot, works perfectly!
Am 13.04.2012 11:49, schrieb Urs Liska:
Hello Jan-Peter and Tim,
thanks for your replies.
I would like to use this on sources I'm already working on.
So I don't need to use your include construct.
But I think I'll try out your Scheme engraver appro
Phil Holmes wrote
> Here's one way:
>
>\relative c'' {
> << { \override Rest #'staff-position = #0 d8 r d r d r d r } \\ { b8 s b
>s b s b s } >>
>r r r r
>}
This suggestion is fine for notes at those particular positions on the stave,
but for higher or lower notes, a different metho
Hello, I am new in Lilypond, because I need to include contemprary music
notation in my socres, but I can not find
any code or examples in the part concerning to Contemporary Music Notation:
It is the same in the PDF version
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/contemporary-music
Jonathan Wilkes writes:
> Well it's definitely a pain. My favorites are booleans, which require
> one hash to denote scheme code, and one hash for the boolean. (Why
> not one more hash, for good measure?)
The character "#" would be written as ##\# when accessed from LilyPond.
So what?
--
Dav
On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Sabina Covarrubias wrote:
>
>
> Hello, I am new in Lilypond, because I need to include contemprary music
> notation in my socres, but I can not find
> any code or examples in the part concerning to Contemporary Music Notation:
> It is the same in the PDF version
>
I've found some odd tie behavior--not sure if it's known currently.
Sorry, currently I can't test whether it also happens in earlier
versions.
The following code creates a "flying tie" situation around the upper
and lower notes of the chord, in other words the ties lie far outside
the staff. This
James
On 13 April 2012 16:30, James Worlton wrote:
> I've found some odd tie behavior--not sure if it's known currently.
> Sorry, currently I can't test whether it also happens in earlier
> versions.
>
> The following code creates a "flying tie" situation around the upper
> and lower notes of the
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, James wrote:
> James
>
> On 13 April 2012 16:30, James Worlton wrote:
>> I've found some odd tie behavior--not sure if it's known currently.
>> Sorry, currently I can't test whether it also happens in earlier
>> versions.
>>
>> The following code creates a "flyin
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jonathan Wilkes writes:
>
>> Well it's definitely a pain. My favorites are booleans, which require
>> one hash to denote scheme code, and one hash for the boolean. (Why
>> not one more hash, for good measure?)
>
> The character "#" would b
> > At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:29:14 +0800,
> > James Harkins wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm sure somebody has had to do this before: place dynamics under a staff
> >> so that all the dynamics in one system are the same distance below the
> >> staff, but that distance can be different from one system to the nex
16 matches
Mail list logo
