Am 21.12.2010 03:17, schrieb Graham Percival:
[...]
Excellent! How do we move forward and include this font?
btw are there any other nice fonts that we could include as well?
Somebody produces a patch, for lilypond git and/or GUB as
necessary, and we will examine it. There are no guarantees th
2011/1/19 Ben Luo :
> Dear All,
>
> Today I checked out lilypond web from
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=summary
>
> But it seems old. Is there any latest repo to pull?
The last (more recent) commit I see from your link is 15 hours old
now. It's the last commited change a
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:31:43PM +0800, Ben Luo wrote:
> Today I checked out lilypond web from
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=summary
>
> But it seems old. Is there any latest repo to pull?
The website is now built from the main source; the "web" branch is
obsolete.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:22:12AM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Am 21.12.2010 03:17, schrieb Graham Percival:
> >>Excellent! How do we move forward and include this font?
> >>btw are there any other nice fonts that we could include as well?
> >Somebody produces a patch, for lilypond git and/or GUB as
Thanks Ted, that works.
The one remaining problem is restoring the default behaviour of melimas
afterwards:
The "\once" trick doesn't work. I've also tried saving and restoring
the default value of melismaBusyProperties in a temporary variable but,
being ignorant of Scheme syntax, I just get
Ben
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ben
Luo
Sent: 19 January 2011 07:32
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Lilypond web git seems old
Dear All,
Today I checked out
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:11:50AM +, James Lowe wrote:
> [James Lowe] the last update was 17 hours ago (by me).
>
> Before that 2 more checkins were made in the last 2 days.
>
> So I am not sure what you mean by 'old'.
He's talking about the web branch, where the last "update" was 6
months
2011/1/19 Xavier Scheuer :
> 2011/1/18 Janek Warchoł
>>
>> It must have been this... Strangely it doesn't work for me. Even the
>> ordinary Point-and-click doesn't work, only "edit in place".
>
> Just to make sure, you need to use LilyPondTool's built-in "PDF Preview"
> in order to have this featu
2011/1/18 Marc Hohl :
> Am 18.01.2011 18:56, schrieb Graham Percival:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:24:11PM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
>>>
>>> These functions should be bundled in a snippet, or perhaps included in
>>> the
>>> lilypond distribution?
>>
>> Start by adding it to LSR.
>
> Done.
>
> htt
Thanks Jan, it works. Much simpler than I expected - I had assumed that
melismaBusyProperties had some state that needed to be restored.
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 14:00 +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/1/19 Graham King :
> > Thanks Ted, that works.
> >
> > The one remaining problem is restoring the d
On Wed 19 Jan 2011, 11:08 l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
>
> i'm using \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 to get horizontal beams
> (the only hack i know and that i could find to get horizontal
> beams). but more or less randomly some groups of notes are rendered
> with some slant. i haven been able
2011/1/19 Graham King
> Thanks Jan, it works. Much simpler than I expected - I had assumed that
> melismaBusyProperties had some state that needed to be restored.
Yes, it has - and fortunately that's what \unset does for us! :)
Also, i've just found something that may be useful for you:
\set ign
Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>
> Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
>
> > On 1/18/11 8:26 AM, "Mike Solomon" ufl.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > The following snippet is giving me the attached output w/ the soprano line
> > > shifted way up after the line break. Is there any way to get the soprano
> >
On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> That was quite topical, for an 'off-topic' rant.
> You have to tell us how you prefer to enter the lyrics when
> they are sometimes shared. Is there one Lyrics for alto,
> one for alto-tenor-together, and one for tenor? or do you
> just have alto
Hello scheme-gurus,
nr. 744 is bookmarked ;-)
There's one more thing. I tried the verse-command and it works nicely, but it
will wrap lines:
say you have a stanza like this
--snip--
strI = \lyricmode
{
\set stanza = "1."
Toch -- ter Zi -- on, freu -- e dich,
jauch -- ze laut, Je -- ru -- sa
Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
> Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>
> > Carl Sorensen byu.edu> writes:
> > >
> > > I got it to work successfully with the following change:
> > > [...]
> > > The lyrics were still a little bit high, however.
> >
> > That's an effect of using the same spacing bet
2011/1/18 Carl Sorensen
>
> On 1/18/11 8:26 AM, "Mike Solomon" wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > The following snippet is giving me the attached output w/ the soprano line
> > shifted way up after the line break. Is there any way to get the soprano
> > correctly aligned (w/o changing the distance be
I'll chime in and say that, although there is a workaround, the fact that there
is not good out-of-the-box spacing may effect a lot of real world examples of
choral music that is being engraved using lilypond.
It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker and get this fixed in one
of the
2011/1/18 Marc Hohl :
> Am 18.01.2011 13:48, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> i have a melisma at the end of a sentence and
>> i'd like the dot to appear after the extender (like in the bottom of
>> the attachment).
>> How can this be done? Manuals seem to say nothing about this, as well
>> as the mailing
2011/1/19 Mike Solomon :
> I'll chime in and say that, although there is a workaround, the fact that
> there is not good out-of-the-box spacing may effect a lot of real world
> examples of choral music that is being engraved using lilypond.
>
> It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/1/19 Mike Solomon :
> > It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker and get this fixed in
> > one of the first 2.14 bug fixes (if not 2.14 itself) - thoughts?
>
> In my opinion this issue is important and potentially wide
Mike Solomon ufl.edu> writes:
> I'll chime in and say that, although there is a workaround,
>the fact that there is not good out-of-the-box
> spacing may effect a lot of real world examples of choral music
>that is being engraved using lilypond.
>
> It may be worth it to add this to the issue
"Dmytro O. Redchuk" escribió:
\override Beam #'details #'round-to-zero-slope = #0
\override Beam #'details #'damping-direction-penalty = #0
I've added these two, and it seemed to work.
thank you, dmytro. yes, it seems to work (except for kneed beams, but
i manually avoided them). perh
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>> 2011/1/19 Mike Solomon :
>>> It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker and get this fixed in
>>> one of the first 2.14 bug fixes (if not 2.14 itself) - thoughts?
>>
>
Graham,
2011/1/19 Graham Percival :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>> 2011/1/19 Mike Solomon :
>> > It may be worth it to add this to the issue tracker and get this fixed in
>> > one of the first 2.14 bug fixes (if not 2.14 itself) - thoughts?
>>
>> In my opinion t
James Bailey googlemail.com> writes:
> the smallest snippet I could produce (in 10 minutes) is attached.
>
> Attachment (Funeral Sentences_2.12.ly): application/octet-stream, 2554 bytes
>
So you use a lyrics line for each of the four SATB parts, with \lyricsto taking
timing from the appropriat
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:49:01PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:28:38PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> > Please submit a bug report and let's get it in the tracker.
> > Doubly so if it's a regression.
>
> Exactl
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:58:46PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> Graham,
>
> 2011/1/19 Graham Percival :
> > If necessary, we can pretend that it's deliberate (after noting it
> > in the Changes document), call it a non-regression, make it
> > non-critical, and have a release. That's no reason to n
Lj
-Original Message-
From:
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:44:50 -0200
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
>"Dmytro O. Redchuk" escribió:
>
>
>> \override Beam #'details #'round-to-zero-slope = #0
>> \override Beam #'details #'damping-direction-penalty = #0
>>
>> I
Michael Ellis writes:
> Attached is some scheme code that's probably too long for a snippet,
I don't mind long snippets. Please put it on LSR.
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypon
30 matches
Mail list logo
