Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

> a'\p?var1 c' d' b'\mf?var1 f'\markup{asdf}?var1 d''2\?var2 b'\! I mean, all the var1 dynamics are parallel with each other. All the var2 dynamics are parallel with each other. However, the var1 dynamics are not parallel with the var2 ones (unless by coincidence). -- View this message in contex

Notation for Russian Orthodox Chant

I'm trying to replicate a specific notation used at London Russian Orthodox Cathedral. It's very simple, and consists of two forward-diagonal lines across the middle line of the stave extending to the line above and the line below. It's used to indicate that the note preceding it is to be repeate

negative distance between systems

Hi, I'm sorry if it was asked before, but I didn't have any luck finding it: I need to change the vertical space between the systems so they collide (similarly to this example only it's for the the staves inside the system http://www.kainhofer.com/~lilypond/ajax/Documentation/notation/vertical

Re: Notation for Russian Orthodox Chant

On 19 October 2010 09:58, Richard Downing wrote: > > I'm trying to replicate a specific notation used at London Russian > Orthodox Cathedral.  It's very simple, and consists of two forward-diagonal > lines across the middle line of the stave extending to the line above and > the line below.  It's

Re: orchestral template, please comment

2010/10/19 Keith E OHara > > The defaults are : > Staves within a group are spaced 9 staff-lines apart (from centerline to > centerline). > After the last staff in a group, the next staff is placed 10.5 staff-lines > below (centerline-to-centerline). > After a staff that is not in a group (like pe

Re: orchestral template, please comment

Hello On 19/10/2010 10:01, Jan Warchoł wrote: 2010/10/19 Keith E OHara mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net>> The defaults are : ... However, in my opinion (and i'm an amateur, judging only by my personal taste about readability) there should be more space after ... While all these suggestions

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

2010/10/19 Cordilow > In most music I see out there, I've noticed that related dynamics (and > often > markup) are usually parallel (such that if you drew a horizontal line, it > would meet both at the same vertical position). In fact, I'm hard pressed > to > think of a situation where they're no

Re: orchestral template, please comment

2010/10/19 James > > On 19/10/2010 10:01, Jan Warchoł wrote: > >> However, in my opinion (and i'm an amateur, judging only by my personal >> taste about readability) there should be more space after (...) > > > While all these suggestions are perfectly reasonable, let's not forget > after all this

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Jan Warchoł wrote: > Lily places all dynamics from this group at the same vertical position level >       if the difference is greater, Lily divides this group of related > dynamics in more groups in such a way that the differencies became smaller, > and repeats p

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

If I understand correctly, is this similar to the (rather hackish, imo) lsr snippet? http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=450 On Oct 19, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Cordilow wrote: > > In most music I see out there, I've noticed that related dynamics (and often > markup) are usually parallel (such that if

Re: orchestral template, please comment

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:00:55 -0700, wrote: While all these suggestions are perfectly reasonable, let's not forget after all this is a *template*. Yep. If any clear need comes to light from this discussion of the new spacing, let's make it an enhancement request to adjust the defaults. My

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

> If I understand correctly, is this similar to the (rather hackish, imo) lsr snippet? http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=450 I don't think so. What I mean is with multiple notes so that the dynamics above each note (not the same note) are the same height above the staff. -- View this message

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

> It's a nice idea, however i'd prefer that LilyPond would do this more automatically (the less input user needs to type the better). > Lily forgets about dynamics that are not related to any other dynamics, > i.e. too far apart (like 2 full measures apart or 30 staff spaces apart) … It's a good

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Jan Warchoł wrote: > Lily forgets about dynamics that are not related to any other dynamics, i.e. > too far apart (like 2 full measures apart or 30 staff spaces apart) > for each group of related dynamics: >       for each dynamic in the group Lily calculates the

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

On Oct 19, 2010, at 7:59 PM, Cordilow wrote: > >> If I understand correctly, is this similar to the (rather hackish, imo) lsr > snippet? http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=450 > > I don't think so. What I mean is with multiple notes so that the dynamics > above each note (not the same note) a

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

LilyPond where one could add a tag to certain dynamics to make them parallel: e.g. a'\p?var1 c' d' b'\mf?var1 f'\markup{asdf}?var1 d''2\?var2 b'\! James wrote: If I understand correctly, is this similar to the (rather hackish, imo) lsr snippet? http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=450 I do

Re: orchestral template, please comment

Phil I'm happy to replace this template in the LM now. If you're happy too, could you approve it please? Are you able to run makelsr.py to move it to git? Trevor - Original Message - From: "Keith E OHara" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 6:25 PM Subject: Re: orchestral temp

Re: Parallel dynamics, markup, sponsor, etc.

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Keith E OHara wrote: > Some people like to put all dynamics at exactly the same height: > Speaking of which, this snippet is slightly out-of-date since the Dynamics context is now built-in and ready-to-use. I've updated th

Re: negative distance between systems

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 02:01:22 -0700, zbigb wrote: I tried modifying all of the vertical spacing snippets I could find, but didn't get any closer, The link in your message was to the manual for the development version 2.13, and the vertical spacing system is changing in that version. Instead,

Re: duplicate dynamics on same staff

On 10/13/10 11:49 AM, James Bailey wrote: On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: Any chance the full-measure/multi-measure problem will get fixed? How can we merge a multi-measure rest with a part-measure rest? Unless things have changed, even trying to merge multi-measure rests

Re: duplicate dynamics on same staff

On 10/11/10 6:22 PM, James Bailey wrote: On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote: On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote: if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus you: 1) save typ

Lyrics inside the staff

Hello, I couldn't find anything useful re: placing the lyrics inside the staff - i.e. shifting vertically is it possible? thanks, zb -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Lyrics-inside-the-staff-tp30004819p30004819.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list arch

Re: duplicate dynamics on same staff

On 10/11/10 5:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote: On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote: if the dynamics are the same, it's better to write them just once. thus you: 1) save typing 2) help lilypond so it does't need to waste time

Re: Lyrics inside the staff

Hi "zb", > I couldn't find anything useful re: placing the lyrics inside the staff Does the snippet not do what you want? If not, please be more specific in your question, and include an image of the desired output if possible. Cheers, Kieren. _

Re: Lyrics inside the staff

Hi "zb", > I couldn't find anything useful re: placing the lyrics inside the staff Does the snippet not do what you want? If not, please be more specific in your question, and include an image of the desired output if possible. Cheers, Kieren. _

Re: duplicate dynamics on same staff

On 10/19/10 4:19 PM, "James Wilkinson" wrote: > On 10/13/10 11:49 AM, James Bailey wrote: >> >> On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: Any chance the full-measure/multi-measure problem will get fixed? >>> >>> How can we merge a multi-measure rest with a part-measure res

Re: duplicate dynamics on same staff

On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:21 AM, James Wilkinson wrote: > On 10/11/10 6:22 PM, James Bailey wrote: >> >> On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:32:48PM -0400, James Wilkinson wrote: On 9/23/10 6:00 PM, Vicente Solsona wrote: > if the d