\version "2.13.31"
\relative c'' {
a'16[ e c a e a]
}
Nick
<>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 31 Aug 2010, at 05:32, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:25:04PM -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
Is there a reason that the reply-to header is not set for the
mailing list?
Just hit "reply to all".
Which ends up sending a useless extra copy to the OP, like you will
have gotten
Hi!
(sorry, crossposted)
This may be related to issues 379 and 427[1] .)
First of all --- please, excuse me if i missed something.
My colleague, who helps me in typing pitches, made a mistake --- well,
everyone of us may do this, it's just extra unneeded opening bracket, extra
SlurEvent in a mu
On 30 August 2010 23:21, Tim McNamara wrote:
>
> Notice the difference between:
>
> after-title-space=0\cm
>
> and
>
> after-title-space = #0
>
> Which will probably result in different results.
You are right.
I'm now used to the 2.13 system and its lists of parameters/values.
after-title-spac
On 31 August 2010 09:39, Nick Payne wrote:
>
> \version "2.13.31"
>
> \relative c'' {
> a'16[ e c a e a]
> }
You should use
\override StringNumber #'add-stem-support = ##t
It is documented in snippet "Avoiding collisions with chord fingerings"
NR 1.7.1 Inside the staff > Fingering instruct
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> On 31 August 2010 09:39, Nick Payne wrote:
>>
>> \version "2.13.31"
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>> a'16[ e c a e a]
>> }
>
> You should use
> \override StringNumber #'add-stem-support = ##t
>
> It is documented in snippet "Avoiding collisions with chord fingerings"
>
Hi Patrick,
I'm not familiar with the inner workings of lilypond, but it
seems to me the problem occurs when a TabStaff command
(\set TabStaff.minimumFret) is executed in a Staff context.
using \set minimumFret = #5 instead should solve the problem.
Regards,
Phil.
Hi all,
I found two insta
Tim McNamara writes:
> On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:25:04PM -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
>>> Is there a reason that the reply-to header is not set for the
>>> mailing list?
>>
>> Just hit "reply to all".
>
> Which ends up sending a useless extr
Hi Phil,
Am 31.08.2010 um 11:48 schrieb Phil Burfitt:
Hi Patrick,
I'm not familiar with the inner workings of lilypond, but it
seems to me the problem occurs when a TabStaff command
(\set TabStaff.minimumFret) is executed in a Staff context.
using \set minimumFret = #5 instead should solve the
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:32:52 -0500
Tim McNamara wrote:
> > Just hit "reply to all".
>
> Which ends up sending a useless extra copy to the OP, like you will
I also think that replies should be set to the list but there are
options to solve this problem. After all, even if replies go to the
list
Hi guys!
I want to write a small snippet for demonstration purposes, which
contains lyrics. The problem is, that the first measure of the cited
fragment is the second syllable of a word (Pro - phe - ten, the "Pro" is
missing). In order to increase the readability of this snippet, I wanted
to use a
I am trying to set up a ``normal'' repeat that repeats only twice in one of
my Orthodox chant settings. Attached is the file. All I am getting, however,
is a set of double bar lines. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
--
In Christ,
Michael D
\version "2.12.2"
\include "english.ly"
\include "g
On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:35 PM, Michael Dykes wrote:
> I am trying to set up a ``normal'' repeat that repeats only twice in one of
> my Orthodox chant settings. Attached is the file. All I am getting, however,
> is a set of double bar lines. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
http://lilypond
On 2010-08-31 22:35, Michael Dykes wrote:
I am trying to set up a ``normal'' repeat that repeats only twice in one
of my Orthodox chant settings. Attached is the file. All I am getting,
however, is a set of double bar lines. Any help would be appreciated.
Hi, Michael,
you have to use
\
On 31 August 2010 22:35, Michael Dykes wrote:
>
> I am trying to set up a ``normal'' repeat that repeats only twice in
> one of my Orthodox chant settings. Attached is the file. All I am
> getting, however, is a set of double bar lines. Any help would be
> appreciated. Thanks.
Hi!
That's due
I was wondering why I never got a response to this. Turns out that I
sent it to gun.org. Duh. Let's try again.
version is 2.13.29-1
This is a flute part, so there's just one staff per system. It's two
pages long. Page one has 8 staves spaced to fill the page. Page two
has 7 staves that are
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:40:27 -0700, David Rogers
wrote:
> * Michael Welsh Duggan [2010-08-30 18:04]:
>>Yes, there is a reason.
>>
>>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>>http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.txt
>
>
> The logic at those links is impeccable but irrelevant. The
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:49 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
> I was wondering why I never got a response to this. Turns out that I sent
> it to gun.org. Duh. Let's try again.
>
>
> version is 2.13.29-1
>
>
> This is a flute part, so there's just one staff per system. It's two pages
> long. Page one
David Rogers schrieb:
> * Jan Kohnert [2010-08-31 06:22]:
> >David Rogers schrieb:
> >> * Michael Welsh Duggan [2010-08-30 18:04]:
> >> >Tim McNamara writes:
> >> >> Is there a reason that the reply-to header is not set for the mailing
> >> >> list?
> >> >
> >> >Yes, there is a reason.
> >> >
>
When I look at commercially engraved guitar scores that I have, short
text spanners, such as string number indications, follow the slope of a
beam. If there are several of them along a sloping beam, they descend or
ascend along with the beam so that there is a constant spacing between
each span
* Kaz Kylheku [2010-08-31 16:56]:
If you see a message from Bob in your inbox, and reply
using Bob's mail address, that is a properly directed reply,
which may come in two flavors: with or without a cc: to the
discussion.
I know how it's supposed to work. How it's supposed to work is wrong an
I may be in over my head. What I am trying to do is produce a hymnal.
After much experimentation, I have settled upon a layout I like that I
am using on a per-hymn basis. I have abstracted these portions of my
input files and created header.ly and footer.ly. For each individual
hymn, I then use \in
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:19:56 +0200, Jan Kohnert
wrote:
> David Rogers schrieb:
>> * Jan Kohnert [2010-08-31 06:22]:
>> >David Rogers schrieb:
>> >> * Michael Welsh Duggan [2010-08-30 18:04]:
>> >> >Tim McNamara writes:
>> >> >> Is there a reason that the reply-to header is not set for the maili
[Fullquote intended.]
Am Mittwoch 01 September 2010, 06:20:06 schrieben Sie:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:19:56 +0200, Jan Kohnert
>
> wrote:
> > David Rogers schrieb:
> >> * Jan Kohnert [2010-08-31 06:22]:
> >> >David Rogers schrieb:
> >> >> * Michael Welsh Duggan [2010-08-30 18:04]:
> >> >> >Tim
Why doesn't the initial bar display in the second case?
-Steve
\version "2.13.31"
% snippet from "Printing A Repeat Sign at the Beginning of a
Piece"
\include "firstRepeatOverride.ly"
\score {
\new Staff {
25 matches
Mail list logo
