2009/4/26 Antheo :
> _\markup { \italic { rit. } }
% definition:
rit = \markup { \bold \italic "rit." }
% usage:
_\rit -\rit ^\rit
% or even, i guess, this should work:
_\markup { \italic "poco" \rit }
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
___
lilypond-user ma
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/4/25 Marc Hohl :
Hello tablature users*,
Like Carl, I'm not a tablature user, so I can only comment on matters of coding.
Some suggestions and thoughts follow below:
% some publications use the triangled note head
% for palm mute, so here we go:
palmMut
2009/4/27 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
> % or even, i guess, this should work:
> _\markup { \italic "poco" \rit }
Yes, it does, but how would you do it for \upbow and \downbow?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
lilypond-user mailing list
2009/4/27 Francisco Vila :
> 2009/4/27 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
>> % or even, i guess, this should work:
>> _\markup { \italic "poco" \rit }
>
> Yes, it does, but how would you do it for \upbow and \downbow?
:-)
Don't know.
Since these are not a question of formatting (which may lead to
different let
2009/4/27 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
> 2009/4/27 Francisco Vila :
>> 2009/4/27 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
>>> % or even, i guess, this should work:
>>> _\markup { \italic "poco" \rit }
>>
>> Yes, it does, but how would you do it for \upbow and \downbow?
> :-)
>
> Don't know.
I have investigated a bit how downb
2009/4/27 Francisco Vila :
> I have investigated a bit how downbow is defined and I've found it in
> the source code in ly/script-init.ly so we can write
>
> db = #(make-articulation "downbow")
> ub = #(make-articulation "upbow")
>
> { c' \db c' \ub }
Thank you.
This can be very useful for me,
in
Hi all,
How can a make a custom context with a "built-in" scaleDuration
factor? e.g. I have
\context
{
\Voice
\name CustomVoice
\alias Voice
\override NoteHead #'duration-log = #8
}
Now, rather than writing
myMusic = \scaleDurations #'(1 . 8) \relative { ...
I'd lik
2009/4/26 Robin Bannister :
> Mark Austin wrote:
>>
>> I'm putting the finishing touches on a book of English folk tunes, but
>> have a few problems.
>
> I suppose it's rather crude, but I like using \null for things like this.
>
> So, for the footer: \markup { Engraved ... } becomes
> \ma
On 4/27/09 3:38 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Neil Puttock schrieb:
>> 2009/4/25 Marc Hohl :
>>
>>> (font-size (- (* num-strings 1.5) 7))
>>> (base-skip (cond ((= 4 num-strings) 1.55)
>>>((= 5 num-strings) 1.84)
>>>((= 6
Carl D. Sorensen schrieb:
On 4/27/09 3:38 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/4/25 Marc Hohl :
(font-size (- (* num-strings 1.5) 7))
(base-skip (cond ((= 4 num-strings) 1.55)
((= 5 num-strings) 1.84)
Hi everyone,
I have got the suspicion, that I detected a bug in 2.12 - but I am not
sure:confused::
As I wrote into the group on April 19th, I try to engrave a grace note at
the beginning of a pickup-bar;
The whole story is, that I engrave a string quartet useing the
string-quartet snippet for
Pekka Siponen schrieb:
For chords I don't think there is a standard approach. Chords haven't
been around long enough. I was hoping to collect opinions here. :)
Maybe the best source would be in some typography book? I checked mine
and couldn't find any specific mention about the position, only
Hello,
For writing leadsheets that consist of chords and rhythm, I'd like to
have single-line systems, which I achieve using this code:
\new DrumStaff \with{
drumStyleTable = #percussion-style
\override StaffSymbol #'line-count = #1
}
{
\override Staff.BarLine #'bar-si
Chip wrote:
It normally means your snippet is incompatible with the version of
LilyPond being run on LSR (2.10.12) or needs either `Standalone
snippet' or `Large snippet' ticked. If you still can't get it
working, please post it here and I'll give it the once over.
Regards,
Neil
Thanks Neil,
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Chip wrote:
It normally means your snippet is incompatible with the version of
LilyPond being run on LSR (2.10.12) or needs either `Standalone
snippet' or `Large snippet' ticked. If you still can't get it
working, please post it here and I'll give it the once over.
Regard
Chip wrote:
Jon
Thanks for the info.
Just out of curiosity - why isn't the LSR kept up-to-date with the
latest release? The lastest stable release is 2.12.2 according to the
lily homepage, yet the LSR Contributing page says it is running 2.10.12
and at the same time says it always runs the l
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Chip wrote:
Jon
Thanks for the info.
Just out of curiosity - why isn't the LSR kept up-to-date with the
latest release? The lastest stable release is 2.12.2 according to the
lily homepage, yet the LSR Contributing page says it is running
2.10.12 and at the same time say
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Pekka Siponen schrieb:
>>
>> For chords I don't think there is a standard approach. Chords haven't been
>> around long enough. I was hoping to collect opinions here. :) Maybe the best
>> source would be in some typography book? I checked mine and
On 4/27/09 12:47 PM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen schrieb:
>>
>> On 4/27/09 3:38 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
>>
>>
> No, I didn't get this mail. I played around with your suggestions and the
> improvements given by Neil and have now:
>
> #(define-markup-command (customTabClef layout
19 matches
Mail list logo
