> dammit, i should think a bit more before answering things. TextSpanner has
> been moved to the score context, so we need to tell the override to use the
> TextSpanner objects in the Score context rather than the default.
Wonderful, you did it! Thank you very much. The more I use lily, the
more I
On 21 Apr 2009, at 09:11, Frédéric Bron wrote:
dammit, i should think a bit more before answering things.
TextSpanner has
been moved to the score context, so we need to tell the override to
use the
TextSpanner objects in the Score context rather than the default.
Wonderful, you did it! Tha
frédéric,
On 21 Apr 2009, at 09:50, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Halas, for StaffGroup, the trick works but the spanners are all at the
top of the score, not above each StaffGroup.
now i'm at wit's end. my first suggestion would be to just put the
Text_spanner_engraver in the top staff of each Sta
Halas, for StaffGroup, the trick works but the spanners are all at the
top of the score, not above each StaffGroup.
Frédéric
\version "2.12.0"
stringendo = { \textSpannerUp \override StaffGroup.TextSpanner
#'(bound-details left text) = "Stringendo" }
\new Score <<
\new StaffGroup \with {
Jonathan Townes wrote:
the use of fingerings would be much faster and require less typing
This nice aspect of fingerings is due to the parser knowing what a
fingering looks like. But this is defined as being a single digit,
so you only have ten things you can ask for (corresponding to 0 .. 9)
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi Dave,
Hi Jan ! Sorry for this delayed reply, I've been a bit overwhelmed here.
Too much work, too much family stuff going on, too much of everything
except spare time.
If your objection to LWN is re: someone else's comment on my articles
Yeah, that'
Op maandag 13-04-2009 om 18:17 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Valentin
Villenave:
> Well, it's time for a reboot! The LilyPond Report is back, with a new
> design, new features... but still the same spirit :-)
Yay, hooray! Thanks!
Oh, and good for you for taking the, uhm, break, it was well wort
Hi Frédéric:
Halas, for StaffGroup, the trick works but the spanners are
all at the top of the score, not above each StaffGroup.
Maybe this hint will help you solve the problem:
\version "2.12.2"
\layout
{
\context
{
\type "Engraver_group"
\con
now that's a far more elegant solution than anything i'd ever have
come up with. :) thanks, kieren, i just learnt some new things. :)
regards,
sb
On 21 Apr 2009, at 14:27, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Frédéric:
Halas, for StaffGroup, the trick works but the spanners are
all at the top of the
Fingering indications on grace notes doesn't shrink to be proportional to
the reduced size of the grace note, and the full size indication looks
excessively large alongside the note. It's easy enough to override - using
\override Fingering #'font-size = #-8 seems about right - but perhaps this
shou
I'm a new user of Lily Pond. I'm running the program under Windows XP (I know,
I know, don't tell me...) I find it fast and easy to use. I prefer it to
Finale because it's so easy to debug the code.
JEdit is O.K., but it would be a big help to me if there were a dual-window
editor that
(see previous post). I found the Manual and the Notation Reference very
helpful. I just have a couple of suggestions.
The Command Summary which is part of Notation Reference (Appendix C, Cheat
Sheet, page 545 ff.) could be extracted and made part of the short Guides.
Once I learned it w
Op maandag 20 april 2009, schreef rathcof...@comcast.net:
> JEdit is O.K., but it would be a big help to me if there were a dual-window
> editor that would incorporate an interpreter (rather than a compiler). One
> window would show the text file as it was being developed; the other side
> would d
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:34:56PM +, rathcof...@comcast.net wrote:
> The Command Summary which is part of Notation Reference
> (Appendix C, Cheat Sheet, page 545 ff.) could be extracted and
> made part of the short Guides. Once I learned it was there, I
> found it in Notation Reference, print
On 4/20/09 6:26 AM, "rathcof...@comcast.net" wrote:
> I'm a new user of Lily Pond. I'm running the program under Windows XP (I
> know, I know, don't tell me...) I find it fast and easy to use. I prefer it
> to Finale because it's so easy to debug the code.
>
There's nothing wrong with run
mw,
On 20 Apr 2009, at 14:34, rathcof...@comcast.net wrote:
You could make these conventions explicit - I had to learn about
them by trial and error.
cis'4 is a valid command; cis4' is not.
there is a perverse logic to this, which makes it not a convention but
syntax. the ' and , are actu
hi,
On 20 Apr 2009, at 14:26, rathcof...@comcast.net wrote:
I'm a new user of Lily Pond. I'm running the program under Windows
XP (I know, I know, don't tell me...) I find it fast and easy to
use. I prefer it to Finale because it's so easy to debug the code.
lily works well on windows,
sorry if this is double posted, my mail-client seems to be affected by
sunspot activity or the lack of it. :)
mw,
On 20 Apr 2009, at 14:34, rathcof...@comcast.net wrote:
You could make these conventions explicit - I had to learn about
them by trial and error.
cis'4 is a valid command; cis4
on a mac, i use TeXShop. you can probably get TeXniccenter on windows
to play nicely with lilypond -- iirc it's easy to add a new
typesetting engine to it, but i haven't done things like that on
windows for a few years. (i think they called them output profiles).
or you can go the route of JE
Exellent, it is exactly what I was hoping! I am going back to the
documentation to see if I can learn such magic things.
Thanks!
Frédéric
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
frédéric,
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Exellent, it is exactly what I was hoping! I am going back to the
documentation to see if I can learn such magic things.
start in LM 3.3 and then move on to NR 5.1.
regards,
sb
--
Simon Bailey
Oompa Loompa of Science
+43 699 190 631
Hello,
I installed jEdit and LilyPondTool (LPT) at Windows XP.
Unfortunately LPT could not be installed with the Plugin Manager of jEdit
4.2. So I choosed to install jEdit 4.3pre16 (the development version) and
LPT.
I also write in LaTeX and tried to use jEdit for this purpose. But jEdit
han
Helge Kruse schreef:
> Hello,
>
> I installed jEdit and LilyPondTool (LPT) at Windows XP.
> Unfortunately LPT could not be installed with the Plugin Manager of
> jEdit 4.2. So I choosed to install jEdit 4.3pre16 (the development
> version) and LPT.
>
LPT works nice in jEdit 4.3pre16 on Windows XP
Hi all,
Do we have anything to convert a lilypond file to a music xml file.
Doing a google search just provides the opposite, xml to lily. Anybody
know of anything?
Craig Bakalian
560 Keswick Drive
Yardley, PA 19067
215-428-0856
___
lilypond
I tried your recommendations with the \grace before the \partial; it doesn't
seem to work;
as requested, here's the full example; it is based on two files: the second
one is the music-file and the first one is the file for the full score,
including the music-file
%% FILE 1:
\include "sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dienstag, 21. April 2009 20:24:42 craigbakalian wrote:
> Do we have anything to convert a lilypond file to a music xml file.
No,
Reinhold
- --
- --
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@
2009/4/21 craigbakalian :
> Do we have anything to convert a lilypond file to a music xml file.
> Doing a google search just provides the opposite, xml to lily. Anybody
> know of anything?
This is a popular feature request, and hopefully someone will
implement it some day:
http://code.goog
Hi all,
Frédéric wrote:
Exellent, it is exactly what I was hoping!
Glad to hear that!
I am going back to the documentation to see if I can learn such
magic things.
Bonne chance!
_
Simon wrote:
now that's a far more elegant solution than anything i'd ever have
come up with.
As others have replied, this isn't currently a lilypond feature. However, a
commercial
program called pdftomusicpro provides translation between pdf output and another
format which can then be exported to musicxml. It works pretty well, although
I've only used it for leadsheet and songbook-style
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>
> Actually as LPT has its own parser, which can tell more or less whether
> the current input is valid, a constantly updated view could be possible.
> (Like looking for the last valid version of the file in every 30 seconds
> and generate the file.)
>
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>
>
> Since I'm currently teaching (a week-long FileMaker Pro course), I
> must be in good instructor mode... ;-)
>
>
nice solution so far - but still some open points!
trying to take advantage of your mood i'll ask the following questions:
- it might be simpler to
hiya,
On 22 Apr 2009, at 00:35, -Eluze wrote:
nice solution so far - but still some open points!
trying to take advantage of your mood i'll ask the following
questions:
- it might be simpler to use skips (s) in the contextSpan voice
kieren was probably copy-pasting and saving time. if you
Hi,
I am to do many hymns with 2 to 6 verses. Then the music continues with
some and a single chorus follows. I do the hymns with the verses, fine. I
can add the chorus when the chorus has the same music as the verses below
the bottom staff. (There are two staffs, like piano music, treble and
Steve Yegge gmail.com> writes:
> Any idea how to squelch these? -steve
I don't know how to disable these warnings, but there are a couple other options
which would yield the same result without warnings:
- Separate the pedals from the music. This would be similar to how the
"Piano template with c
> - it might be simpler to use skips (s) in the contextSpan voice
This would be more complicated as I just have to write \clarinet for
example whereas with spaces, I would have to calculate exactly where
each spanners goes (I am writing the 4th symphony of Schumann and the
conductor score is 100 pa
Am 22.04.2009 um 04:55 schrieb johanperu:
Hi,
I am to do many hymns with 2 to 6 verses. Then the music continues
with
some and a single chorus follows. I do the hymns with the verses,
fine. I
can add the chorus when the chorus has the same music as the verses
below
the bottom staff.
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
Feel free to contribute this feature ;-)
Doh! :(
That didn't mean I wouldn't do it :)
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
What I normally do is just typeset the music as one piece, and then
one verse is extra long.
So:
sopMusic { cccetc}
verseOne { A song A chorus}
verseTwo { A song}
This shows correctly and the most I have to do is \break the music at
the right place. You can even use a \markup to add R
I also write in LaTeX and tried to use jEdit for this purpose. But jEdit
hangs several times per hour when running LaTeX. I argue that it would
be better to use the stable version 4.2 of jEdit. But there's no LPT
available
I haven't used LaTeX for some years, that was before I used jEdit.
Yo
39 matches
Mail list logo
