Hi Dmytro,
replace uplyr by the following:
uplyr = \lyricmode {
la -- la -- la -- la __ "" _ _
la -- la -- la
}
You should know, that _ does the same as \skip 1, but is easier to write.
Hope this helps!
Dominic
2008/9/29 Dmytro O. Redchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, all.
>
> In vocal scor
Hi all,
i guess: since dynamics are "parts" of Voice context,
and Lyrics is a separate context (of "the same level") --
it is impossible to place dynamics far from staff than lyrics
(to place lyrics between staff and dynamics).
Is that true?
Thank you.
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
__
Another solution, (and the one that I use), is to put the notes for which the
words are different into a different voice context, and then add lyrics to that
voice. It requires a bit more planning before you begin to typeset, but it
makes files a little easier to navigate, in my opinion, and I c
2008/9/29 Dmytro O. Redchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i guess: since dynamics are "parts" of Voice context,
> and Lyrics is a separate context (of "the same level") --
> it is impossible to place dynamics far from staff than lyrics
> (to place lyrics between staff and dynamics).
I've been wondering t
Quoting Risto Vääräniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/9/29 Dmytro O. Redchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i guess: since dynamics are "parts" of Voice context,
and Lyrics is a separate context (of "the same level") --
it is impossible to place dynamics far from staff than lyrics
(to place lyrics between s
Hi,
I'm trying to input a large score (more than 20 pages) in a Latex
document. I have a code like:
...
\chapter{Score}
\begin{lilypond}
\input{score.ly}
\end{lilypond}
...
The first page is cut because the chapter name position pushes the
score down. I think I can solve the problem changing firs
2008/9/29 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why not use the "Dynamics" context, defined in the template for
> Piano with centered dynamics?
Great. Thanks! :-)
> /Mats
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http
Hi, all,
i'm sorry, this is, probably, purely-scheme-related-question.
Sorry, i'm not a programmer.
I wanted to align tempo mark ("Adagio", "Moderato" etc)
left-side-centered on key signature
if it is not C-dur or A-moll, otherwise aligned left-side above left
side of time signature.
I wrote sma
> "Marcos" == Marcos di Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcos> I'm trying to input a large score (more than 20 pages) in a Latex
Marcos> document. I have a code like:
Marcos> ...
Marcos> \chapter{Score}
Marcos> \begin{lilypond}
Marcos> \input{score.ly}
Marcos> \e
Have you, by chance, included a \book{...} block in your score.ly file?
If that's the case, then I can understand
that you get this problem. If you don't have any explicit
\book{...} block, then you can get a page break between
any score line (system), so you shouldn't get the problem
you describ
Id like to make a smaller RhythmicStaff with some special qualities,
like smaller font etc. This one works fine, but i have a couple of
things id like to fix[1] (see below):
rytmestaff = #(define-music-function (parser location navn rytmer) (string?
ly:music?)
#{
\c
Note that this template is old and that "Dynamic_engraver" should be replaced
with "New_dynamic_engraver" and "Dynamic_line_engraver"
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-07/msg00242.html
On Monday, September 29, 2008, at 12:11PM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrot
Hi,
the \stemUp command does not work for \longa in my score.
Any solutions?
Thank you,
Alan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Anders,
I'm not sure about the colouring issue. Hoping someone else has some
ideas.
The "doubled" Noteheads come about because RhythmicStaff interprets
all pitches as the same. I don't know what effect you are wanting
exactly, but if you want a single staff line with Noteheads on eithe
Hi,
I haven't had the time to read all the discussions related to the new
web layout of the 2.11 documentation, but wonder if I'm the only one
who miss the possibility to view the full table of contents with all
subsections expanded. I'm very used to search for some word in the
table of content
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Mats Bengtsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't had the time to read all the discussions related to the new
> web layout of the 2.11 documentation, but wonder if I'm the only one who
> miss the possibility to view the full table of contents with all
>
2008/9/29 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I haven't had the time to read all the discussions related to the new
> web layout of the 2.11 documentation, but wonder if I'm the only one who
> miss the possibility to view the full table of contents with all
> subsections expanded.
Hi Mats,
I d
> "V" == Vivian Barty-Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
V> The "doubled" Noteheads come about because RhythmicStaff
V> interprets all pitches as the same. I don't know what effect you
V> are wanting exactly
Thanks.
Im after what ive understood RhythmicStaff was meant for, a
Yes, I missed the full ToC too. Although if you had
looked up "distances" in the index it would have
directed you to "5.4.3 Distances and measurements".
But this is a fortuitous example. In spite of the
excellent work by Ralph to add @cindexes everywhere
the section headings are not in general
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 29. September 2008 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
> I haven't had the time to read all the discussions related to the new
> web layout of the 2.11 documentation, but wonder if I'm the only one
> who miss the possibility to view the full table of co
Quoting Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ahm, sorry if I sound destructive, but: How hard is it to click
on "[Contents]", which is located in EVERY gray navigation bar on EVERY page?
Sorry! It's the eyes that get blind first, right?
/Mats
___
Reinhold, you wrote Monday, September 29, 2008 11:03 PM
Am Montag, 29. September 2008 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
I haven't had the time to read all the discussions related to the new
web layout of the 2.11 documentation, but wonder if I'm the only one
who miss the possibility to view the full tab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 29. September 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
> 2008/9/29 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I haven't had the time to read all the discussions related to the new
> > web layout of the 2.11 documentation, but wonder if I'm the only one
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 29. September 2008 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
>> I haven't had the time to read all the discussions related to the new
>> web layout of the 2.11 documentation
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Ahm, sorry if I sound destructive, but: How hard is it to click
on "[Contents]", which is located in EVERY gray navigation bar on EVERY page
Does anyone else feel like we're doomed to follow Reinhold having good
ideas only weeks after he's already had them;)
Patrick
I don't understand these references to "the Complete Table of Contents".
As I see it, there are at least 5 separate "Tables of Contents", with no
easy way to move from one to another:
Learning Manual
Notation Reference
Internals Reference
Application Usage
Snippets List
And once I'm in one of the
26 matches
Mail list logo
