If you want to make a LaTeX document that contains some scores, I strongly
recommend you to use lilypond-book.
/Mats
Adam Good wrote:
A question from a forever it seems newbie...
When I compile a piece in Lilypond that turns out to be say, a 3 page
pdf, I get one pdf file that has 3 pages.
On 2 May 2007, at 22:24, Adam Good wrote:
A question from a forever it seems newbie...
When I compile a piece in Lilypond that turns out to be say, a 3
page pdf, I get one pdf file that has 3 pages. is it possible to
have it instead compile 3 separate .pdf files?
There are tools such as <
Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes:
>
> If you want to make a LaTeX document that contains some scores, I strongly
> recommend you to use lilypond-book.
Is lilypond-book actively developed?
I'm especially thinking of stuff like actually using page-based vertical and
horizontal layout with a lily
On May 3, 2007, at 6:53 AM, Arvid Grøtting wrote:
Users of unstable LilyPond please raise a hand:
hand!
Stan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>> Users of unstable LilyPond please raise a hand:
plutek raises *both* hands, hoping the vote-counters won't notice.
personal projects only (no commercial work for other folks), but all of my own
composing for my various ensembles is either hand-copied (yes, pen and ink!) or
typeset in lily-u
Arvid Grøtting wrote:
Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes:
If you want to make a LaTeX document that contains some scores, I strongly
recommend you to use lilypond-book.
Is lilypond-book actively developed?
I'm especially thinking of stuff like actually using page-based vertical and
Mats,
I've been using Lilypond-LaTeX lately to start getting my book of 1-3
page pieces together. It's working for the most part pretty well
although it can be painfully slow the more pieces i \include and I'm
only up to about 19 pieces in my book so far. I can't even imagine
what's going to
Adam,
I haven't followed the thread in depth so sorry for eventual
misconceptions.
So out of curiosity one day I checked out including one of my
pieces as a pdf in a LaTeX document (which i couldn't get happening
in Lilypond-LaTeX but could get happening in LaTeX) and it loaded
way way
> "Adam" == Adam Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> I've been using Lilypond-LaTeX lately to start getting my
Adam> book of 1-3 page pieces together. It's working for the most
Adam> part pretty well although it can be painfully slow the more
Adam> pieces i \include and I'm
2007/5/3, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You are right that the handling of inter-score line distance, for
example, is lost since
each score line is generated as a separate EPS/PDF file which is then
included into
the LaTeX document using \includegraphics{...}.
However, this is not necessar
My suggestion would be to use pdflatex with the pdfpages package. This
will enable you to include full pdf documents in your latex source
files. Anyway, the only difference between latex and pdflatex (at
least for the end-user) is that one creates pdf the other dvi.
We use it regularly to create
On Friday 04 May 2007 03:35, Laura Conrad wrote:
> > "Adam" == Adam Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adam> I've been using Lilypond-LaTeX lately to start getting my
> Adam> book of 1-3 page pieces together. It's working for the most
> Adam> part pretty well although it can be pa
2007/5/3, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm having trouble following this discussion of lilypond-book being
> slow -- I've just been putting together a 110 page book of Dowland
> parts (so about 80 individual 1-2 page "pieces" from lilypond's point
> of view), and I was pleasantly surprised a
13 matches
Mail list logo